Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

OH Sen. adjusts absentee balloting:Hotly debated plan would require ID

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Places » Ohio Donate to DU
 
Algorem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-19-05 11:04 AM
Original message
OH Sen. adjusts absentee balloting:Hotly debated plan would require ID
Senate adjusts absentee balloting
Hotly debated plan would require ID

http://www.cleveland.com/news/plaindealer/index.ssf?/ba...

Wednesday, October 19, 2005
Julie Carr Smyth
Plain Dealer Bureau

Columbus - A bill expanding access to absentee voting - but with ID requirements and other restrictions missing from a proposed constitutional amendment - cleared the Ohio Senate after an unusually raucous session Tuesday.

Senate Democratic Leader C.J. Prentiss culminated a three-hour debate on the no-fault absentee voting bill by plastering masking tape across her face to symbolize the voter-suppression measures her caucus believes are in the bill. They argued that the ID requirement would be hardest on the poor and elderly.

The legislation, which heads to the House, would lift limits on the use of absentee ballots, but would also require identification to use them. It also excludes a 10-day grace period for receiving the ballots, which is contained in November's Issue 2.

Issue 2 is one of four constitutional amendments on the ballot backed by a predominantly Democratic group called Reform Ohio Now...



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-19-05 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. Go CJ
The ads are now in full swing and the Pee Dee is giving it as little coverage as possible. Koresh forbid Ohio voters might actually be represented in the state!

Interesting that they chose this particular issue to tackle by ramming through their phony legislation. Any ideas? Do they fear this one will be popular with voters?

Is there any polling data on how the Issues are playing with the public yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Aug 01st 2014, 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Ohio Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC