Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

2/17. Groups warn ES&S merger is security threat, Future of CA Voting, VA sued over voter files

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-17-10 08:55 PM
Original message
2/17. Groups warn ES&S merger is security threat, Future of CA Voting, VA sued over voter files
Sorry its late. for some reason I thought I posted this already tonight. Oh well.

Groups warn ES&S merger is security threat, Future of CA Voting comments posted, VA officials sued over voter files

Feb 17, 2010

The news is fairly light today so be sure to read the public comments on the Future of Voting in California now posted at the CA SOS website. The comments come from experts, advocates, interested citizens and also voting vendors including internet voting vendors...
ES&S Diebold Purchase: Groups Endorse Remedies for Unlawful Concentration of Market Power... In NM, the house has voted to contributions from lobbyist, the bill now heads to the senate.... Voting to become easier for Alabama service members....

All this and more in today's news below....

AL: New bill would expand absentee voting options (next to state senate)
http://www.montgomeryadvertiser.com/article/20100217/NE...
The bill would allow service members to file requests for absentee ballots by e-mail or fax. Currently, the requests must be made by U.S. Postal Service. It also would allow for the ballots to be sent to the service members by e-mail or fax, as well as U.S. Postal Service.

CA: ACLU of Northern California Opposes Top-Two Open Primary
http://www.ballot-access.org/2010/02/17/aclu-of-norther... /
CA: Breaking News: Federal District Court Issues Important Split Decision in San Diego Campaign Finance Case
http://electionlawblog.org/archives/015297.html

CA: Battle lines form over electronic signatures to qualify ballot initiatives
http://www.mercurynews.com/breaking-news/ci_14415504?nc...
...But hours after Chief Elections Officer Warren Slocum announced Tuesday that he would reject any electronic signature scribbled on an iPhone's touch screen, the founders of a Silicon Valley start-up company said they would file a lawsuit this week challenging the rejection.
...
"I think that until it's clear that this kind of technology can't be tampered with, hard copy signatures should be the way to go," Smith added. "I don't think we're clear on that point." (Pam Smith, President of Verified Voting)

CT: ES&S Diebold Purchase: Groups Endorse Remedies for Unlawful Concentration of Market Power
http://www.ctvoterscount.org/?p=2888

NC: City feeling pressure to change its election system
http://bit.ly/a0pNeA
Settlemyer and City Manager Sally Sandy drove home the point when they said Morganton's alone-in-the-state status running its own municipal election could cost $25,000 to $30,000 or more for new hardware
...
Today, no N.C. city has its own board of elections except Morganton. An increasing number of people are asking why.

NM: House votes to ban contributions from lobbyists, contractors
Bill bans contributions to candidates and political parties
http://newmexicoindependent.com/47804/house-votes-to-ba...

VA: Virginia Election Officials Sued for Unlawfully Denying Access to Voter Files
http://bit.ly/9Md1Pb

VA: Election Law Society Symposium! March 18, 2010
http://electls.blogs.wm.edu/2010/02/17/election-law-soc... /
(William & Mary) The Election Law Society is proud to announce its fourth annual Election Law Symposium, Back to the Drawing Board: The 2010 Census and the Politics of Redistricting.

National

Groups and Election Officials Warn Department of Justice that Voting Machine Vendor Merger will Inflate Costs to Taxpayers, Threaten Election Accuracy and National Security
http://blog.verifiedvoting.org/2010/02/17/401
The letter strongly warns of profound risks to national security when one vendor controls the programming and maintenance of the election equipment in a 70% majority of election jurisdictions or entire states. Centralization of voting system programming and maintenance increases the possibility of widespread election failure, the experts warn, which could have the potential to de-stabilize the Nation and could present a threat to U.S. national security.

"Poll: Large majority opposes Supreme Court's decision on campaign financing"
http://electionlawblog.org/archives/015295.html


Voting News Archives here at http://votingnews.blogspot.com /
Subscribe to Voting News at this link:
http://tinyurl.com/votingnews
To assist with Daily Voting News, please send links to news articles to us at votingnews@earthlink.net
Refresh | +7 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-17-10 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. Tell ME
so the census is supposed to set the standard for re-districting. How many times can a state draw the re-districting lines. Remember after 2000 Tom Delay was instrumental about re-districting lines, in Texas not once but twice. The first time he didn't get enough republican districts so they redrew them, so did Colorado and some other states.

Wonder what would happen if democrats tried that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Sep 18th 2014, 07:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC