Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

President Obama's Rescue of GM and Chrystler - Did He Directly Save About 250,000 Jobs?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
TomCADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-31-09 10:57 PM
Original message
President Obama's Rescue of GM and Chrystler - Did He Directly Save About 250,000 Jobs?
Edited on Sat Oct-31-09 10:57 PM by TomCADem
We have all hear recent figures putting the number of jobs saved or created by the stimulus at anywhere between 650,000 to 1 million. Of course, the right wing has disputed these numbers, but no one has come up with any numbers that are more accurate. Personally, I think the number is actually understated, because the stimulus figures are based on jobs that are directly created, and does not include an estimate of secondary effects.

However, separate and apart from the stimulus, what about GM and Chrystler? Early in President Obama's term, both companies were facing liquidation. Worse, no other car companies were in the position to buy them as a going concern, and bond holders were threatening to liquidate them, and sell their assets. Instead, President Obama's administration shepparded them through reorganization, and they remain going concerns. Now, GM currently has over 200,000 employees. Chyrtler has about 50,000 employees. While some of these employees may be in other countries, these numbers do not include employees as GM and Chryster car dealers.

The corporate media, of course, ignores these jobs and instead focuses on disputing the stimulus's job creation numbers. However, if you examine the Obama administration's moves objectively, and without an agenda, his administrations efforts have saved hundreds of thousands of jobs in the midst of the deepest recession since the Great Depression?

http://money.cnn.com/2009/10/28/autos/gm_sales_projection/

###

GM clawing back up the sales charts

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- General Motors expects to announce a market share gain for the third month in a row in October, GM executive director of corporate planning Mike DiGiovanni told reporters on Wednesday.

October will also mark the first year-over-year sales gain GM has managed in 21 months, DiGiovanni said. In September, GM's sales were down 47% compared to a year earlier.

"When you look at GM's performance, we're having a really good October," he said.

The automaker expects its vehicle sales will amount to 20% to 21% of all vehicles sold that month, he said. He expects those numbers to be about 3% higher than Toyota's and 4% higher than Ford's, he said.

DiGiovanni credited strong product introductions for the market share rise. Over the past few months, GM has started production on six new or redesigned models: the Chevrolet Camaro performance coupe, Chevrolet Equinox, GMC Terrain and Cadillac SRX small crossover SUVs, Buick LaCrosse luxury sedan and the Cadillac CTS Sportwagon

###
Refresh | +13 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-31-09 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. I read an article a week or so ago that if we hadn't bailed out GM...
...the entire automotive idustry would have crashed. Basically, without the orders from GM, all of the suppliers (who also supply to other manufacturers) would have become insolvent. EVERYBODY would no longer be able to order critical parts.


I printed it out for my supervisor at work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Sebass1271 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-01-09 01:04 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Do you still have that article. I would love to read it and
Edited on Sun Nov-01-09 01:47 AM by Sebass1271
forward to "keep government out of my life" criers and to the ones that THINK obama shoudn't have taken over gm..
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-01-09 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. I tried to find it for you
No luck, not quite sure why.

I printed it out so I know it exists, but I didn't see it in the Farchives...

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
blue_onyx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-01-09 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Is this the article?
"The global auto industry would have collapsed if the U.S. government had not provided taxpayer-backed financing for automakers General Motors and Chrysler, according to the chief executive officer of Motors Liquidation Co.

"If GM had gone down, the world's supply base would have gone down," said Al Koch, speaking at the Reuters Restructuring Summit in New York. Koch was GM's chief restructuring officer during the bankruptcy and now heads the GM unit that is being liquidated."



Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/Restructuring09/idUSTRE5906LM20091001
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-02-09 01:36 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. Yes!
Damn, I thought Reuters had a blue logo. The AP uses red, so I thought I remembered it as being an AP story.

:dunce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Maraya1969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-31-09 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. Thanks for this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-01-09 01:35 AM
Response to Original message
4. These bailouts were handled well.
When I hear right wingers complain, I ask them if they honestly believe that Bush would have let our auto industry fail and if they think it would be fair for our car companies to compete against the heavily subsidized Asian manufacturers. Most people realize that becoming entirely dependent on foreign car companies would be a bad idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-01-09 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. With auto makers offshoring everything, why not let them fail?
They, in effect, forsaken their own countrymen so in return their own countrymen would give 'em big tax bailouts. "I'll scratch your back after you stick your knife into mine."


Though Bush just didn't give a damn about anything except short-term greed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-01-09 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Links to issues going back... to 2003 (if not earlier!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-01-09 07:43 AM
Response to Original message
5. I think you're right because remember in the summer.....
Edited on Sun Nov-01-09 07:44 AM by Clio the Leo
..... the unemployment numbers were less than expected because forecasters were counting on GM layoffs that never happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-01-09 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. They were less than expected?
Edited on Sun Nov-01-09 05:47 PM by AllentownJake
Geithner was on TV today saying he was surprised by the unemployment numbers.

Not questioning you, just more going back to my prime belief that Geithner is an incompetent pathological liar and douche.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-01-09 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. lol, you are to questioning me.....
.... but there's not anything wrong with that.

This is what I'm referring to...

Payrolls fall less than expected; July unemployment rate drops
Updated 8/7/2009

By Paul Davidson, USA TODAY
WASHINGTON — Employers shed 247,000 jobs in July, fewest in nearly a year, bolstering forecasts for a third-quarter economic recovery.
Some economists, however, say the numbers were skewed by an unusual flurry of job additions in the automobile industry.

The unemployment rate fell to 9.4% from 9.5% in June, as 422,000 Americans left the labor force, including discouraged workers who gave up their job searches, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

The 247,000 payroll jobs lost were the fewest since last August and handily beat analysts' projections of about 325,000. Manufacturing, finance and professional services cut substantially fewer workers than expected

<snip>

Other encouraging signs: The so-called underemployment rate, which includes the unemployed, people working part-time although they want full-time work, and those who stopped looking for work, dipped to 16.3% from 16.5%. The average work week edged up to 33.1 hours from a record low 33 hours. And average hourly wages rose to $18.56 from $18.53 in July.

Wachovia economist Mark Vitner says the relatively modest number of job losses in July was skewed by auto factories' moves to restart production a month earlier than usual, after closing for several months because of lackluster sales. Auto manufacturers gained about 28,000 workers after shedding 26,000 in previous months, and ripples likely affected other industries, such as steel-makers, he says.

http://www.usatoday.com/money/economy/2009-08-07-july-unemployment_N.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
impik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-01-09 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
6. Oh come on, stop confusing people with facts...
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Kdillard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-01-09 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
7. Thanks. I still can't believe people who think that helping American companies
and keeping people working is a bad idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
butterfly77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-01-09 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
12. The question I always want asked by these commentators..
Edited on Sun Nov-01-09 05:45 PM by butterfly77
talking head host is what was the republiCON plan? How was it going to work? And how was the their tax cut going to help people who had just lost their jobs? From what I have been watching they have put a tax cuts for businesses throughout every bill that has come up so what else would they do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-01-09 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
14. GM was a good bailout
The company was restructured, there were strong conditions set, and management was shown the door.

As opposed to the banks, where no conditions were set, nothing was restructured, and management got bonuses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
damonm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-02-09 02:37 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. GM was bailed under Obama...the Banks under Bush.
See the difference?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC