Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sherrod Brown kicks off Senate race with this speech in Mansfield, Ohio

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Places » Ohio Donate to DU
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-05 06:36 PM
Original message
Sherrod Brown kicks off Senate race with this speech in Mansfield, Ohio
U.S. Rep. Sherrod Brown came home to Mansfield today to formally launch his campaign for the U.S. Senate during a rally at Mansfield Senior High School.

Below is the complete text of the speech.

Let me tell you why I ran for office in this city 31 years ago.

And let me tell you why I still fight for the values that we all share.

Every day when I go to work, I wear on my lapel—not the congressional symbol that most of my colleagues wear—but this small pin which depicts a canary in a cage.

One hundred years ago American coal miners took a canary down into the mine with them. If the canary died, it meant the air in the mine was toxic, and the miners knew they had to get out—fast. In those days, there were no mine safety laws and no trade unions. Miners had to look out for themselves.

America has come a long way since those days. But it has been a battle—a 100-year battle for social and economic justice. That battle has been difficult. But it has produced a record of remarkable achievement, achievements which have steadily improved the lives of all of us.

An American born at the turn of the twentieth century could expect to live 47 years; today life expectancy is three decades longer.

Working men and women—through their unions, and through their churches—took on the most privileged of society and won victory after victory; for health care, for pensions, and for workplace safety.

They pushed Congress and state legislatures to pass legislation on Medicare and Social Security, civil rights and rights for the disabled, food safety and public health, worker safety and minimum wage, clean air and safe drinking water.

It was mostly Democrats that made those advances, but it was Republicans sometimes too. Abraham Lincoln—Republican—ended slavery. Theodore Roosevelt—Republican—gave us the national park system.

And a couple of dozen Republicans courageously stood with Democrats to pass civil rights and Medicare, to create the EPA and worker safety rules.

But that progress has stopped. Because we have very different Republicans today in Columbus and Washington.

Instead of public servants we have monied interests—in Columbus and in Washington—who see government simply as a profit center, a chance to reward their friends, punish their enemies, and shower money on themselves.

More than at any time in our history, the people who run our state, the people who run our country, have abused power and used it for their self-interest, used it for their private gain.

You know the sins. Greed. Bribery. Threats.

You know the names. Bob Taft. Tom Noe. Tom DeLay. Dick Cheney.

And you know what they are doing to our country.

Too many of my days begin and end with stories of Americans who feel betrayed by their government. Workers are losing their pensions, families are losing their healthcare, young people are losing hope. Parents who want to give their children a better life through education are seeing their dreams shattered.

Since 2000, 5 million Americans have lost their health insurance.

Ohio has lost more than 200,000 manufacturing jobs in the last five years.

Wages are stagnant, workers are working harder, and bankruptcies are at all-time highs.

How could this have happened in America?

How could this have happened in our great state of Ohio?

One-party government and its twin—greedy self-interest—have betrayed our people and abandoned our values.

Our political leaders refuse to find solutions to high gasoline prices, they reject any plan to reduce the outrageous cost of prescription drugs, and they show no interest in combating the shockingly high home heating bills which will soon hit us.

Their contributors—the oil companies, the drug companies—have paralyzed them.

Bush, Taft and DeWine, the Republican Leadership Team, have stood silently by while our state has lost 200,000 manufacturing jobs, while our communities are losing fire protection, police protection, and a traditional way of life. Their contributors have paralyzed them.

They have turned their backs on our families. Our young people are leaving our state in record numbers because we are not offering opportunities that make them want to stay. The Bush-Taft-DeWine team has failed our schools, from kindergarten to our great state universities.

We read about corruption—about a government that is unrecognizable to every government teacher in our great state, a cronyism that we believed ended with Tammany Hall, cast aside into the dustbin of history.

The pharmaceutical companies wrote the Medicare law. The chemical companies write environmental rules. The oil companies wrote the energy bill. Wall Street writes Social Security privatization legislation. Bankers and outsourcers wrote the Central American Free Trade Agreement.

Sometimes—in politics and in life—we have to choose sides. We have to draw a clear line between what’s right and what’s wrong. Between what works for the people of our great nation and what works for only the privileged few.

Most of us here chose sides years ago. We chose sides based on our faith—a faith in God, and a faith in our country to live up to the promise of America. Our faith demands that we work tirelessly for social and economic justice.

I learned about faith and social and economic justice not far from here, from my parents and my church.

My faith teaches me that The Beatitudes is not just the greatest sermon ever given, it may be the best political speech ever delivered. It teaches us about caring for the least among us, about being a shepherd for the less privileged, about fighting for social and economic justice.

My faith informs me which side to take.

In 1993, I chose the side of families and communities and workers against the outsourcing of jobs to Mexico. As a freshman Congressman, I helped form a bi-partisan coalition and stood up to the president of the United States, a president in my party, and fought against the North American Free Trade Agreement.

As your United States senator, I will fight even harder for fair trade.

Three years ago, I chose the side of our men and women in uniform when I demanded of Secretary Rumsfeld and Administrator Bremer that their first priority should be the safety of our troops in Iraq. That no soldier, no Marine should go into battle—EVER—without body armor.

As your United States senator, I will fight even harder for our troops and our veterans.

Two years ago, again into the wee hours of the night, I chose the side of America’s senior citizens, helped form a bi-partisan coalition, and stood up to the drug companies which charge Americans three or four times what Canadians pay for their medicine.

As your United States senator, I will fight even harder for affordable health care.

When you choose sides, you take the heat. The mark of true leadership is the ability and the willingness to stand up to pressure, to refuse to back down.

When I voted and spoke out against sending our young men and women to Iraq, I took the heat, I stood my ground. And many of you joined me.

Night after night, in the tradition of John Quincy Adams, I stayed after session and read aloud on the House floor dozens of letters from Ohio mothers and fathers, husbands and wives of soldiers and Marines in Iraq, dozens of letters from Ohioans who questioned the wisdom of this war.

Now I want to be their voice in the United States Senate.

And because I chose sides years ago, I will make a prediction: America’s largest drug companies will pour a million, two million, maybe three million dollars into our state to try to defeat me.

And, because I have fought for lower energy prices, this country’s largest oil companies will pour in another million dollars or two million dollars to try to defeat me.

Out-of-state insurance HMOs. Out-of-state pharmaceutical firms. Out-of-state tobacco companies. Out of state oil interests.

Well, here's what I have to say to all these out-of-state interests: Get out of our state. You've done enough damage.

Let me say something about Mike DeWine who has been our senator for 11 years. He is a decent man. Senator DeWine has tried to create an image of supposed independence from the hard edges of the Republican Party, the self-interest and greed of the 21st century Republican Party—telling us that he is no George Bush, that he is different from Bob Taft.

But too often, when called upon by George Bush, Mike DeWine has done his partisan duty. When George Bush said, Let’s make war on Iraq, Mike DeWine said, I’m right behind you, Mr President.

When George Bush said, Let’s privatize Social Security, Mike DeWine said, I’m with you, Mr. President; in fact, I already have a bill to help you do it.

When George Bush said, We need a trade bill with Central America so American business can outsource more Ohio jobs, Mike DeWine was one of its chief cheerleaders.

Mike DeWine has chosen sides. And, on issues that matter to Ohioans, Mike DeWine is on the wrong side.

Just two weeks ago, Congress passed a budget—of course in the middle of the night, of course with the roll held open for far too long, of course with Republican members changing their votes under the cover of darkness.

A budget is a moral document. A government budget, just like a family budget, reflects its values. This budget had it all wrong.

Cuts in Medicaid which will hurt our elderly living in nursing homes and hurt small children whose parents have full-time jobs. Cuts in student loans which will hurt our middle class families who are struggling to reach their dreams for their kids. Cuts in food stamps which will hurt the poorest families in our country. . . . All to pay for tax cuts for the wealthiest one percent of people in our nation.

That is the 21st century Republican version of family values. Those are not our family values.

Republicans have sold us on their counterfeit values and phony priorities for way too long.

Tax cuts for their largest contributors masking as economic policy; an Iraq debacle pretending to be a war on terror; saddling our children and grandchildren with a huge debt in the name of fiscal responsibility; a quarter trillion dollar payout to the drug and insurance industries under the guise of a medical benefit for our senior citizens.

Washington Republicans have made their choices. Now it’s our turn to make ours.

My values tell me that our government and our country owe you more than that.

Republicans in Ohio and Republicans in Washington have proved over and over again that they deserve to lose. But that's not enough.

We as Democrats must prove we're ready to lead. Democrats have to be bold. We have to tell voters about our plan to change the direction of our country—a higher minimum wage and help for small business, a plan to bring down prescription drug prices for their parents and college tuition for their children, a chance for their families to reach their dreams.

That’s why, in the great tradition of Howard Metzenbaum and John Glenn, I am running for the United States Senate.

My campaign for the United States Senate is about providing opportunity for Ohio—for all of Ohio:

I will represent the people of Ohio—not the pharmaceutical companies, not the oil interests, not the insurance companies.

I will represent Republicans, Democrats, and Independents—not do the bidding of the guy in the White House, whatever his party affiliation.

I will continue to wage the fight—now in a larger arena, in the United States Senate—for fair trade to protect American workers on Main Street, not sell out American workers to Wall Street.

I will continue to wage the fight—now in a larger arena, in the United States Senate—for a health care system which is affordable and accessible to everyone. . . Whether they work in a minimum wage job or serve as a corporate vice president.

Today, I announce my candidacy for the United States Senate. Join me, and together we will change the direction of our great country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AlecBGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-05 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. Holy Moses!
:wow: I was all for Hackett but now...? Brown is a true blue progressive from the sound of it. You go boy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-05-05 08:36 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Sherrod's been a progressive
when being a progressive wasn't cool.

He's never been one to change his views according to opinion polls or recommendations from consultants. He's a sensible progressive, someone who manages to balance the rights of people with the need to have jobs and a healthy business environment.

He's also completely and utterly fearless. He's not afraid to back down when defending what's right.

Best of all, he's a warm, friendly, funny charming guy who is liked even by those who disagree with him.

I've known him for several years, he's been my Congressman for 5 years and I've never had a moment's concern about how he's going to vote on legislation.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cmd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-05-05 07:30 AM
Response to Original message
2. Why I support Sherrod Brown
I'm a great admirer of the grit of Paul Hackett. If he wins in the primary I will work tirelessly to see that he is elected. However, I will be supporting Sherrod Brown in the primary. He is a tested and proven progressive. Please take the time to read his entire speech and you will see why he is admired by all of us who know him. A recommendation for the front page is also appreciated. cmd
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-05-05 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
3. Why I am proud to call Sherrod my friend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MeDeMax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-05-05 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
5. this paragraph really rings true
(under the bush administration)

"The pharmaceutical companies wrote the Medicare law.
The chemical companies write environmental rules.
The oil companies wrote the energy bill.
Wall Street writes Social Security privatization legislation.
Bankers and outsourcers wrote the Central American
Free Trade Agreement."


Sherrod also spoke about what he will be up against, he is certain the above entities will each pour a few million to run ads against him, since he did not support bills favoring them in congress.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-05-05 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Predicted to be the most expensive Ohio race, ever, up to $15 Million
Edited on Mon Dec-05-05 11:25 AM by TheBorealAvenger
According to the Brown campaign, as reported by Ohio Public Radio.
edit: contribute to Brown at Grow Ohio: http://growohio.org/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-05-05 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. And the defense companies write our foreign policy.
He forgot that one....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cmd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-05-05 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
6. Kicking
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-05-05 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
8. Can't Ohio have both of them?
What an embarrassment of riches you have in the Ohio Democratic party. Lucky devils.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-05-05 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Usually we are hurting for candidates.
Mr. Hackett could run against whomever the gops put up on OH-2, then we keep them both !:think:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femrap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-05-05 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. I don't see why Hackett doesn't run in the 2nd....
he could beat Mean Jean or whomever wins the primary.

What a waste of money on a demcratic primary! What is Hackett thinking? Sherrod is a true Progressive Democrat.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-12-05 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #13
26. Hackett's "thinking" that Sherrod said he wasn't running.
It was AFTER Hackett's announcement that Brown changed his mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-12-05 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #10
25. Alternately,
Sherrod could just keep his old seat and stay out of this race (like he said he was going to).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
centristo Donating Member (500 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-05-05 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
9. excellent speech
I guess having two great Democratic candidates is one of those "good" problems to have...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-05-05 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
12. "Pigs never look up when they're eating." S. Brown
It was one of the most memorable lines I every heard a politician say, with reference to the corruption of some Republicans when he was state auditor, IIRC. It was just a passing comment that the local (Rethug) news anchors were probably shocked to put on Columbus TV. I've been a fan of his ever since.

DUers, we have to find a place for both Hackett and Brown.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MeDeMax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. great point, we can't let either
candidate go to waste (idle). They hold too much promise at a time we need it most.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
15. while I think Brown is a good man, I think Hackett has a better chance of
winning by drawing on his military experience. there is a big anti career politician sentiment around which I believe will help Hackett even more. I think Sherrod Brown should run in 2 year against Voinovich and let Hackett have this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. I hear a lot about this outsider-military persona thing that Hackett has
I would surely like to see someone develop the idea. It certainly is not apparent to me and the only promotion I have seen is something about his Marine uniform and that he utters profanities. (yeah, that'll get a lot of moms voting for him). I think his fund raising prowess is overrated. He was the only race going when Dr. Dean sent a message out to the party faithful--that's how he bagged a slick $300,000 in a week.

Further, about this anti-career politician sentiment, you have no better outsider challenger than Sherrod Brown who has stood bravely against the war and bravely against the Clintons and Begala/Carvilles who shoved NAFTA/CAFTA/FTAA on the Democrats. Once Mr. Brown starts getting those messages out, he is going to find a whole bunch of sympathetic voters in Ohio. (Can you find anybody mad about losing 200,000 manufacturing jobs?) Brown is as faithful to Democratic principles as any candidate. DU has always been a site with no quarter for poseurs and DINOs. Let's go with the man who is carrying our message, and let's not cower in some fear that we are not sounding enough like republicans to appeal to some poorly-defined center of the electorate.

Further further, Voinovich is not up for election for five years. I expect the old buzzard will quit and return to his nest feathered with prison dollars--but that is an aside. Maybe Paul Hackett should park it for an election cycle and go learn something about policy and politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Hackett drew a huge percentage of the votes (many would argue he won) in
Edited on Tue Dec-06-05 09:56 AM by mod mom
district 02, a Republican stronghold. If it was for the "delay due to high humidity" we might have Hackett instead of the embarassing Schmidt. Also he is a southern, coming from the Cincinnati area, which usually goes Republican as well. Hackett could draw extra votes from the South part of Ohio. Brown is seen as a Northern liberal, so would be less likely to peel away Repub moderates.

I also stated that there is an anti career politican sentiment which was recently demonstrated in a poll which (regardless of the multiple Republican Ohio Scandals-Taft, Noe and Ney to name a few) that indicated that 38% of Ohioans felt Democrats could clean up government, while 37% felt Republicans could do it. One would think the Dems would be the clear choice, yet the numbers are close.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. You explained the "anti career politican sentiment" well
thank you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femrap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-07-05 01:15 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. I lost respect for Hackett when he didn't demand a
recount...he had a perfectly good reason...'the humidity problem.' But he decided to go on vacation instead. The only one to demand a recount is the candidate. The voters could do nothing.

I listened to his crap about how women can't carry 80 lbs. on their back and kick in doors in Fallujah.....and I wondered at the time, 'How the hell does that make you qualified to be a representative from Ohio?'

I went to hear him speak again....and this time he told me I was a fool about guns....he gave me a list of the animals he liked to kill. If I wanted Dems to be elected, I had to be pro-gun. I thought it would be nice if these gun toting folks would bounty hunt instead of deer hunt....I mean that is a real challenge. Go after the murderers, rapists, abusers....now that's 'hard work.'

Well, guess what! I took Hackett's and Walt Star's advice....I am now certified to carry concealed in Ohio. I wonder what the Pugs will think of that?!!!!! Progressives with guns! What a hoot!

LOL....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jen4clark Donating Member (812 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-07-05 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. I'm with you on this one
mod mom. I saw Hackett speak the other night at the VFW in Kent and it cemented my support for him without a doubt. He is liberal and proud of it but being born and raised in the reddest of the red part of OH (Cincinnati area) he knows that to win the seat we're going to need cross over votes. That doesn't mean he's going to lean right - he's very adamant about his stand on the issues, especially separation of church and state and privacy rights.

I wrote a report on his talk HERE if anyone's interested in reading about it.

Another woman from the Portage County Dems wrote about it and posted photos at kos HERE.

It goes without saying if Brown wins the primary I will do everything I can to put him in the Senate!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Algorem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-07-05 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
20. Q&A with Sherrod Brown
http://toledoblade.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20051204/NEWS09/512040377

Article published Sunday, December 4, 2005

Q&A with Sherrod Brown


Question: Let's start simply. Why are you running?

Answer: I look around at what's happened to our state, and the last 10 years of failed leadership from Bob Taft, George Bush, Mike DeWine. Too many Ohioans are losing their pensions. Too many Ohioans can't afford to send their kids to college. Too many Ohioans are suffering from high prescription-drug and home-heating costs. This state and this country need a new direction.


Q: Is it fair to group Mike DeWine with Bob Taft and George Bush?

A: When George Bush said I want to attack Iraq, Mike DeWine said I'm with you, Mr. President. When George Bush wants to privatize social security, Mike DeWine says I've already got a bill to do it, Mr. President. When George Bush wanted the Medicare bill, Mike DeWine was with him. When George Bush pushed his energy - his giveaway to the oil companies' energy bill - through Congress, Mike DeWine was right there … On every major issue, Bob Taft and Mike DeWine and George Bush have worked together, absolutely....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Algorem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
22. Dick Clifton column on columnist/wife-Senate candidate situation
Edited on Fri Dec-09-05 02:01 PM by Algorem
Happy couple raise issues in newsroom

http://www.cleveland.com/news/plaindealer/doug_clifton/index.ssf?/base/opinion/113403472050230.xml&coll=2

Thursday, December 08, 2005
Doug Clifton
Plain Dealer Columnist

Anyone who has lived in Northeast Ohio for even a short time knows who Sherrod Brown is.

And anyone who reads The Plain Dealer is familiar with Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist Connie Schultz.

Not everyone knows the two are married.

As a rule, it matters very little whom a politician or a journalist chooses as a spouse...


(oh sorry I got his name wrong,I should fix it)

Schultz Hears Strong Reaction to Editor's Column

http://www.mediainfo.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1001657509

Chris Stephens/The Plain Dealer
Connie Schultz

By Dave Astor

Published: December 08, 2005 5:17 PM ET

NEW YORK Reaction has been swift to Editor Dick Clifton's column in The Plain Dealer explaining how the marriage between star columnist Connie Schultz and U.S. Senatorial candidate Sherrod Brown will impact the paper's coverage.

"I listened to about 200 calls," Schultz told E&P Thursday afternoon, just hours after Clifton's column hit Cleveland's newsstands and bounced around the Internet. "Most of them were from women supporting me. They were angry at the idea that I was supposedly parroting my husband's viewpoints."

Clifton's column looked to head off any possible conflict-of-interest perceptions relating to Schultz being married to Brown, who's currently a U.S. representative in Ohio.

Schultz, winner of the 2005 Pulitzer Prize for commentary, emphasized that Clifton knows her column isn't influenced by her husband. But Schultz said some people think that, and she finds it "offensive." The Plain Dealer writer added that a male columnist with a politician wife would probably not be subject to the same insinuation...


'Plain Dealer' Editor Discusses Political Marriage

http://www.mediainfo.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1001657260

By E&P Staff

Published: December 08, 2005 11:11 AM ET

NEW YORK Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist Connie Schultz's marriage to U.S. Senate candidate Sherrod Brown was the subject of a Thursday column by Dick Clifton, editor of The Plain Dealer of Cleveland.

"If there comes a time when Connie feels her obligations as the wife of a candidate require a more visible presence on the campaign, she will take a leave of absence," wrote Clifton. "Meanwhile, look for Connie in her twice-weekly column, not campaigning for Sherrod Brown. And understand that Connie's relationship with candidate Brown will have no influence -- for or against -- our coverage of his campaign."

Brown, a Democrat, is currently a U.S. Congressman from Ohio. Schultz, who could not be immediately reached for comment by E&P, is The Plain Dealer columnist who won her Pulitzer this April. She's syndicated by Newhouse News Service.

Clifton also wrote: "Connie writes an opinion column for our feature section. Though she doesn't write about politics, per se, she does write regularly about social-justice issues. By any definition, she's a liberal. Her husband is one of the House's most liberal Democrats and fights for the same kinds of issues Connie frequently takes on in her column...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Algorem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-10-05 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
23. Right-Wing Spin In the House Democratic Caucus
December 10, 2005

http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_david_si_051210_right_wing_spin_in_t.htm

Right-Wing Spin In the House Democratic Caucus
by David Sirota

http://www.opednews.com

Never underestimate the willingness of some Democrats to regurgitate right-wing lies and undercut their own party's message. Even in the seemingly smallest settings, we see it all the time. Take the current race for Vice-Chair of the House Democratic Caucus. This is basically a powerless, but symbolic position, yet even in this venue, some Democrats are self-servingly spewing out GOP talking points, just to get themselves ahead.

Take one of the candidates, Rep. Joe Crowley (D-NY), who is running against Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-IL). For some personal history, I like Crowley personally (he's a nice guy), and I actually worked against Schakowsky in a Democratic primary in her first run for Congress. But the contrast today on the issues couldn't be more clear between the two of these Members of Congress. Schakowsky has consistently fought for the progressive agenda, while Crowley (who was once a promising Member of Congress) has become a really tragic example of a politician who has gone Washington in the worst sense.

According to the Associated Press (story linked below), "Crowley suggested in an interview that Schakowsky may be too liberal to do the party any good where it really counts." Incredible. Here is a guy who represents a working-class district in New York City actually berating a good progressive for being progressive, and then saying - without a shred of proof - that being a good progressive doesn't "help" the party. Perhaps more disturbing is the unsaid commentary of it all: namely, Crowley's assumption that by doing that, he might actually get himself votes from fellow Democrats in Congress. The fact that that assumption even exists among any elected Democratic official tells us what kind of sad, pathetic struggle is really going on among Democrats in Congress...

On the other side are Democrats like Sen. Russ Feingold, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D), Rep. Sherrod Brown (OH), and Schakowsky, people who have stood up for the progressive populist causes on the war and on economic issues...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Algorem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-11-05 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
24. Brown's about-to-be press sec. an Al Franken producer,Liars researcher
http://www.madison.com/wsj/home/column/index.php?ntid=64721&ntpid=1

From yellow to golden

Here's a note to all the West High School teachers and administrators who yanked their hair out over the underground newspaper The Yellow Press, which made waves and satired high school life in the late '90s: Your former students that caused you headaches have done you proud.

Yellow Press co-founder Ben Wikler has been working as a producer on left-wing comedian Al Franken 's radio show for almost two years. He met Franken while Wikler was a student at Harvard and he became a research assistant for Franken's book, "Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them: A Fair and Balanced Look at the Right."

Wikler's now leaving to become press secretary to Ohio Rep. Sherrod Brown (D- Ohio), who is running for the Senate.

"I'm happiest when I'm doing something I really believe in," says Wikler. "He's the real deal and I wanted to do whatever I could to help him out."...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Ohio Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC