Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Democrat Esch declares intention to unseat Terry

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Places » Nebraska Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-05 09:04 AM
Original message
Democrat Esch declares intention to unseat Terry
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
TheFarseer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-05 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. Does he have a chance? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
craychek Donating Member (173 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 01:47 AM
Response to Original message
2. I don't know
he could pull it off if he rode this hurricane katrina thing...

Maybe...
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. I don't see any reason to vote for this guy. He's just a republican in
democratic clothing. We've got enough of the already. And as much as I detest Lee Terry Jr., this is not much of an improvement. We still have to do better.

<snip>

Esch said he initially opposed the war in Iraq, but would not support the immediate withdrawal of troops. He said he does not think that America's military should leave until that country is stabilized.

"I don't think we should have gone in there in the first place, but we can't leave it worse than when we found it," Esch said.
<snip>

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
TheFarseer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I think we make a mistake judging candidates by that
just like republicans make a mistake judging candidates based on who is most anti-abortion. I don't know a thing about Esch. I hope the MSM will allow us to learn about him if he is indeed our candidate. There are a whole array of issues we should be concerned about and besides, not even everyone on here wants immediate withdrawl.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. And by 'not everybody here' do you mean yourself? Do you suggest
that we have the resources (troops and money) to keep this farce up? Do you think that by hanging in there the Iraqis will eventually accept the occupation?

By the very same token I think that I've seen more calls here for immediate withdrawal than I've seen for the continuation of a losing situation. Eventually all good and BAD things have to come to an end. And if the situation is lose/lose, the intelligent thing to do is get the hell out sooner rather than later.

I think we need a progressive dem to run for office. By that I mean someone 180 degrees from Ben Nelson. We don't need another DINO to run for office in Nebraska. The little bit I've seen about this guy suggests that's all he is. Maybe I'm wrong, but I doubt it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Dave Sund Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Okay....
Then find yourself a liberal in the state. I think there's maybe a couple dozen of us, and we're all broke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
the observationist Donating Member (130 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #6
18. LOL AMEN DAVE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
TheFarseer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I can see merit to both positions
Haven't you seen the polls on DU where "gradual withdrawal" gets almost as many votes as "immediate withdrawal"? I don't know why we can't get those Iraqi troops trained faster. I think that is the real answer to get us out of there - let our puppet government do the heavy lifting. Bribe the holy shit out of them to join up if need be. I think we both know we are there til at least 2008 to steal as much oil as possible no maater who we elect to our 2nd district.

I'm pretty disgusted by Ben Nelson too. Dems don't like him because of - well, isn't it obvious? and repubs don't like him because of the low level nuclear waste site disaster. He would have a bitch of a time getting re-elected if the repubs ran someone sane. They have the best of both worlds right now, someone that votes their way 90% of the time and a someone they can throw rocks at all in the same guy. I'm not sure I will bother voting for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Ben Nelson has been a disaster to both the democratic party in this
state and to Nebraska in general. I can't even think of one time where he even seemed to be in full control of all his faculties. He seems to forget completely what party he is supposed to represent, and his reasons for any vote (when someone calls him on it) are so lame he might as well just come out and say 'it's because I only ran as a dem so I could screw this state up more than it already is'.

As for voting for him, I have but grudgingly up to this point. But not again. I'll write my dog's name in. It'll do just as much good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Nebraska_Liberal Donating Member (145 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-02-05 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Sounds like another Nelson...
http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/11/02/alito.ap/index.html

Is this what we really want? This guy is young and would potentially stay there for years to come...
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
sfg94 Donating Member (6 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-05-05 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Why not?
At this point in the game, I'd be thrilled with any democrat to hold elected office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #9
19. Will he support the leadership, i.e, Pelosi as Speaker?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
the observationist Donating Member (130 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-05-05 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Re: Nelson
I haven't done a lot of research on Nelson other than hearing he votes for Repug's 40% of the time. In a sense it seems like he's a moderate. Why the disgust?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Nebraska_Liberal Donating Member (145 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Nelson
Im not happy with Nelson because he is a social conservative. Im not much for pro-war, anti-choice, so called Democrats...
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Nebraska_Liberal Donating Member (145 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Nelson...
He also screws Nebraskans out of needed social programs...
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
spoko Donating Member (8 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-05 07:33 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. Take an actual look
Well, no offense, but maybe you should do some research. When you do, you'll see that Ben Nelson stands out over and over again as the only "Democrat" voting with Republicans when everyone else voted along party lines. Now, I'm not one who supports voting along party lines. But typically, with this congress, what a party-line vote means is that the Republican leadership is trying to put through some really obnoxious legislation--something that even their own party wouldn't vote for. So they pressure their own people to pass it, whereas all the Democrats--even the moderates--are left alone to vote against it, as any sane person would. But you always have old Benny-boy in there trying to get the Republicans to like him. He's a horrible Democrat, and a horrible congressman. I'm absolutely ashamed that he comes from this state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
spoko Donating Member (8 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-05 07:54 AM
Response to Reply #5
15. What do you suggest, really?
I'm another one who doesn't support immediate withdrawal. The reason is that I have yet to see anyone propose an actual PLAN that involves immediate withdrawal. I don't think anyone who's taken even a passing look at the situation on the ground thinks that it would improve if we instantly had no presence there. Bush's policies have created a gigantic mess, and if we don't help at least a little bit to start cleaning it up, it's going to get much much worse.

There's nothing progressive about just diametrically opposing anything a Republican might support, as a knee-jerk reaction. So let's be reasonable. Let's do something to get the place stabilized, quickly and efficiently, and then let's get out and let them do their own thing. There are reasonable, progressive plans to do this--take a look at The Center for American Progress' proposal, for example. (They call for complete withdrawal by the end of 2007.) Of course, you're welcome to claim that they're not real progressives because they aren't "180 degrees from" the Republicans, but I think you'd lose quite a bit of credibility in doing so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Nebraska_Liberal Donating Member (145 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-05 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. I get there email on a daily basis.
You don't have to be 180 degrees from the Repulicans, you just can't try and out Republican them and expect to win elections...
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ChipperbackDemocrat Donating Member (331 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. problem is Liberal.
Who can you get in Nebraska who can stand up on the left and make a run at it?

I can only think of four people in the state who could be a real Democratic alternative and the state party wouldn't go for it, and many Nebraskans wouldn't either.

You have to be moderate to win as a Democrat is this state, but I agree that you don't have to roll over on every issue as Nelson is prone to do.

I'm not too worried about Ben Nelson. He's too good politician to get beaten by a lot of people who are talking about going against him.

I'm more concerned about who will be the Governor's mansion after 2006.

Where is Virginia Walsh when you need her?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
TheFarseer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-12-05 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Don't worry about the governor's race
You might as well worry that someday it might rain. Of course Tom is going to win and he won't be that bad. I think he at least cares about this state which is more than I can say for most of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Nebraska Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC