Can we move to Impeach now?????

[KerryReallyWon]

what more can they do to warrant it?

[Name removed]

1. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[meganmonkey]

3. Why not?

[Fosamax5]

6. Who's going to do it???

The REPUBLICAN controlled House or the REPUBLICAN controlled Senate??? We don't have enough votes to do JACK!

[meganmonkey]

11. If ONE more Dem had voted against Gonzales today

he would not have been confirmed (is that right? They had 60 yays I think...?!). It's not as controlled as it looks. And given the polls lately about disapproval of Bush**, the War, the SOTU address, it is clear that a growing number of Americans (including Congresspeople) are waking up to the reality that Bushco does not represent a majority. The politicians, even the Repukes, are waking up to this - and as the 2006 congressional election gets closer, they will HAVE to start paying attention to what the people want. We only need a few Repukes. And Bushco will not relent - they're nuts. They just keep digging themselved deeper and deeper. And everyone knows they lie like the devil and people are dying needlessly for it. It can't go on for 4 more years. It is unsustainable.

You may call me a ridiculous optimist, or delusionary, I don't care. I refuse to believe that things can't change, otherwise there would be nothing to fight for. And I am not giving up.

KEEP HOPE ALIVE

[qwghlmian]

22. No, you're wrong about the vote -

the confirmation needs simple majority. If all Democrats voted against, Gonzales would still have been confirmed.

[meganmonkey]

32. Well, that's that then.

But I still stand by everything else I said ;)

[New Earth]

13. why do you have "osama" in your name?

:shrug:

[Fosamax5]

18. never noticed it

I'm an orthopedic RN with severe osteoporosis. Fosamax is one of the newer bone building medications. You're not in the medical field, are you??

[New Earth]

24. nope

CYA!

[Career Prole]

4. Nixon probably felt the same confidence. n/t

[karynnj]

5. But he didn't have a Republican house and senate

and the republicans were a more diverse group including many liberals.

[Career Prole]

7. Nope...but there's only so much crime you can allow

before you become guilty yourself. When DimSon crosses that line a sufficient number of normal republicans will refuse to cross with him.
They need votes too, after all, and aren't limited to two four-year terms.

[FreedomAngel82]

27. Maybe we can start researching some of these

republicans who are supporting Bush and maybe find out if they have any criminal offenses or something? :shrug: Here in TN either later this year or coming up soon we're supposed to be voting for a new Senator, so I wonder who will get replaced. I'm hoping Frist.

[icehenge]

41. I read..

That Sen First plans to not run in 2006. Seems
he only wanted to be a Sen for so many years..
So yes his seat will be open it seems.

[texpatriot2004]

35. Never say never and welcome to DU n/t

[meganmonkey]

2. Yes please!

I second that.

[beyurslf]

8. Do you really think the Repubs would vote to impeach their president?

[Joe Chi Minh]

42. Don't you think it is in the interests

of Republican politicians for the country not to sink into ever deeper recession, while the country's hemorrhaging economic life-blood is draining into the sand in Iraq, along with that of your service people? Or is "Show me the money!" an utterance that would never pass through their innocent wee minds?

Rightly or wrongly, the impression I have is that capitalising Halliburton, Bechtel, the Carlyle Group, etc., alone, may satisfy the neocons personally, but that they must share the view that, unless they can set up a successfully-expanding empire over there, the national balance sheet will be too insanely crimson for those who would normally support them. And a successful empire is no longer remotely feasible. Even the endless raids on the oil pipelines are being used by the freedom-fighters as a cosh, to further financially penalise and mock the US. Capisce, F33040?

[troubleinwinter]

9. "we"? Who's "we"? Citizens do not move to impeach. Read.

Try google 'impeach' and 'impeachment'.

[Liberty Belle]

14. It seems to be a popular topic on Google:

Results 1 - 10 of about 156,000 for "Impeach Bush". (0.14 seconds)

[mousie]

21. google has 241,000! :) n/t

[El Fuego]

10. After elections in 2006, we impeach!

We have to pick up enough seats. I heard Randi Rhodes say today that all 52 of California's seats are up for election in 2006.

[Liberty Belle]

15. No wonder the Rethugs want a new Sec. of State in CA.

They need to rig our elections in time to stop a DEM revolt in '06.

[flyarm]

31. thats why calif is trying to redistricting right now!!

calif people better stay on top of the redistricting that the repugs are attempting right now..take it froma floridian..ole arnuld is trying to pull a swift one on you ..stop them in their tracts..or kiss your state good bye like those of us in fla texas, colorado..we know first hand how this gerrymandering hurts us!!

stay on top of it calif..

fly

[tritsofme]

20. Um all 435 seats are up for reelection in 2006

Like they are every 2 years.

I doubt we can retake the House then, because there are very few seats are actually competitve.

In 2004 IIRC only 3 incumbents were defeated.

[El Fuego]

38. Good to know

I thought maybe they were staggered.

[Liberty Belle]

12. Impeachment links: Sign petition, lobby Congress, buy impeach Bush goods

IMPEACH BUSH!
Ramsey Clark has almost half a million signatures.
Please sign and forward this link to others:
http://www.votetoimpeach.org/

More on how you can help persuade Congress to impeach Bush:
http://www.impeach-bush-now.org/

From FreePress.net:
Ask your Senators & Congressional member to investigate "payola pundits" (journalists taking taxpayer money to promote Administration propaganda): http://www.freepress.net/action/callcongress.php?a=nopayola

Choose from 610 impeach Bush items to buy at:
http://www.cafepress.com/cp/browse/?Nao=1&No=1&Nty=1&N=0&Ntk=All&Ntt=impeach+bush&x=16&y=12


Please forward this info around the planet, all.

[Langley85]

16. Clinton

Clinton was impeached for lying about sex, but Bush can't be impeached for lying about a war which has gotten well over 1,000 of our soldiers killed, and more almost every single day?

[Name removed]

19. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[roguevalley]

17. we need to win the house and senate back. make sure you work

for someone in the 2006 elections. only then can it happen.

[troubleinwinter]

23. This is important!!!!!!

[NationalEnquirer]

39. If we dont make significant gains in 2006...

I'm gonna jump off a bridge.
If after all this, we get no traction, then it is beyond all hope, and I am moving to Germany.

[stillcool]

25. What a sorry excuse for a congress

and a president and a surpreme court. Maybe we'll need outside help. The way things are looking we'll probably get it. It should be interesting to see (if we're still here), what it will look like a year from now, oh hell, a month from now!

[FreedomAngel82]

28. Interesting

Is there any way that can happen? The Iraq war is illegal after all...would anybody be brave enough? What if enough of us ask for help?

[FreedomAngel82]

26. I wish so too

But like someone else pointed out the republicans control the House. And you know good and well if it was a democrat doing the SAME things as Bush that democrat would be gone in a heartbeat! :grr: Bush lied to EVERYBODY last night. Why can't we get him? :cry: I feel sorry for whoever has to clean up the mess Bush makes. At least the dems aren't rolling over (well except for those who voted for Gonalzez).

[NGU]

29. Yes, finally

Call your congressmen!

Sign the petition on the internet!

Tell the people the Truth!

Just don't give up!

[Rocky Top]

30. We can move to Impeach in 2006

Its going to take a lot of work. WE CAN do it.

[bush_is_wacko]

34. that's the goal! And I am in the process of making that very clear to

Senator Salazar. His vote has just put him on the list of Dem's that will require replacement, along with the thugs who were already there. Anyone know someone that could run as a Republican and then ACT like a Democrat? In Colorado the Senator that Salazar replaced did the exact opposite. He ran as a Dem, got elected as a Dem, and then switched to a thug!

[Lisabtrucking]

33. He is a liar, and the proof is in the picture.

<>

[texpatriot2004]

36. I think we can. Did you sign up at impeachbush.org?

[texpatriot2004]

37. Link to impeachment countdown website

http://www.pnionline.com/dnblog/extra/

[seriousstan]

40. Didn't this thread start Dec. 13 2000?

I coulkd have sworn I heard about this before. What ever happen with that effort?

[Pacifist Patriot]

43. As soon as the Democrats retake the legislature in 2006.

Lets get moving on fair and transparent elections!