Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Maher: "When did the fierce urgency of now turn into, "Please continue to hold." "

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-25-09 09:59 PM
Original message
Maher: "When did the fierce urgency of now turn into, "Please continue to hold." "
That was the last line of Bill Maher's end of show New Rules editorial tonight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-25-09 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. When things aren't happening fast
enough for those who aren't doing the work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MarjorieG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-25-09 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Or having to get results from Congress, who don't want to work-for us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-25-09 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. There's more than a few obstacles
but the important part is we have people in charge who are dealing in reality and want to get it done.

Anybody can get on a soapbox and whine that it's not fast enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-26-09 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #4
21. You must stop accusing progressives of whining and of not 'dealing' reality.'
Your constant use of the "whining" label is tiresome and unfair. It is also rather odd because you have accused LGBTs of whining because of our legitimate grievances at Obama for his lack of "fierce urgency" when it comes to stopping the discharge of gays and lesbians in the military (which he can do right now by means of Stop-Loss orders), his continued defence of DOMA in the courts, and his opposition to full equality to LGBTs (despite his empty words to the contrary).

And I haven't even touched his deal with Big Pharma, his carrying water for Big Insurer by keeping Single-Payer off the table, his continued pursuit and expansion of Bush's imperialist policies in Latin America and elsewhere, his refusal to reverse Bush's assault on the Constitution and our civil liberties, and his keeping our hard-pressed troops in Afghanistan in limbo while he goes through "buyer's remorse" of the war strategies he himself announced earlier this year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-26-09 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #21
32. excellent post, i wish i could recommend it. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-26-09 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
27. GOP obstructionists are the biggest obstacles, atop their cash boxes.
Let's continue doing what our President asked us to-- let him and our legislators know what we want. Wanting change more quickly is not WHINING-- it is recognizing national emergencies and supporting our president's acknowledgment that change is urgently required.

GOP obstructionists know they can impede our President with delaying tactics like tacking 500+ amendments onto a bad bill to make it worse and then try to debate each amendment for an hour.

Those of us who demand faster change are trying to embolden our Democratic legislators to fight against the GOP obstructionists. We are speaking up about the needs of the large majority that voted President Obama into office. And thank goodness our president has asked us to do that.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-26-09 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. I'm not saying everyone who criticizes Obama is
whining..I know the difference. I'm talking about the really nasty whining.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-26-09 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. all you're doing is mainly attacking progressives on this board.

<< I'm talking about the really nasty whining. >>

and i'm talking about the really nasty bullying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-25-09 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. But like Bill said, Medicare was providing benefits 8 months after it got passed
Now, even our response to climate change won't affect the problem for another decade. He has a point, that being that America knew how to get things done in the past and has somehow lost that ability or desire.

I remember those days. The days of Eisenhower and Kennedy and Johnson when big things like Medicare and Food Stamp proposals were accomplished and went into effect quickly after making it through Congress. Needs were met. I remember when moms on AFDC could actually go to college or trade school and it was paid for. Now, it's an outrage to propose health care for all.

Today was a tough day. I got into the face of an old fool in front of my library. Wait, here's the url for that story.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=142x7432

And now I have to go hang out on our enclosed front porch and try to catch the bastards that drove across our front yard two Saturday nights in a row. Nothing like having your labor of love destroyed by people who get a perverse kick out of destruction.

Right now I'm not so in love with where my country has gone. It's going to be a long four years. I hope Obama keeps the faith. I certainly need some lifting up right about now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MarjorieG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-25-09 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Heard from soneone reputable that we could make whatever we plan faster, but would take money...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-25-09 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. Oh dear, I'm so sorry about the
vandalism on your front yard, eleny. That's a terrible violation and invasion of your property. :hug:

I used to live in Lakewood, Co in 1990 to '92 on Pikeview and drive into Denver to work at Cherry Creek shopping center..

How stupid to stand in front of a library and ask for lower taxes when it's our taxes that have made those libraries possible along with all the other services that people appreciate when they're needed.

At least we're on a reality path..I know the wheels are moving slowly and it won't always be linear but we're so fortunate in our country, as you know, that the fearwing did not take over the White House again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-26-09 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #13
25. Thanks, hon
You know how I want the president to succeed. It's really the only option.

Along with all the other happy horseshit going on, we got notification from our retirement association (the state PERA) that our health insurance premiums are going up 30% come December. Oh joy. So I'm going to switch my option and opt for a higher deductible that's about double what it is now. What's annoying is how that option can make a person think twice about going to the doc when you think you might need to see them. We can afford it. But my concern is for those retirees who can't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Manifestor_of_Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-25-09 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. Michael Moore is on.
I'm watching it in Central Time.

Also he will have Eliot Spitzer and the guy Randi Rhodes lusts after, Paul Krugman.

:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-25-09 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. It's a good show tonight
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-25-09 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
5. Congress moves sloooow.
And bringing about something like health care takes time, its a huge change to our system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-25-09 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Meantime, people die
Excuse me if I'm not so thrilled with reality tonight. :hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-26-09 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #8
20. Its okay. The process of change moves like molasses and that can be aggravating.
Its understandable to be frustrated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-27-09 02:08 AM
Response to Reply #20
45. Molasses kills.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Life Long Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-25-09 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
9. When they want to run out the clock to the final second.
It adds drama to the ratings game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-25-09 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
10. Why is Bill blaming Obama for the slow pace of Congress?
And he surely is blaming Obama because he was the one who would always talk about MLK and the fierce urgency of Now during the campaign
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Touchdown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-27-09 01:56 AM
Response to Reply #10
41. The OP didn't give you enough info. Bill was not criticizing the slow pace.
He was criticizing why implementation of these bills will be 4-6-10 years away.

Medicare was passed in 1965. Seniors were getting their benefits 18 months later. Now, it's 35 MPG by 2020. Big woop!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomCADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-25-09 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
11. Obama Is Trying To Do Too Much!/Obama Is Not Doing Enough!
What is the talking point of the moment?

Or, is it:

Obama is not out there advocating for health care reform!/Obama is over exposed!

*yawn*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-25-09 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. +1
I've lost track myself!!!

:crazy:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rockymountaindem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-26-09 12:19 AM
Response to Original message
15. It happened in the year 1787
when the framers of the Constitution decided to make a system of government that pitted politicians' goals against each other and placed an emphasis on the rights of the minority as a way to prevent too much change from happening all at once, lest we drive off a cliff. The US government is designed to work sloooooooow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpartanDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-26-09 01:34 AM
Response to Original message
16. I think we all thought we'd get more done this year
but the reality of the speed that Congress operates, pushing these challenging big issues like cap and trade, health care and financial reform that always move slowly. Then there's not having 60 votes for most of the year with Franken's election issues and with Kennedy's illness. You have a White House who is reluctant to add anything else to it's plate so they've put off things like EFCA and DADT In many was it's been frustrating, but I think after health care is done that things will pick up. I also find not getting caught up in the daily media mood swings really helps with sanity, I think would've had a stroke if I took at face value every report about what Obama is going do, what he's not going do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl_interrupted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-26-09 01:50 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. eleny Maher had a good show tonite, but I am confused about something
The show was very thought provoking & I thought Maher & his guests provided some interesting insight. What confuses me is this...When Obama originally started with healthcare reform, he said it would have to happen by August. Did Obama know at that time, that members of his own party were on board with this ? How can you put a deadline on something, unless you are certain you have the votes? I know republicans have thrown a few roadblocks up, but so have members of our own party. Would it have been better if Obama knew for certain, his own party would go along with it before proceeding with a deadline? Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-26-09 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #17
23. I don't think so
Presidents have the bully pulpit and always work to get their party members on board even if they disagree or hesitate.

There are lots of threads around DU recently pointing out the tactics that LBJ used to convince members of Congress to go along with his policies. I don't believe that Obama needs to follow the Johnson model. But LBJ is an example of a president working with members who need coaxing to go along with him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-26-09 08:16 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. No we "all" didn't, I had expected Obama over 8 years to change health care and energy and smash the
...GOPs current culture into something Americans can't stand
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-26-09 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
18. Maher post on DU
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uzybone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-26-09 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
22. Dont take Maher seriously, he is a comedian, and clown and at times a fool
Us who have been watching his show since the jump remember the time where he was advocating Bushs' strategy in Iraq (pre-surge), saying stupid things like "maybe history will vindicate him". Take anything he says with a trailer load of salt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-26-09 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. My monthly health insurance premium just went up 30%
Maher's message hit home last night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-26-09 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
26. I liked his making those points-- and using the protest chant--
What do we want-- modest incremental improvements!
When do we want 'em-- in 2016 !!

And really appreciated his pointing out that when Medicare was passed in 1965, seniors began receiving services eleven months later. That was part of a whole list of significant national changes made in shorter time spans.

Yes, sure, we can say we understand that change takes time, but pasting 564 amendments, each requiring an hour of discussion at least, onto the Finance Committee health "reform" bill that many described as greatly flawed, is clearly a delaying tactic. Will our legislators then need to proceed with 500+ amendments to the health reform bills of the six other committees? I suppose the answer is YES if the GOP can still wield their 25% popularity as though it is a mandate against change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-26-09 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
28. SInce when does the "fierce urgency of now" mean right this
Edited on Sat Sep-26-09 12:54 PM by Phx_Dem
second, or in my first 3 months; which is when this this absurd argument began. It's already March and Obama hasn't repealed all the anti gay rights laws! He hasn't fixed the ALL of financial regulations problems! He hasn't fixed the unemployment problem! I STILL don't have health care!! :cry: :cry:

Mahr is a decent entertainer, but no one takes him too seriously on politics, and this is why. Even though he's a smart man, he's a whiner who has no concept of reality.

If Bill could pull his head out of his ass for a minute, he would realize that "now" means in our time as in "during my term," not immediately after I finish my inauguration speech. We're a democracy that relys on more than one branch of government to enact legislation -- and that takes time, and planning.

But this is what Mahr's problem has always been -- he can't see the forest for the trees. He wishes Obama was a progressive Raul Castro or some other dictator that doesn't have to consult or work with anyone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-26-09 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. "fierce urgency" implies one helluva lot
One thing for sure, it doesn't mean "hold your horses".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-26-09 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. It means it's important. And who is holding their horses, exactly?
Edited on Sat Sep-26-09 02:42 PM by Phx_Dem
What's the matter, isn't the economic recovery, the nearing of health care reform passage, the thwarting of 4 imminent terrorist attacks, a new Supreme Court Justice, a tax cut, the extention of CHIP, and about a dozen other things enough for you in the first eight months?

I suppose you could always move to Cuba where Castro makes laws immediately without consulting anyone -- just the way Mahr likes it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-26-09 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #31
38. Hyperbole isn't the best tool for you to use in this discussion
Obama asked us to hold our horses when he said, "... we shouldn't let the perfect be the enemy of the good."

Instead of moving full speed ahead towards the goal of achieving a strong public option, he was asking us to begin to settle for something less.

This is how I interpret his sentiment. You're entitled to disagree.

I'm done with you regarding this issue since you chose the route of an ad hominem attack. Please take the last word if you wish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ipaint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-26-09 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #29
35. The longer health care reform can be drawn out the more money floods
washington on both sides of the aisle. This whole manufactured ordeal isn't about doing what is right by the citizens it is about creating the appearance of doing something while making sure corporations, who apparently are our real ruling bodies, make it through this faux reform intact, grossly profitable and preferably much stronger.

This isn't taking a long time because they are figuring out how to best implement a truly universal program available to all americans funded with taxpayer dollars going directly to health care. It isn't about honestly dealing with climate change and sitting down to figure out the best way to move forward asap.

It's all about corporations remaining intact and looking at increased profits in the foreseeable future. If they can pretty that one and only goal up with a couple crumbs for a few of us, after all it's our tax dollars they are looting, and call it the result of the impossibly long and hard work of reform they all whine about, mission accomplished.



The Story of Mouseland
As told by Tommy Douglas in 1944

snip

"...All the laws were good laws. For cats. But, oh, they were hard on the mice. And life was getting harder and harder. And when the mice couldn't put up with it any more, they decided something had to be done about it. So they went en masse to the polls. They voted the black cats out. They put in the white cats.

Now the white cats had put up a terrific campaign. They said: "All that Mouseland needs is more vision." They said:"The trouble with Mouseland is those round mouseholes we got. If you put us in we'll establish square mouseholes." And they did. And the square mouseholes were twice as big as the round mouseholes, and now the cat could get both his paws in. And life was tougher than ever.

And when they couldn't take that anymore, they voted the white cats out and put the black ones in again. Then they went back to the white cats. Then to the black cats. They even tried half black cats and half white cats. And they called that coalition. They even got one government made up of cats with spots on them: they were cats that tried to make a noise like a mouse but ate like a cat.

You see, my friends, the trouble wasn't with the colour of the cat. The trouble was that they were cats. And because they were cats, they naturally looked after cats instead of mice."

http://www.dcf.ca/en/mouseland.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-26-09 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #28
34. Way to be ignorant on LGBT issues
"It's already March and Obama hasn't repealed all the anti gay rights laws!"

Please, do you honestly think that's why the community is pissed off? Because it all isn't being done right now? Since that seems to be your impression, allow me to educate you.

DADT has not been touched. Lives are being destroyed on account of it. The President has it within him power to cease the discharges. He chooses not to.

The DOJ continues to defend DOMA in court, with an almost blithe unconcern for how offensive and awful their various legal strategies are. They sort of learned back in June due to the massive outrage in the LGBT community. And by learn, I mean they say "Sorry!" before slapping us in the face again.

The administration has done next to nothing on LGBT issues to date.

NOTHING.

Oh, I'm sorry, some partners of employees in federal government get moving expenses now.

What the hell, it's only our lives. We're so petulant and impatient about that whole Getting Fuck-All from the President who promised to be our "fierce advocate."

It isn't about "all right now". It's about direction. He got the world's biggest homophobe at the inauguration, gave us a solemn promise that wasn't indicative of things to come, and then did nothing whatsoever to allay the community's anxiety that our very equality is that the very bottom of the barrel of this administration's priorities.

Everything? Hell, I'd settle for something at this point. The only time the President bothers at all is when the community gets so pissed off that he has to listen because we shut off all the fundraising valves. Meanwhile, whenever we do, we're endlessly told here we're whining about ponies, or poutraged, or ungrateful, or whatever's-wrong-with-gays-this-week.

We're so touchy about our lives, ya know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-26-09 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. Thank you
Maher was addressing the issue of health care reform and climate change. And in those issues lives are being lost day by day. Your assertion of lives being destroyed in the LGBT community as well is spot on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Touchdown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-27-09 02:05 AM
Response to Reply #28
44. Shove a chainsaw up your ass, one who has all his rights now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-26-09 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
37. The Michael Moore interview
before will be removed from YouTube

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9_6dAvVfABQ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-27-09 12:45 AM
Response to Original message
39. Maher blew a golden opportunity with that show.
He should have started with Michael Moore and let that lead into a free discussion with the Nobel economist and the Sheriff of Wall Street FOR THE REST OF THE HOUR. You don't fly those guys across the country just to treat them like Joe Schmoe from Topeka for chrissakes and cut away to 40 minutes of bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Touchdown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-27-09 02:02 AM
Response to Reply #39
43. Blasphemy! John Waters is KING!
He's always great no matter what he's on. And they were still able to talk with Waters there. Besides, now you know the movie where teabagging came from.;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-27-09 01:00 AM
Response to Original message
40. Possibly Maher is discovering that sometimes thing are happening that you don't see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Touchdown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-27-09 01:59 AM
Response to Original message
42. Eleny, posters here don't know in what context Maher said that.
You should have let them know about the slow implementation of the bills, such as 25mpg by 2020, or a public option by 2015.

Almost everybody here is under the assumption that he's talking about the slow pace of congressional sausage making.

You didn't give enough info. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Touchdown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-27-09 02:13 AM
Response to Original message
46. Maher should have brought up the speed on how telecom immunity was implemented.
11 months for Medicare to begin working... how about telecom immunity retroactive to 2001?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC