Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Suppose there is an Electoral College tie.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Blue-Jay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-04 04:28 PM
Original message
Suppose there is an Electoral College tie.
I realize that the election is then decided by the House, but has this ever happened before? Is there a precident?

Also, what do you think the chances are that the HoR vote would favor the popular vote, or would they just <sigh> vote down party lines?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
alc Donating Member (649 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-04 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. John Qincy Adams 1824
The house decided in 1824 because of electoral college tie.. Hasn't happened since or before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Massacure Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-04 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. 1800 - Jefferson vs Burr
Edited on Wed Sep-29-04 04:35 PM by Massacure
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alc Donating Member (649 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-04 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. I was wrong
Edited on Wed Sep-29-04 04:40 PM by alc
It did happen in 1800 too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-04 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Hi alc!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wuushew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-04 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. The election of 1824 was problematic
Andrew Jackson despite winning a plurality of popular votes and electoral votes still lost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MasterD Donating Member (9 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-04 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yes.
This has happened two times: In 1800, Thomas Jefferson and Aaron Burr tied (Jefferson won), and in 1824 when the House chose John Quincy Adams over Andrew Jackson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mconvente Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-04 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Aha - The Corrupt Bargain of 1824
Jackson won the popular vote (but still had less than 50% because four people ran) and also won the electoral vote, but ended up losing because Henry Clay (who was Secretary of State or Interior or something like that) went behind the curtains and got Adams in as president. Of course, this mirrors the 2000 selection of Bush as president. Ah, but here's where it gets sweet! Jackson ran again in 1828 against Adams and got uber-revenge - he won fair and square! Looking for Kerry to do the same thing!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-04 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #4
13. Hi MasterD!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
louis c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-04 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
5. Bush would win
The house votes in state caucases.

New York would get one vote, and Utah would get one vote.

Each would be assigned by the majority in that state delegation.

Small states have advantage, so we get f**ked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wuushew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-04 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. what happens in the event of a non-majority?
say a state had 4 dems and 4 pukes in congress, would the vote mirror the states popular vote?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
louis c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-04 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I don't know
It would only matter if a candidate couldn't get to 26 states.

Imagine this scenario. Kerry carries the popular vote, the Dems hold a narrow majority in congress, the Electoral College ends up tied, but Bush retains the already tainted presidency by this method of one state one vote.

Wow, talk about closing in on a revolution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-04 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
8. Then Bush wins
When the election is thrown to the House each state gets one vote, and a majority of state delegations must vote for one candidate for there to be a winner. If every Representative votes their party, Bush wins because 31 states are majority Republican Representatives, 16 are majority Democratic Representatives and 3 state delegations are split. Bush even has some wiggle room for defections here.

Bush needs 269 and Kerry needs 270. It's that simple.

P.S. Yes, the last time a tie took place was in 1800. It took the House 17 ballots to pick Jefferson over Aaron Burr.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
camaro69 Donating Member (69 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-04 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
11. No tie
It will be a land slide.........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC