Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Would the loss of 3000 jobs in Sealy make Rep. McCaul vulnerable?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Places » Texas Donate to DU
 
Jane Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-08-09 02:36 PM
Original message
Would the loss of 3000 jobs in Sealy make Rep. McCaul vulnerable?
Here's a link to a summary of all the things McCaul did not do to save the 3000 jobs at the Sealy BAE plant.

It seems to me that this could make him really vulnerable next year.

Could he get a single vote in or around Sealy?

http://www.lonestarproject.net/

McCaul (R-Clear Channel)is my representative in Congress, and I'd sure like to see a Dem representing us there.
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
sonias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-08-09 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. You do know about Jack MacDonald right?
He's our Democratic candidate in this race against McCaul. Third time is a charm I hope. Yes McCaul should be vulnerable, but it really takes a good ground game. Hope you sign up to help Jack win.

He's had a good showing at fundraising too

http://www.jackforcongress.com/


Sonia
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Jane Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-08-09 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Thanks, Sonia.
I'm looking forward to it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
sonias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-08-09 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Jack McDonald - name spelling correction
Sorry for the typo.

Sonia
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
martymar64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-10-10 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. His site announced he's not going to run this election.
It's too bad. I was gerrymandered into McCaul's district and that chaps my hide to no end.

I hope somebody emerges soon to challenge McCaul.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
sonias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-10-10 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. You know McDonald bailed but Ted Ankrum filed to run
Ted is a wonderful guy stepping in to take another run at McCaul. Get behind him. This district is winnable, it's not that secure for McCaul despite the original gerrymandering.

BOR Diary 1/5/10

Why I Filed for TX-10 by Ted Ankrum
by: Ted Ankrum

I never expected to do this. It was so unlikely that I had let the domain name registration tedankrum.com lapse. Of course, it was picked up by a porno site. I did it because Michael McCaul is such a bad Representative he should never be allowed to run unopposed. That was the theme of the radio interview I did on KWHI radio this morning (there is some advantage to having run in '06 and being in people's rolodex's). Now, I'm scrambling to register with the FEC (this came together on the Sunday before filing closed), so that I can get an ACTBlue page. Kernan Hornberg is working on a template for a website. Thank goodness I had not closed the bank account (because I still had campaign debts from 2006)so I was able to write the filing fee check from a Campaign account. Jack McDonald provided a substantial part of the money for that, with some more for the General Election Campaign and Ron Coldiron the rest.

The '06 Campaign put me on record for many things and if one Googles Ted Ankrum, much of that remains. Many of my positions will need to be updated, though. I think the Senate Health Care Plan leaves much to be desired, but if that is what we get; take it for now and fix it later--in particular the part that still keeps health care costs on the backs of our companies. We always seem to be one war behind. We fought Iraq when we should have finished Afganistan when it was easy. The most recent attack came from Yemen, just as we are ramping up in Afganistan. Our President says that Afganistan is not Vietnam or Iraq and I agree with him. It's mired in the time of Alexander the Great and it breaks my heart that our troops are dying to prop up a feudal and corrupt regime. Our fight is with the terrorists, not the Taliban and we ought to concentrate on them where they are--and they aren't in Afganistan. I think there are far too few military veterans, and combat veterans in particular, among our political leaders. If there were more, there might be a different perspective on where and who we choose to fight. Our military leaders fight the wars they are presented with. Our political leaders are the ones that do the picking. There is more to discuss on Cap and Trade and Financial Regulation but I'll save all that for the future.

(snip)

I can't promise you that I'll win, but I will promise you to show just how bad a Representative Mike McCaul is. He ignored me in the '06 race and that let me knock 10% off his expected results. Ever since, he's looked vulnerable and attracted stronger opposition than I could give him. He really should have smacked me down in '06 and scared away any thought of opposing him. We'll see what happens this time.


Go read the complete diary.

Sonia
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
martymar64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-10-10 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Thanks for the info!
From what I've read about him so far is good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
sonias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-08-09 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
4. BOR thread on the job loss
BOR 12/08/09
TX-10: Michael McCaul Drops the Ball, Loses 3,000 Texas Jobs

Lone Star Project summary
Department of Defense has confirmed that McCaul failed to act
An official letter from the Department of Defense obtained by the Lone Star Project states that no record exists of Michael McCaul contacting the Department of Defense during the contract review process to advocate for BAE systems or to request fair consideration that the contract be renewed. (Source: DOD Freedom of Information Act Request, 10/14/2009 ) Additional research shows that McCaul also failed to take other basic steps Members of Congress normally take when trying to win support from their colleagues to protect District jobs.

* McCaul failed to appear before the House Budget Committee on “Member’s Day” where Representatives can advocate for programs important to their district. (Source: House Budget Committee Witness List )
* McCaul did not go to the House floor a single time to speak on behalf of the Texas/BAE contract or to defend Texas workers. (Source: Library of Congress)
* McCaul did not make any public statements or issue any press releases supporting BAE or the nearly 3,000 jobs covered under the contract. (Source: McCaul Website )


Seems like McCaul really screwed this up good. He can't claim he's a newbie either. He just got complacent.

Sonia
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
white cloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-10-10 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Asleep at the wheel
And we pay these guy with hard earned money, while they do nothing or very little, except fill there pocket while the are in office
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
sonias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
9. Michael McCaul's Negligence Causes Sealy BAE Systems Plant to Lose 3,000 Jobs
Well that's it - those jobs are gone now!
Burnt Orange Report 2/13/10
Michael McCaul's Negligence Causes Sealy BAE Systems Plant to Lose 3,000 Jobs

Key Points

1. BAE Systems lost their appeal with the Department of Defense on their contract to build military trucks called Family of Medium Tactical Vehicles (Source: Houston Chronicle) The contract was the largest federal contract in the 10th Congressional District.

2. The appeal came after an announcement last December about the contract loss (Source: "Michael McCaul Drops the Ball, Loses 3,000 Texas Jobs")

3. When it was first announced that BAE Systems would lose the contract, there was proof that no written communication -- or really any efforts -- had been made by Michael McCaul, Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison, Senator John Cornyn, or Governor Rick Perry to protect the contract and keep it in Texas. (Source: Lone Star Project & Austin American-Statesman)


Remember we have a very good Democratic candidate in Ted Ankrum running against this loser McCaul. This is Ted Ankrum on that same BOR thread:

Sealy News Voter's Guide by Ted Ankrum, McCaul's opponent
Please let me quote from my piece in the Sealy Times Voter's guide, which was published on Feb 10, before the final Army decision:
"The top challenge facing this District is jobs and I'll talk about that, in general, in your next question. But in Sealy, the biggest problem is British Aerospace's loss of the tactical truck contract. Just because you are a Congressman doesn't mean you know much about how the Defense Department and other federal agencies really work. If I had been the Representative, I would have known that the only large Defense contractor in the District was competing for a new generation of tactical trucks and I would have known what was happening about that contract. I would have found out that Oshkosh was sharpening it's pencil to give a very competitive bid and jacked up the management of British Aerospace to do the same. Instead, your Congressman was oblivious and British Aerospace was coasting on eight years of past history, rather than looking to a new environment. Oshkosh produces a good tactical truck that the troops in Afghanistan love. It's a capable company that deserved to be taken seriously by British Aerospace. Oshkosh offered a better deal for the American taxpayer, and no amount of after-the-bid protests by Congressman McCaul is going to change that. He, and the British Aerospace management team, were asleep at the switch. The people at the Sealy plant can make a truck that is as good or better than anything from Oshkosh but it's got to be competitive and Congressman McCaul didn't alert the management that the old days were over. The protests will run their course and the Sealy workforce may get another chance. But if they don't, does Congressman McCaul know that the Quadrennial Defense Review is going to recommend buying a new generation of more fuel efficient tactical trucks? That is the Sealy workforce's way forward and I can help. I spent two years in logistics at the Pentagon at the full Colonel-level. I know how it works."

Not two days after this piece appeared in the Sealy newspaper, the Army did exactly what I expected and upheld the award to Oshkosh. Anyone who knows anything about the Defense procurement process knows that after-the-fact political lobbying is never effective, unless the bidding process was crooked, as in the Boeing refueling tanker award. Mr. McCaul is a lazy Congressman who should have been riding point on the front end of this procurement. Instead, he just took the campaign contributions from British Aerospace and did nothing. Woops, he did do something: He blamed the Democrats for sabotaging Texas. I would suggest that this says quite a lot about the effectiveness of Republican leadership in Texas, and it's time for a change!


Ted's web site:
http://www.ankrum2010.com/


Sonia
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Texas Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC