Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Marine Commandant Defies White House on DADT

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
HopeOverFear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-02-09 07:01 PM
Original message
Marine Commandant Defies White House on DADT
The Washington Times is reporting that Marine Corps Commandant General James Conway is opposing President Obama's pledge to repeal "don't ask, don't tell." Citing a former senior Pentagon official, the Times says that General Conway, "has emerged in internal Pentagon deliberations as the most outspoken opponent of permitting gay men and women to serve openly in the U.S. military." According to the Times, the official says that "Conway has gone further than others in stating his opposition to a change in policy."

If nothing else, Conway's apparent resistance may be a warning shot to the White House by telegraphing arguments that opponents of repeal will invoke if the Senate holds hearings on "don't ask, don't tell." Given that we are fighting two wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, opponents will say, we just cannot take time out to focus on civil rights issues like gays in the military.

But there could be other implications to the case, some of which have higher stakes than the gays in the military issue. On one hand, even if the White House did not coordinate the leaking of General Conway's views, there is a way in which his opposition plays into the administration's hand. The President, of course, is strongly in favor of repealing the ban. His political reality, however, is that he has to deal with a range of other crises before turning to repeal. What better way to justify going slowly than a statement by the Marine Commandant that we cannot do this now?


Read more at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/aaron-belkin/marine-commandant-defies_b_342532.html
Refresh | +1 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-02-09 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. He won't keep his job long then. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-02-09 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. Oh yeah, there's always
going to be those who try and buck the White House on this.

But, this isn't going to stop progress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-02-09 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. Conway's job is to implement the CIC's orders. He should be fired if he refuses to help repeal DADT
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Jackeens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-02-09 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
4. Fire the fucker.
Edited on Mon Nov-02-09 07:16 PM by Jackeens
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-02-09 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. they will push Obama around til Obama puts a stop to it..just who IS CIC anyway? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-02-09 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. Rahm Emmanuel &/or Goldman Sachs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
PopSixSquish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-02-09 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
6. I Suggest the President Have His Four-Star Marine Corp General
put his foot up General Conway's ass to remind him that both he (Jim Jones - National Security Advisor) and the Commandant serve at the pleasure of the President of the United States. If General Conway has an issue repealing DADT, he can resign his commission...
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Tippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-02-09 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
7. Time to give this fellow his walking papers...........n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-02-09 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
8. Conway needs to remove his bigoted ass from the military. That, or he had
Edited on Mon Nov-02-09 07:56 PM by kestrel91316
best get in line with his CIC if he wants to keep his job and retirement benefits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-02-09 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
9. Time for a replay of Truman vs. MacArthur here. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Sinistrous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-02-09 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
10. Poorly phrased headline.
General Conway may be opposed to a proposed change in policy, but nothing in the article indicates that he is violating existing policy nor does it show that he is disobeying any orders.

Conway is probably a jerk, but he is not "defying" anybody or anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
burning rain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-02-09 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
11. There were general officer resignations in the British army when gays were allowed in.
Let Conway and others go if it turns out that their hatred of gays exceeds their desire to serve their country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DRoseDARs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-02-09 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
12. Rest assured that Obama will quixotically try to find a bipartisan solution to this insubordination.
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-02-09 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
13. Don't let the door hit your butt on the way out, General, nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
santamargarita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-02-09 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
14. New Headline: Marine Commandant Gets Fired
:yoiks:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-02-09 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
16. Leave it to the Washington Times to find this story
Edited on Mon Nov-02-09 08:27 PM by Thrill
.

And the writer in this article is trying to insinuate that the WH leaked this. Which I find as BS. If this was the NYTimes reporting this, the suggestion would be credible. But this is the Washington Times which means this is coming from the Bushes still in the Pentagon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
hileeopnyn8d Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-02-09 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. I didn't even notice
it was from the Washington Times, thanks for pointing that out. I don't trust much of what they print.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
izzybeans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-02-09 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
17. I propose a don't ask don't tell policy for assholes like this bigot. Let him live in a
Edited on Mon Nov-02-09 08:40 PM by izzybeans
closet. See how it feels. Step out of the closet = discharge. BS morale issue solved. Flip the script.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
muntrv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-02-09 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
18. Jimbo, don't let the door hit ya where the good lord split ya!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC