|
Excerpts from the BOR interviews:
Question to Bell: What do you believe needs to be done to improve public education in Texas?
For starters, we need a real education reform commission, like we had back in 1984 under Mark White. Let’s have a real bipartisan commission with people from all walks of life that come together and figure out how we can have the best schools in the country in the next ten years.
But the unfortunate reality is that improving public education costs money. It’s not cheap, and if it was cheap then private schools wouldn’t be charging so much more for kids to go there than what we’re paying for kids to go to public school. At some point we’re going to need to elect a Governor that’s willing to put his money where his mouth is.
Question to Gammage: What do you believe needs to be done to improve public education in Texas?
One of my first priorities as Governor will be to propose legislation that we will call the Texas Excellence in Education Act. It's our policy as a commitment to excellence, not adequacy. Not what it takes simply to get by. If Texas has an excellent quality of education in public schools - from Pre-K through the universities - the entire state benefits. Every person in the state, every business, every enterprise, every capitalist in the state benefits from having a well-educated foundation that they can build on and invest in to improve their business.
If Texas were an independent nation, we'd have the eighth largest economy in the world. Not in the United States - the world. Yet, we're 40th among the states in what we invest in each student and public education. We're the only state that spent less this year than we did last year per student. Rick Perry is running around telling everyone how he's proud of Texas. Well, I'm proud of Texas, too, but I'm not proud of its current leadership, because we have no leadership. He's a failed leader on almost every issue, including education.
Question to Bell:Why do you feel we need to do away with high stakes testing in our public schools?
I know it would be a dramatic departure to leave high stakes testing after twenty years, but we need a dramatic departure. Experts in education are now saying it’s not even a matter of teaching to the test – it’s just teaching the test, and little else. We need to return to when kids gained knowledge from the curriculum of their courses, and we need teachers deciding whether they’ve passed those courses.
We’ll always have standardized testing – I’m not saying we should do away with that. It’s required by No Child Left Behind. But the high stakes nature of it is not required. It drives up the dropout rate and has gutted the curriculum, which is why moving away from high stakes testing is a huge priority for me.
Question to Gammage: Talk about your views on the following Republican-proposed school reform proposals: merit-based pay for teacher pay raises, the 65% rule for classroom spending, and voucher programs.
Crap, crap, and crap.
I'm sorry - those are deceptive, devious, and dishonest policies. You are not going to make better teachers by pitting teachers against one another. You're going to make better teachers by paying for excellence and then demanding excellence of every one of them. You're not going to improve schools with vouchers that take money out of the public revenue to invest in private school education. Then those people don't effectively pay any taxes to public education because they're getting the money back to put their kids in private school. It doesn't work that way.
There is much more at BOR in the links posted by Texas_Kat, above.
|