Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Nader Challenges M. Moore to Walk the Walk........

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
grumpy old fart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 09:52 AM
Original message
Nader Challenges M. Moore to Walk the Walk........
and back up his talk:

<snip>
Here you were -- against the Iraq War occupation, pro-justice for the Palestinian people, against the Patriot Act, against the swollen military budget and you were telling the university students to vote for Kerry who is on the complete opposite side of these issues.

Now that you no longer have to pose as a “least-worster”, with no more tactical excuses, what is your post-election confession? So far your website has dodged this question, unless that is you have no reflections on the merit of abandoning both your principles and your authentically progressive friends for candidates – - Kerry and Edwards—who so often performed as crypto-Republicans during the campaign.
<snip>

Michael, you have to rehabilitate yourself and remove the stains of your political apostasy. Get off your self-demeaning “Bill Maher Show knees” and once again confront the forces of corporate power and domination. Jettison your image as the Court Jester for the Democratic Party and its serial, crude violations of other candidates’ civil liberties to be on the ballot, to express their freedom of speech regarding a just society and world inside the electoral arena without being subjected to dirty tricks, hired corporate law firms, phony lawsuits, harassment and intimidation of signature gatherers.

Redeem yourself or forever be consigned to history’s judgment of political turncoats, renegades and saboteurs.


http://votenader.org/why_ralph/index.php?cid=175
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
1. this from the man who said there was no diff between Gore and Bush
I see Ralph is still living in his fantasy world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pocoloco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Where are Ralph's observations not right on?
Inquiring minds would like to know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
14. The Iraq war.
Nader said Gore would have done the same thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
electropop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
27. Nader's got guts
he's never been afraid to speak the truth. I hope he runs next time, maybe for the Greens again. Kerry has lost my vote by ducking out on the single most important campaign promise he made: to count the votes. Like Nader, I thought of Kerry as barely a dem, but anything's better than Bush. Now I feel free to vote my conscience, since it'll never be counted anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grumpy old fart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Dems and Repugs both in corporate pockets....
Did ya notice how fast Kerry conceded? Did ya notice the tepid campaign? Don't ya wish we'd run someone with balls and a backbone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grumpy old fart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. By the way, God bless Conyers....a man with balls and a backbone. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seaveggie Donating Member (21 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Right on.
Amen, Grump.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #1
10. Amen. Ralph gave bush a leg up into the WH four years ago
after he was all but begged to put the interests of the nation above his ego. And then ridiculed Gore for "losing." He's a big reason we are where we are today. He's not someone to be lecturing others who actually put the country first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
regularjoe Donating Member (358 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. With instant runoff voting it wouldn't be possible to be a "spoiler."
Which is much more fair because you shouldn't have to worry about whether running for office is going to hurt your nation.

A cool flash demo of IRV
<http://www.chrisgates.net/irv/>

regularjoe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seaveggie Donating Member (21 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
5. This is really important stuff for all progressives
Edited on Wed Dec-15-04 10:38 AM by seaveggie
Ralph is not a nutcase. Ralph is really on target here.

Look, we're staring down at a very, very dangerous period for our country. The real deal is here. History has turned with this election (which, stolen or not, is starting to look like a fait de compli), and it has turned for the worse. The supreme court. Patriot Act 2. The global assault on the environment - these things have passed the planning stage and have entered the implementation stage. The war in Iraq will continue to be a horror-filled experience for many Americans and Iraqis. Who knows what the next years will bring in terrorist activity. And what other countries do the neocons have in their sites now?

And here we sit, in the early days of a forming, increasingly active, strengthening movement, with tremendous potential, and which is starting to realize its power. Look how we shut Sinclair down. Look how we almost (and without the election thievery, would have) thrown the neocons out of the gov't. Imagine what we will do in the coming year, all via peaceful, organized protest. We can change the country. Mass movements have always led the way for progressive change. Political leaders have always followed.

Ralph is RIGHT. Kerry/Edwards were saying nothing about American foreign policy, about the increasing dominance of corporate power, about the dangerous repercussions we face because of our foreign policy misdeeds. In fact, they both voted for those misdeeds...We all know the laundry list! The Democratic party is not up to the task. They are a corporate party. We need leaders, honest, progressive leaders, and we need a mass movement of energized, anti-corporate, grass-roots pressure, and it ain't gonna come from the DNC...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gingergreen Donating Member (125 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Here here!!
I think we should all turn our focus to the Progressive Democrats of America.

Check out http://www.pdamerica.org/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seaveggie Donating Member (21 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Interersting site
Never saw this site, thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. Thanks for the link
I have sent it off to some friends.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bear425 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #7
28. Ginger, I just joined and signed the petition. Thanks! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Griffy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
19. Ralph is right.. BUT, he attacks the front gate! being right isnt enough
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kralizec Donating Member (982 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
9. Nader has been trying to light a fire up progressives' asses for
his whole life. For those of you still young, imagine fighting like you have for this election, but for most of your life. Now Imagine, by the time that you are Nader's age, you'd have to be a bit bitter at the fact that Americans are lazy and never get off their couches or even pay attention to what their gov't is doing. Heck, I've been doing this for two years and I'm already bitter...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grumpy old fart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Amen brother....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
13. Just when I was starting to like Nader again...
...he puts his foot in his mouth again.

Nader is mad that Moore saw him as a self-absorbed opportunist who got even less votes this time around than in 2000.

Poor fucking baby...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
15. So, Ralphie, about those New Hampshire recounts....
people here cheered him when he chose to challenge a Kerry win (and not say, Florida). OK, where's the beef? Where did YOU walk, Ralphie?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
regularjoe Donating Member (358 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. He was asked and advised to start with New Hampshire by activists.
It was relatively inexpensive, small, and looked suspicious so it was a good place to start. Don't blame Nader. He responded to pleading activists. I respect that.

regularjoe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. So, it was the mistake of several people - just as I said at the time.
nader delivered squat. Why is blaming MM OK? At least MM worked with us and against W?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
regularjoe Donating Member (358 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. Nader did deliver, but no fraud was found....
And it sounds like he respects what MM was doing before the election and would like to see a little more of it now, after the election.

regularjoe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noiretextatique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #15
29. i must have missed all the recounts kerry demanded
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noiretextatique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
16. a timely message for all the conceders and enablers
as usual, ralph gets the heart of the matter. i will save this article for the next "we should abandon x group to attract y group" thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. From a W enabler? And his point is?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noiretextatique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. there are a quite few W enablers
with "D's" behind their names. i do believe that is one of his points, for those able to hear it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconoclastNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
17. Who takes Nader seriously?
He gets funding from Republicans, he has almost no support.

Even if Michael Moore is the court joker of the Democratic party, he gets our side of the story in front of more eyeballs than crotchety old Nader ever will.

If we have to resort to theatrics and agitprop to get people to see our point of view, then that's what we need to do. We don't have the massive propaganda machine the republicans have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
info being Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
23. Well-said Ralph!
We compromised our values for this election. Time to go back to our roots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quakerfriend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Exactly!
For years, we've all known that what he has been saying for years is true..........re: corp owned media etc.

We all need to get off of our "bums" and walk the walk. Demand multiple presidential candidates, support ethical corps. (if there are any!), give up our SUV's etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alizaryn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
30. ouch
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC