Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Chicago Trade With Justice Working Group

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Places » Illinois Donate to DU
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 01:38 AM
Original message
Chicago Trade With Justice Working Group
Some very creative actions coming from a new group in Chicago!

This past Saturday December 15th, members of the recently formed 'Chicago Trade with Justice Working Group' paid a visit to the Obama for America headquarters in Chicago. They wanted to tell Senator Barack Obama that they are concerned with his failure to appear at the recent Senate vote on the US-Peru "Free Trade" Agreement. They left a statement for Obama expressing their disappointment that he skipped the vote on the Peru trade pact. They were even more concerned that Obama, along with Sen Hillary Clinton, made public statements supporting the Peru Trade deal and that Illinois Senator from Illinois, Dick Durbin, voted in favor of it.

To see a video of the action, go to:
Hi Res: http://blip.tv/file/544160/
or YouTube:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cBw3IVwd58w

This is the letter they left with Obama's staffer:

Chicago Trade With Justice Working Group

Senator Barack Obama
December 15, 2007
Obama For America
300 West Adams Street
Chicago, IL 60603

Dear Senator Obama,

As activists from labor, religious, environmental, immigrant rights, Latin American solidarity and peace movements, we are concerned about our U.S. Congressional and Senate leaders' support of unfair trade agreements.

You, along with other presidential hopefuls, failed to show up when the United States-Peru Trade Promotion Agreement (H.R. 3688,S. 2113) came up for a vote. In fact, a surprising number of Democrats voted in favor of what is essentially a neoliberal trade agreement with far-reaching negative implications for the environment and the lives of working people both in Peru and in the U.S. You (as well as Senator Clinton) have stated publicly that you support passage of the agreement. You, i essence, echoed House Speaker Nancy Pelosi when she stated, "I don't want this party to be viewed as an anti-trade party." This seems at odds with what you have stated previously. You have frequently criticized NAFTA and CAFTA for costing jobs and reducing the quality of life for American workers. Yet when given the chance to prevent the expansion of NAFTA to another country you did not act.

Democratic leaders have said that the added provisions in the agreement require Peru to adopt protections for workers and the environment and set a new standard for trade deals. The Bush administration agreed to these changes in order to win Democratic support. But there are no mechanisms set forth in the agreement that guarantee that these provisions will be adhered to by either the Peruvian government or the U.S. In fact, they weaken the existing and already un-enforced labor statutes in both countries.

In October, the International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC) stated in a report that "many aspects of the current Peruvian labor legislation contravene ILO standards" and called urgently for an overhaul of labor law in Peru. Can we really trust that such a government will respect the rights of its workers in the future without serious pressure to do so?

Rather than empower working people and average citizens, the agreement provides the mechanisms for greater power to multinational corporations. One such mechanism, referred to as investor-to-state rights, allows corporations to seek reparations for anything that gets in the way of their profits, including workers seeking better wages and working conditions or environmentalists seeking to save natural habitats or governments seeking pollution abatement. This mechanism is a real threat to democracy as we have already seen in the case of NAFTA.

Also of concern is the fact that the U.S.-Peru Trade Agreement threatens to undermine the livelihood of subsistence farmers in Peru, in much the same way NAFTA impoverished small farmers in Mexico. Over a million peasants were forced off their land in Mexico because NAFTA favored the importation of cheap agricultural goods from U.S.-based multinational agribusiness which receive major government subsidies in the United States. The U.S.-Peru Trade Agreement continues this failed policy of eliminating government support for small farmers in developing economies while leaving subsidies to major agricultural corporations in place.

The result will be much the same as in Mexico for Peru's peasant families - deeper poverty and increased migration.

The privatization agenda behind past trade agreements is also in evidence in the U.S.-Peru Trade Agreement. This is one of the causes of greatest concern for the general public in Peru and one of the reasons for the massive protests in that country against the agreement. The agreement will encourage privatization of Peru's vital systems for providing health care, water, and education. Average Peruvians will not be able to afford generic medicines because of new patents and data-protection regulations imposed by the agreement, which sacrifice the health of working class and poor Peruvians in the interests of greater profits for pharmaceutical corporations.

The very structure of this and other trade agreements, e.g. The United States-Colombia Trade Promotion Agreement currently being lobbied by the CEOs of multinationals, is styled after NAFTA and FTAA. They each oblige competition over who can provide the cheapest labor, therefore requiring the exploitation of cheap labor in foreign markets and the exporting of U.S. jobs. No amount of provisional "reform" can restructure an uneven foundation that slants in favor of government-subsidized multinational corporations.

Congress has failed American workers with Senate passage of the US-Peru Free Trade Agreement. We call on you, Senator Obama, to explain your support of the Peru Free Trade Agreement in light of the weak labor and environmental provisions.

We further ask you to take a leadership role in standing against future trade agreements that do nothing more than exploit the labor and resources of all countries involved. The flawed NAFTA model is devastating workers in all participating countries, and the American people are demanding that we reject that model. We urge you to find the courage to do so.

Sincerely,

for the Chicago Trade With Justice Working Group:

Guillermo Campuzano
Daniel Delapava
Elizabeth Deligio
Ruth Goring
Paul Horst
Elizabeth Lozano
Greg McCain
Jerry Mead-Lucero
Tim Nafziger
Charity Ryerson
Gilberto Villaseñor
Danielle Wegman

CONTACTS:
Greg McCain
773-398-7808
greg_mccain {at} yahoo.com

Jerry Mead-Lucero
312) 502-7867
redjerry2 {at} yahoo.com

Chicago Trade With Justice Working Group
_________________________________________
Trade-Matters mailing list
Trade-Matters {at} list.afsc.org
http://list.afsc.org/mailman/listinfo/trade-matters

Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Illinois Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC