Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wild Sky measure is killed in House

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Places » Washington Donate to DU
 
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-23-04 07:19 PM
Original message
Wild Sky measure is killed in House
Thought you were going to score points on this one Nethercutt? Fuck you asshole. You're going down.

Divided state delegation trades charges on fault

By CHARLES POPE
SEATTLE POST-INTELLIGENCER WASHINGTON BUREAU

WASHINGTON -- A popular drive to create Washington state's first new wilderness area in 20 years collapsed yesterday after a House committee refused to consider a compromise offered by Rep. George Nethercutt, touching off a fierce exchange of accusations and sharply differing accounts of who is to blame.

The daylong barrage commenced minutes after Resources Committee Chairman Richard Pombo, R-Calif., withdrew legislation sponsored by Nethercutt to create the 106,000-acre Wild Sky Wilderness and Backcountry area. Pombo said he acted after being told that the Washington delegation couldn't resolve differences over competing bills.


The demise of the Wild Sky legislation -- at least for this year -- dashed once-promising prospects for providing the highest level of federal protection for 106,000 acres in the Skykomish River Valley northeast of Seattle and exposed raw relations within the delegation.

At the center of the skirmish were two forces. One is the effort, originally championed by Rep. Rick Larsen, D-Wash., to preserve the land. The other is election-year politics, fueled by Democrats who are convinced that Nethercutt is trying to exploit the issue to help him win the Senate seat held by incumbent Patty Murray.

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/192087_wildsky23.ht...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Democratic discussion forum
   Replies to this thread
  - So why is leaving land unprotected a good thing?  aquart   Sep-23-04 07:27 PM   #1 
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-23-04 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. So why is leaving land unprotected a good thing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 25th 2013, 01:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Washington Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC