|
Edited on Wed Mar-23-05 01:50 AM by autorank
That 1/2 is the problems with the Republican nomination. On one side, you have high appeal/name recognition candidates McCain and Guliani. They are both unacceptable to the Social Conservatives, McCain out of their habit to oppose and Guliani because of his unacceptable (to them) personal life. McCain has additional problems in that he's a hypocrite on campaign contributions and Guliani has the Bernard Kerik association and the opposition of New York City voters. On the other side, you have Frist, corporate fat cat (and cat killer). He is a man without much appeal, an "empty shirt."
You say Kerry,Clinton,Bayh,Edwards,and Obama are the Democratic backbone. I beg to differ. The first three supported the war resolution that is the author of our current and future pain. No two ways about it, they were all foolish enough to get suckered by George W. Bush. As the horror unfolds and we realize that we lost lives and billions of dollars to install a pro Iran, Shia theocracy which asks us to leave Iraq, anyone who stood with Bush will lose credibility. Obama is to young and, quite frankly, to much of an opportunist.
These folks will see events quickly pass them by and discredit their judgment at the same time.
We don't know who our new leaders are going to be, our "backbone" as you call it. For once, they will emerge from the will of the party and the people. I say it's time for
NEW LEADERS FOR A NEW DEMOCRATIC PARTY
|