Hi all, my first topic, hope this is new to you all
I did a search on
www.newscientist.com for Diebold.
All the articles are pre election, but they raise a lot of the points that are being raised now, and I guess in a way that makes them look less like "sour grapes" as some would categorise the whole 'votegate 2004' thing.
full list of articles (search query so may not work, if not, just type diebold in the news search on the main page)
<
http://www.newscientist.com/news/search/dosearch.jsp?ad... >
<
http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99996593 >
US boosts e-voting software security
28 October 04
<
http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99996523 >
Analysis: The great American e-voting experiment
16 October 04
<
http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99994584 >
Wireless e-voting machines raise concern
20 January 04
<snip>
Computer scientists are concerned that new electronic voting machines - already bought by several US states - have been designed to have the capability to transmit vote tallies wirelessly.
Critics of e-voting have previously cited uncertified software upgrades or bugs in the programs as problems, but they say the new touchscreen machines' wireless potential poses a novel security threat.
The makers of the new machines, Diebold Electronic Voting Systems in Canton, Ohio, point out that none of the AccuVote-TSx machines currently contain the matchbox-sized card required to make a wireless network connection.
But, unlike their predecessors, they do have a slot for the card, called a PCMCIA slot. And Diebold spokesperson Mark Radke told New Scientist that wireless capability could be implemented "if required by the jurisdiction" simply by inserting a card and configuring the machine.
...
The AccuVote-TSx is also awaiting federal approval and, if certified, will be used in November in the US presidential election. However, there are currently no plans to certify machines fitted with wireless cards.
<snip>
Does anyone know if any of these machines were used? If so they represent a HUGE security risk.
Another thought I had was that we should write to New Scientist and see if they are doing a story on the post election stories. They carry a lot of weight over here in the UK, and most MSN sources will take notice. They also produce excellent graphs and are great at explaining statistical evidence to the layman.