Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What if Blair was never under the spell of Bush

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Places » United Kingdom Donate to DU
 
Jeneral2885 Donating Member (598 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 04:25 AM
Original message
What if Blair was never under the spell of Bush
and did not join him in invading Iraq? How would the UK hqave turned out then? Would that have ended the special relationship?
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Hopeless Romantic Donating Member (495 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 06:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. Would he still be in office?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
miscsoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I tend to think he would be.
I wonder how much damage the recession would have done him, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
demo_6725 Donating Member (3 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-11 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 07:58 AM
Response to Original message
2. It would have created tensions, but no, I don't think so
Of course, such things are a matter of degree. Harold Wilson didn't join Johnson and Nixon in the Vietnam War, and it didn't end the 'special relationship'. But he did not oppose the war, either; if he had, it might have caused more problems in the relationship.

The French opposed the war, and patriotic Americans started eating Freedom Fries; but they seem to be back on good terms now.

At any rate, fewer people would have been killed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Jeneral2885 Donating Member (598 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Yeah Freedom Fries
So if Blair dint sign the pact with Bush i wonder what names they would have conjured for a UK icon?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Texas Pudding instead of Yorkshire Pudding?
Freedom Muffins?

Freedom 'n Chips?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
demo_6725 Donating Member (3 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-11 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
10.  +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Nihil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-31-11 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. That third post must have been a beauty!
Tombstoned with 3 posts and two of them consisted of "+1" in this thread! :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
T_i_B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 07:25 AM
Response to Original message
6. We might still have gone into Afghanistan
but we wouldn't have got involved in Iraq. Blair might still have resigned in time to avoid the effect of the credit crunch on his reputation though. And also, David Miliband might not have had quite so much baggage from his time at the foreign office and might have been able to become Labour leader as a result.

Another thing is that without throwing money at military action in Iraq, we might not be facing quite such harsh cuts.

All hypothetical though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 06:15 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. All hypothetical though...
Sound reasoning just the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
LSdemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-11 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
8. Can we stop pretending that this was all a one-way thing?
If anything Blair was and always has been fairly eager to use military force to "solve" problems. Bush and Blair egged each other on.

Remember Kosovo? Clinton was the one holding Blair back from sending in ground troops, not the other way around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Jeneral2885 Donating Member (598 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-29-11 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Really?
I thought Clinton was all out into using force in Kosovo--or was that NATO Commander Clark
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » United Kingdom Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC