Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Judge tosses 'Buy Nothing' charges

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Places » Delaware Donate to DU
 
cyberpj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 08:59 AM
Original message
Judge tosses 'Buy Nothing' charges
Nice to see free speech is still allowed in Delaware.......

Judge tosses 'Buy Nothing' charges
By SEAN O'SULLIVAN / The News Journal
04/05/2005

Anna, Laura and Rachel White, along with a friend, Terri Carter, were arrested by state police on Black Friday, the day after Thanksgiving, at Christiana Mall, for promoting an anticonsumerism event called Buy Nothing Day. The women were wearing Santa hats and white T-shirts with the words "NOTHING - What you have been looking for" and "Ask me about NOTHING" on them. Carter also had a video camera.

After a mall security guard told the group to leave, they did, they said, but they were surrounded by four or five state troopers when they got to their car. The four were arrested and charged with third-degree trespassing, a violation which is less than a misdemeanor. If found guilty, they could have faced probation and fines of up to $345 for a first offense.

Attorney Sid Balick was representing the group at the request of the American Civil Liberties Union.....

(snip)

"People should not be arrested for exercising their right to speak in a public place," said Drewry Fennell, executive director of the Delaware ACLU.

http://www.delawareonline.com/newsjournal/local/2005/04/05judgetossesbuyn.html

Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
SouthernDem2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. Hmmm, did the author read their own article before titling it?
Makes you wonder. The charges were dropped because of the change of court date confusion. It had nothing to do with free speech but with Trespassing. On the other hand, if the statement that they were told to leave and were in the process of leaving is true then the Trespassing charge would not be valid. Of course we only get one side of the story. Who knows...
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Delaware Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC