Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CA: Counties Return to Central Count to Save $.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-20-10 09:34 PM
Original message
CA: Counties Return to Central Count to Save $.

Elections looking a little old-fashioned

By Sam Womack/Staff Writer swomack@lompocrecord.com

Posted: Friday, June 18, 2010

snip

To save the cash-strapped county some money, elections officials decided to go back to the future with ballot-counting methods, according to Joe Holland, Santa Barbara County clerk-recorder-assessor.

snip

Rodewald agreed, saying, It not only saves us money with all the pre- and post-election testing, but it gives us better control over the process.

The counties save money by not programming more than 100 voting machines, testing them, sealing them, maintaining an audit log, hiring staff to distribute the machines, and then paying an extra poll worker to be responsible for each machine on election day, Holland said.

snip

A few years ago, poll workers could transfer the results electronically by modem from their precincts voting machines to the election office at the end of election day.

While it was quick and painless, the Secretary of State released revised guidelines that prohibited collecting ballot results by modem, Holland said.

In 2008, both counties kept the voting machines at precincts, then had the memory cards driven to an elections center.

snip

http://www.lompocrecord.com/news/local/govt-and-politic...

Refresh | +4 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
tabatha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-20-10 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. And there was no difference in time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-20-10 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. central counting of precinct cast ballots
opens the election up to fraud.

In NC, if a ballot is cast at polling place, it is supposed to be counted there.
Before getting hauled off to election office.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Stevepol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-20-10 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Counting at the polling place is better than in the article,
But it is better that they're carting their ballots to the central place and not the modem. It at least removes one layer of possible fraud, though of course the ballots are put thru optiscans at the central site and there's probably no audit to ck so it's essentially also an un-verified, totally secret election. Not a lot of difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 28th 2014, 03:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC