|
|
|
| Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
|
Hutzpa
|
Sat Nov-07-09 08:11 PM Original message |
| Stupak's Bill is a discriminating bill and a racist bill |
| Refresh | +3 Recommendations | Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
| |
Why is his bill racist? |
Oregone | Nov-07-09 08:13 PM | #1 |
Because it supresses one faction of |
Hutzpa | Nov-07-09 08:16 PM | #2 |
What faction? How? |
Oregone | Nov-07-09 08:18 PM | #3 |
Well |
Hutzpa | Nov-07-09 08:22 PM | #4 |
ethnic minorities need more abortions? |
Oregone | Nov-07-09 08:24 PM | #5 |
Have you read the bill? |
Hutzpa | Nov-07-09 08:34 PM | #6 |
You know, Im just screwing with you is all |
Oregone | Nov-07-09 08:35 PM | #7 |
You thought I'll go off |
Hutzpa | Nov-07-09 08:46 PM | #10 |
Stupak's amendment failed. Move along.... |
Avalux | Nov-07-09 08:37 PM | #8 |
It failed to a voice vote, but it will go to a tally for final vote. No final verdict yet. |
Parker CA | Nov-07-09 08:38 PM | #9 |
Needs to be voted on though. n/t |
Hutzpa | Nov-07-09 09:34 PM | #11 |
| Oregone
|
Sat Nov-07-09 08:13 PM Response to Original message |
| 1. Why is his bill racist? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Hutzpa
|
Sat Nov-07-09 08:16 PM Response to Reply #1 |
| 2. Because it supresses one faction of |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
| Oregone
|
Sat Nov-07-09 08:18 PM Response to Reply #2 |
| 3. What faction? How? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Hutzpa
|
Sat Nov-07-09 08:22 PM Response to Reply #3 |
| 4. Well |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
| Oregone
|
Sat Nov-07-09 08:24 PM Response to Reply #4 |
| 5. ethnic minorities need more abortions? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Hutzpa
|
Sat Nov-07-09 08:34 PM Response to Reply #5 |
| 6. Have you read the bill? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
| Oregone
|
Sat Nov-07-09 08:35 PM Response to Reply #6 |
| 7. You know, Im just screwing with you is all |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Hutzpa
|
Sat Nov-07-09 08:46 PM Response to Reply #7 |
| 10. You thought I'll go off |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Avalux
|
Sat Nov-07-09 08:37 PM Response to Original message |
| 8. Stupak's amendment failed. Move along.... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Parker CA
|
Sat Nov-07-09 08:38 PM Response to Reply #8 |
| 9. It failed to a voice vote, but it will go to a tally for final vote. No final verdict yet. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Hutzpa
|
Sat Nov-07-09 09:34 PM Response to Reply #8 |
| 11. Needs to be voted on though. n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
| DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sun Nov 22nd 2009, 12:54 AM Response to Original message |
| Advertisements [?] |
| Top |
| Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Links | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2009 Democratic Underground, LLC