Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Voter id.Is it the issue that turns my Blue state red?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Places » Wisconsin Donate to DU
 
gizmo1979 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-05 08:42 PM
Original message
Voter id.Is it the issue that turns my Blue state red?
If they get just 2% of the minority vote to disappear that turns the entire state repug.I think this is an important issue flying under our radar.Don't get fooled again!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Maria Celeste Donating Member (104 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-05 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. Not sure what is so wrong with IDs
If we are really interested in a clean vote, we should support some sort of voter ID, and perhaps even logging. Consider:

- Easy cross check of # of ballots vs # of people who voted
- No more voting from the grave
- Kills objections to motor voter and same day registration.

If we want a clean and accountable process, Voter IDs will have to be part of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RetroLounge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-05 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. We haven't needed them in over 200 years
so why now? and why a Repug issue?

It's just the Repugs framing the issue. THEY are the ones with the Diebold machines and the ones who steal elections, but then whine about election Fraud.

It is all about minority disenfranchisement.

To believe otherwise is bullshit.

RL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maria Celeste Donating Member (104 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-05 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. How so?
If someone is legal to vote, requiring proof is not discriminatory if it is required of everyone. I also don't see it as a repug issue as much as an establishment issue. Chicago is not repug country and they are famous for the voting dead.

Open voting systems with cross checks are a step in the right direction. Can't really have that without verification of eligibility at the polling place.

Fundamentally I want clean elections since I believe that when we do, the progressive side will the one claiming a mandate. If the repugs want to help speed that along, all the better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MessiahRp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-05 01:53 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I think it's conflicting
The way the lunatic Right in the Assembly are pushing this, there is no chance for this to be used as some sort of fair system.

Sure in concept the universal ID is not a bad idea but it ends up being just another way for the Government to control your vote and ability to do so and that could be dangerous considering who owns the media, the voting machines and who controls many of the Secretary of State positions that would purposely force counties to cheat for the guy they're campaigning for.

Also to me it's like another way for the FBI to racially profile citizens.

On the surface it sounds good but when you read into the intentions of these wackos, it gets scarier by the moment.

Rp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maria Celeste Donating Member (104 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-05 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Perhaps I am being over optimistic, but...
The repugs are convinced that they are not getting the landslide they deserve due to "illegal" voters. Many of us believe that the repugs are guilty of a wide variety of vote fraud. Unlike a lot of societal issues, this is one where things can be addressed quantitatively with the support of technology. Diebold is superb example of it should not be done. However, that does not mean a fair system with checks and safe guards can not be built. However as part of it, voter identification and authentication will have to be done.

Luddite rants about by some on both sides about paper ballots was good enough for the last whatever years is simply an invitation for more of what we have seen in the last two elections. Effective and fair solutions can be developed if we choose to. I tend to think those (on both sides) who are resistant to building a honest polling system are afraid that somehow their side will lose power. Have to wonder why Move On and others have not stepped up with an alternative approach. If Dean becomes DNC chair, I hope he takes this on.

As for the optimistic part, I believe that if the polls were indisputably honest we would win.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-06-05 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. No, no, no

"The repugs are convinced that they are not getting the landslide they deserve due to "illegal" voters. "

This statement is wrong, they aren't convinced of that at all, they merely proclaim that as a miss-direction and cite as the need for the cards....they KNOW they can't disenfranchise enough people to win without the cards, that's the only reason they are screaming...do not take what they say as truth, it's all talking points to mislead...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RetroLounge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-05 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Chicago famous for the voting dead?
Really. Got statistics? How many over how many years, how many elections, which dead? Which way did they vote? Are the dead more independant or do they lean left or right? Did you see any dead vote? Do you know any dead who voted?

or maybe it's just a funny story that happenned back in 1960 and now gets repeated by every single right wing media whore and bought by the compliant sheep?

Baaaaaaahhhhhhh.

RL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mark414 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-05 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. it's hard for people who have never had a problem with their license
to understand why this is such a big issue

come to milwaukee and talk to some folks for a few minutes...and you'll see just how important it is that this DOESN'T pass
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maria Celeste Donating Member (104 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-05 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Wisconsin
Can't be worse than DC DMV or the MVA. Its just not possible... :-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mark414 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-05 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. it's not the DMV
over 50% of black men in jail in Milwaukee are there for driving while under revocation...it seems that's their solution for any crime here, just take their licenses away

this is about disenfranchisement and disenfranchisement only
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-05 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. It is a means for Repugs to intimidate voters
That is the only purpose for the ID requirement by them. Once enacted it gives them a tool to intimidate without recrimination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrGonzoLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #2
22. And we've had electoral funny business for over 200 years
How is it about minority disenfranchisement? I hear this all the time, yet nothing to back it up. Most already have a photo I.D., it's called a driver's license.

You have to show a driver's license to do all kinds of stuff, why not voting?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gizmo1979 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. Go down to Milwaukee and ask
non-white people to see an id.They don't trust government,.with just cause i might add
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mark414 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-13-05 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. it's not so much that...
as it is the courts being all too willing to strip someone of their license for a completely unrelated offense.

over 50% of black men in jail in milwaukee are there for driving with a revoked license

a good friend of mine's husband has been in jail 3 times in the past year because they don't have enough money to pay off ridiculous fines he has gotten for no reason, but he still has to go to work so he has no other choice but to drive. and it doesn't help him any that he's black so of course he's never going to get a second chance or get off with a warning or anything like that, ESPECIALLY not in milwaukee
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RetroLounge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-05 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. Then you go ahead and work for it in Maryland
We'll take care of Wisconsin.

RL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maria Celeste Donating Member (104 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-05 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. I shall
After many disappoints on the national level, I have started to focus my efforts on local things. IME, Senators and Congress Critters tend to lose their connection to the electorate rapidly. I don't really trust any of them.

Local politics and efforts seem to be much more effective. Also people can see the results where they live. Unfortunately, MD is backwards in some of its structure, limiting what can be done locally. Power is really concentrated in the state level (there is a name for the structure that I can find at the moment). I also intend to get back out of MD to a better area in the next few years, for the sake my children if nothing else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gizmo1979 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-05 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. You don't get it.
Ask yourself why would repugs be pushing this so hard?They know minorities will stay away all they need is 2% in Wisconsin and then the state is theirs.This is part of the bastards big scheme to dominate for along time!They know they can't win the minority vote.So their only hope is to disenfranchise!THIS IS BAD!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RetroLounge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-05 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Agreed.
All politics is local.

RL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-05 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. ID is required when registering to vote for the first time
That should be sufficient

Precincts are not the size of medium sized cities that election officers don't know who is a resident in the precinct. If an election officer has reason or knowledge that the person is not the voter then they should challenge. If a person in line knows of a person that is not who they say they are then they should alert the officials.

Voters sign in to receive a ballot. If that signature does not appear to be the signature of the voter then the election officer should challenge.

If precinct committee persons do their job they would keep a list of those that die within in their precinct and have it available on election day for their people to challenge.

ID requirement WON'T prevent # of ballots not matching # of people voting. That is a problem of election officers not paying attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sybylla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-07-05 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #13
18. ID isn't requried to register, only the numbers from your ID
You do not have to show any ID to register, you only have to have your DL# or the last 4 digits of your SS#. That's it. ID had not been required at all when registering to vote until 2003 and since then it has only been required in a few municipalities. I have never, ever had to provide anything but proof of residency to vote in 23 years. HAVA will now require that all municipalities collect that ID info when you register but you still do not have to show photo ID.

And I agree - that should be sufficient. If poll workers are properly trained and have all the tools they need at hand to insure proper voting, nothing further is needed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrGonzoLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #18
23. If, if, if
If poll workers are trained - are they supposed to know everyone in a precinct?

Backin Indiana, all you have to do is tell the worker your name and address, then sign the sheet. You have no idea how ridiculously easy that system would be to abuse. It's not like they have a master signature list so they no if a signature is false, and I seriously doubt any local government has the means to higher experts to go over all signatures from all precincts in an area to see if there is any fraud going on.

Believe me, if it's cheaper to check for photo ID's at polling stations, state and local governments will want it. They like saving money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sybylla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. the key words were proof of residency
If the poll worker doesn't know me and I can show my cable bill, my tax bill or my lease with the same name and address as appears on their registration list, then I should be able to vote. And yeah, in my precinct, the nice ladies who work the polls know just about everybody in the district because they've lived here forever. They'd know if your story reeked of BS. They'd know if your address was bogus. They'd know if your name was unfamiliar. And they do their job.

I read the stories in the Journal Sentinel the past few weeks. All of the problems the paper is whining about (bad addresses, poor record keeping) could have been resolved if the poll workers did their job. Perhaps they could have done their job better if the pukes didn't have their poll watchers breathing down their necks all day long.

My problem with ID is that requiring proof of anything disenfranchises the homeless and the transient. The cry for ID gets legs only because puke legislators cry about some great Dem conspiracy to bring fraudulent voters to the polls. I must have missed that meeting.

Just as I prefer my justice system to err on the side of letting a criminal go rather than convict an innocent person, I'd prefer a voting system that let a few vote improperly over a system that prevented even one person who had the right to vote from doing so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-06-05 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
16. They wouldn't be so hyped up about them if there
Edited on Sun Feb-06-05 11:02 PM by EC
weren't an underlying agenda...they also know it will result in less Democratic votes, since many are from lower working class, who don't have the time to take off work to get an picture ID, many of whom move around allot and will have to get a new ID each time to keep address currant, and they are talking about a fee for them also...

Plus I worry that this is a lead-in to a national ID...


on edit: and the states they are really pushing this in are the ones they lost by only a few percentage points...what does that tell you? It's amazing they KNOW they lost because dead people voted...isn't it a secret ballot? Those dead people they love to talk about most likely voted R...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shoelace414 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. And I saw no audit of Waukesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suffragette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 04:29 AM
Response to Reply #16
20. reason to be concerned
I'm not from Wisconsin, but I started seeing the issue of voter ID coming up more frequently. I started looking into it and quickly started hitting articles about national ID. I think you're right to be concerned.
Legislation has already passed to standardize state driver's licenses and state issued ID cards so as to create a de facto national ID. Now there is additional legislation being pushed to make the requirements for that more stringent. Sensenbrenner's bill on this is on the floor of the House already.
At the same time, there are strong pushes in some states to mandate more specific Voter ID. From what I've read of the Wisconsin bill, it restricts that ID to the same ID that is to be standardized.
I posted a longer piece with the pertinent links here:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=203x323026

I am becoming very concerned by these developments and think we will need to address them at both the state and federal levels.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shoelace414 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Sensenbrenner represents Wisconsin
and he's making invalid Wisconsin's drivers licence as a valid state ID
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suffragette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-13-05 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. Not exactly. He's twisting the arms of the states to give over state
control of deciding ID issuance to the Feds.
If passed, HR 418 will give the states this choice, stop issuing driver's licenses to undocumented immigrants or have your state ID cards and driver's licenses unacceptable as federal ID. He's counting on the states that currently issue licenses to undocumented immigrants to no longer issue these by the threat to invalidate state licenses and ID cards for use in boarding planes or entering federal courts, etc.

Here's the pertinent section on that from Sec 202:
(11) In any case in which the State issues a driver's license or identification card that does not satisfy the requirements of this section, ensure that such license or identification card--

(A) clearly states on its face that it may not be accepted by any Federal agency for any official purpose; and

(B) uses a unique design or color indicator to alert Federal agency and other law enforcement personnel that it may not be accepted for any such purpose.

Here's a link to whole bill:
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c109:h418:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Wisconsin Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC