Judge Carter Grants Defendent's Ex Parte Application in Barnett v. Obama

[WeDidIt]

And the hits just keep on rolling in:

The Court hereby GRANTS Defendants’ Ex Parte Application for Limited Stay of Discovery

"<snip>

Before the Court is Defendants’ Ex Parte Application for Limited Stay of Discovery (the
"Motion"). The Court finds the Motion to be appropriate for decision without oral argument. FED. R.
CIV. P. 78; Local Rule 7-15. After considering the moving and opposing papers thereon, and for the
reasons set forth below, the Court hereby GRANTS Defendants’ Motion."

<snip>

"All discovery herein shall be stayed pending resolution of Defendants’ Motion to
Dismiss, except for any discovery as to which Plaintiffs can demonstrate, to the satisfaction fo
Magistrate Judge Nakazato, is necessary for the purpose of opposing the Motion to Dismiss."

<snip>

Orly is having a very bad week.

If I had to guess, I'd say that Carter will be dismissing this case on October 5.

[Xipe Totec]

1. Here comes the Judge!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3hIcKkKID8k

[leftynyc]

2. Does this mean

there will be no discovery until the motion to dismiss is decided?

[WeDidIt]

4. Except discovery pertinent to arguing against the motion to dismiss

That's why it's limited.

Unfortunately for Taitz, her list of items for discovery in her fishing expedition has no bearing on the motion to dismiss, though she will try any way.

she's going to get sanctioned by Land some time soon in Georgia, too.

[LiberalFighter]

3. The plaintiff uses their title but not the title of the defendant?

Bunch of racist shankapotamuses!!