Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Taitz Files Motion To Reconsider In Rhodes v. MacDonald Birther Case

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 11:46 AM
Original message
Taitz Files Motion To Reconsider In Rhodes v. MacDonald Birther Case
Edited on Thu Sep-17-09 11:46 AM by WeDidIt
The batshit insanity is radioactive:

http://ia311028.us.archive.org/1/items/gov.uscourts.gam...

A few of the jucier tidbits of batshit insanity:

"Plaintiff avers that there is increasing evidence that the United States District Courts in the 11th Circuit are subject to political pressure, external control, and, mostly likely, subservience to the same illegitimate chain of command which Plaintiff has previously protested in this case, except that the de facto President is not even nominally the Commander-in-Chief of the Article III Judiciary."


"It is reasonably certain that the men who framed the Constitution did not anticipate the election of a man as a President who appears to have prevaricated about his place of birth and then ordered his loyal followers to ridicule all those who questioned the contradictions inherent in his own biography, such as the obvious fact that his Father was an (admittedly disloyal and possibly treacherous) Subject of the British Crown when he was born, even though this fact alone would disqualify the President as a natural born citizen, regardless of his place of birth."


"This Court has threatened the undersigned counsel with sanctions for advocating that a legally conscious, procedurally sophisticated, and constitutionally aware army officers corps is the best protection against the encroachment of anti-democratic, authoritarian, neo-Fascistic or Palaeo-Communistic dictatorship in this country, without pointing to any specific language, facts, or allegations of fact in the Complaint or TRO as frivolous. Rule 11 demands more of the Court than use of its provisions as a means of suppressing the First Amendment Right to Petition regarding questions of truly historical, in fact epic and epochal, importance in the history of this nation."


"This Court has threatened the undersigned counsel with sanctions for failure to present facts, and yet has ignored or disregarded the facts concerning Barack Hussein Obamas birthplace sub iudice aliena which were submitted to the Court in the form of the 1961 Hospital Birth Certificate submitted in the Plaintiffs request for judicial notice (Document 10, entered September 11, 2009) in addition the consistent but later dated Certificate which was submitted as an Exhibit to the Complaint and original Application for Temporary Restraining Order. These documents are FACTS and they went unimpeached, unquestioned, and yet utterly unaddressed in this Courts order of summary dismissal. The fact that the President has admitted his Father was not a citizen, but a British Subject, at the time of birth, is an incontrovertible fact, which supports Plaintiffs charges that the President is an alien."


"Plaintiff submits that the clear preponderance of the credible evidence is that, in quite a few ways, Defendant Barack Hussein Obama has toyed with and manipulated his identity in order to obtain the President, and therefore won the hard fought Presidential Campaign of 2008 by fraud and trickery against the American People. The Court should reconsider the seriousness of its swift dismissal of this Plaintiffs claims."


:rofl:

There's more at the link. This thing oozes batshit insanity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. Eventually, they will hold her for psychological evaluation. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
42. 'to obtain the President' ... usually I applaud people of other
languages giving English a shot but not this time. Damn, woman, get a second reader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatGund Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #42
58. The funny thing?
This one wasn't written by Dr. Orly. It was written by her "Law Clerk", disbarred felon Charles E. Lincoln III, a "Sovereign Citizen" and Neo-Confederate who's been riding Dr. Orly's coattails of late and playing attorney on her license
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #58
71. I was wondering about that. After seeing her interviewed, it didn't seem to me that she
Edited on Thu Sep-17-09 11:26 PM by beac
would be capable of stringing together a proper, if batshitnutty, sentence. The only bit that sounds like her is the "obtain the President" part. That's pure Zsa-Zsa, I mean Orly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
2. wow she is begging for contempt of court charges

She is probably hoping for an overnight stay in jail to be a martyr. Instead she will find her license suspended and a nice fine coming her way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wroberts189 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
16. Indeed ..and the judge has already basically called her crazy as well.


With his Alice in wonderland comment in the ruling... basically saying she has gone down the rabbit hole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demoiselle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
20. What? This woman actually has a license to practice law?
Wow. Where? What planet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. She's admitted to teh California Bar
California is the only state that will allow a person to sit the bar exam if they have a JD from an unacredited law school.

Taitz attended an online law school that does one thing for three years, teaches one how to pass the California Bar Exam. They teach no other concepts of law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dccrossman Donating Member (530 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
69. I think this hits the nail on the head
Yeah, her license will get suspended, and she'll get fined. Then she'll get a ghostwriter, and the usual suspects will see to it that her book becomes a bestseller. Then she'll do the lecture circuit (hopefully after getting a language coach).

I can see it now:
Taitz: "On the front lines fighting an illegal presidency" AKA "Birther or BUST"

Not sure if I'm being sarcastic, cynical, or if I've just lost all faith in humanity.

Peace!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MidwestTransplant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
3. OMG I thougth that was satire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WorseBeforeBetter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
4. A rubber room is not far off...
and how exactly does one "obtain the President"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bodhi BloodWave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
5. Unless i'm wrong
Isn't she supposed to SIGN these motions for them to be valid/proper?

so once again she is filing incomplete motions, which leaves me to say one thing to her: :yourock: keep up the good work

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eShirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
6. sure Orly, keep poking that bear with a stick
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #6
48. Maybe next she should call the judge at home and offer to fix his teeth in exchange
for a favorable ruling on one of her motions
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
7. Sanctions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
8. Batshit crazy is an understatement in describing her....
Even the batshit crazies are disowning her!

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. She's mayor of the Village
Idiots and she wants to keep her job :silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. LOL, it shows how delusional and galactically bizarre she really is when....
even her Village Idiots are now saying "Orly who?"!

I hope she keeps it up now that the birfers, turfers and racists (often the same people) are identified as being the repub base. They can run from her but they cannot hide the fact she is one of them.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. Next orly will be on the cover of Time Mag with
soft squishy covering like glen bech. Birfers in arms.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Milspec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #8
59. I am the president of the society of
Bat shit crazy people and even we have disowned her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KingFlorez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
9. Disbarment right now
This insanity needs to end immediately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
11. orly's goin down
Judge will ding her for this. She'll fight it. She'll lose. She'll fight some more and get dinged some more. Eventually she'll lose her license. She's started down a path from which she can't recover.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lugnut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
13. Hoo boy.
Oily is itching for some time in Slammer City. :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalAndProud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
14. When will they disbar?
I know there is a motion, but when will it be heard. The courts need to stop wasting time on this crap. I hope the sanctions the court imposes are stringent.

Orly wants to martyr herself to this insanity, I am sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
15. Orly Taitz suffers from delusions of grandeur, that much is clear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladywnch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
17. Are there any attorneys out there who can walk us through the disbarment
process if there is one?

Can these actions she has been engaging in get her disbarred?

And if she was only licensed in CA how is she allowed to argue cases in other states?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. She's only a member of teh CA bar and there is a filing to get her disbarred there
Edited on Thu Sep-17-09 12:46 PM by WeDidIt
She applies for admission to practice in various federal districts pro hac vice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladywnch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. thanks, but what is the rest of the process for disbarment.
do her actions qualify for disbarment? how long does the process normally take?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Once admitted tot eh bar, it's tough as hell to disbar
no matter what state you practice in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. this crap makes it easier.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Lane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #24
39. I agree. I don't think she's come CLOSE to conduct that would support disbarment.
The filing of some cases that get thrown out isn't even the beginning of a case for disbarment.

The complaint comes closer with some of the more specific allegations, such as ex parte conduct with judges. Nevertheless, disbarment is the ultimate sanction. It's rarely applied.

The first thing that's likely to happen to her is that, at some point, a court will hit her with Rule 11 sanctions for frivolous litigation. That would mean that she'd have to reimburse the defendants for their attorney's fees. That alone should cool her jets a bit.

In addition, some courts, when faced with persistent vexatious litigation, have imposed special requirements: "This particular party (or attorney) must present any case in advance and receive the court's permission to file and serve it."

In the bar disciplinary process, there are steps before disbarment. I don't know the specific California law, but typical would be an escalating ladder of disciplinary measures like:
* issuance of a letter of admonition
* formal censure
* suspension from practice for a period of time (six months, two years, whatever).

My advice is that everybody sit back, relax, and enjoy the Orly Show for its entertainment value (and for its potential for driving a wedge between some Republican electeds and the crazier elements of their base). Don't pin your hopes on the long shot of disbarment.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. Sanctions under Rule 11 are days away.
Judge Land specifically adminished her not to bring another frivolous suit to his court in his ruling from yesterday and today she filed a motion to reconsider.

She will definitely receive sancionts under Rule 11 now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #39
44. delete dupe
Edited on Thu Sep-17-09 03:18 PM by onenote
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #39
45. agreed. the fun will start when she is ordered to pay costs
and refuses.

She's working her way up to the level that in many states (I too don't know the specifics of California law on this) to an admonition, censure, or even suspension.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Lane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #45
46. I doubt she'll refuse to pay
She's admitted only in California, and files all these suits around the country by being admitted in other jurisdictions pro hac vice. I think many of those courts would refuse to admit her, even pro hac vice, if she had defied a sanctions assessment issued by another federal judge. That would bring her whole operation outside California to a screeching halt. Even in California she'd be subject to some sort of discipline (and, I suppose, attachment of her bank account if need be).

Her more likely reaction is to appeal the sanctions order, ask that it be stayed pending the appeal, and of course call for the recusal (and possibly the treason trial) of any judge who exhibits bias by ruling against her.

If she eventually does have to pay any sanctions, she will play the martyr card to the hilt. She'll use the order as a basis for fundraising and probably raise more money from the nutjobs than she has to pay in sanctions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. She's to the federal level in CA, too
so she'd have problems there, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladywnch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #39
61. thank you so very much. I had a hard time believing that
any serious action was forthcoming. I appreciate you putting it in lay perspective.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kaiden Donating Member (811 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #18
53. And according to the Georgia docket,
she's never filed a pro hac application in the USDC of Middle District Georgia. Of course, she'd have to have sponsorship by a Georgia law firm or lawyer to do so . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalAndProud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #17
36. I'm also curious.
From what I've been able to discern, the State Bar Court of California must make a recommendation for disbarment to the California Supreme Court. There are no Orly Taitz actions currently on the State Bar Court's calendar.

It took more than a year for Richard Fine to be disbarred after the initial hearing before the State Bar Court. October, 2007 - February, 2009.

The wheels of justice, and all that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demigoddess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
21. seems to me it is all based on the mother's nationality doesn't count
just another piece of republican (nitwit) misogyny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Qutzupalotl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. Neither parent's nationality counts.
If you're born in America, you're a citizen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #26
33. Exactly. Funny how the RWers KNOW that when it comes to
"anchor babies" as they call babies born here by illegal immigrants. Their children born here ARE citizens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ljm2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-18-09 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #33
78. Excellent point!
And it is, er, "funny", isn't it?

OTOH this Orly Taitz thing is getting to be somewhat entertaining in its own way... She may end up discrediting the Birther movement better than any of us could do, simply by demonstrating the outright lunacy upon which it is based.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Lane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #21
40. No, it's not anti-female, it's anti-youth.
Under the statute that was in effect at the time, Ann Dunham couldn't convey U.S. citizenship to a child she bore outside the U.S. because she was only 18. If someone was indeed born in Kenya with one U.S. citizen parent, that parent had to have lived in the U.S. for five years after turning 14, and hence had to be at least 19.

Therefore, IF they could somehow show that Obama really was born in Kenya and that all the contrary documentation is the product of the most sweeping conspiracy in human history, THEN they'd be correct that he wasn't a citizen.

Of course, because he was born in Hawaii, all this is moot. He was a natural-born citizen regardless of the citizenship of his parents. The only exception is for children born to foreign ambassadors. Such children enjoy diplomatic immunity as of birth, and therefore aren't subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, and therefore aren't within the Fourteenth Amendment ("All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.").
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-18-09 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #40
80. an 18 year old woman doesn't
Edited on Fri Sep-18-09 12:08 PM by xxqqqzme
attain majority when she marries? Here in CA, a woman attains majority when she becomes pregnant (which is why the parental consent requirement initiatives are crazy).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Lane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-18-09 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #80
81. Obama's citizenship is governed by the law in effect in 1961, when he was born
Furthermore, the law about transmission of citizenship wasn't phrased in terms of the age of majority. It simply required five years' residence in the United States after the parent's fourteenth birthday. I think that a mother could have been 25 years old and her child (born abroad, with a non-U.S. citizen father) still wouldn't have been a citizen if the 25-year-old mother had lived outside the United States for a lot of time in her adolescence and young adulthood. (The law was substantially revised during the 1980s, so it would take a little digging in legal archives to confirm this point -- and no one cares about it except the birthers, because everyone else knows that Obama was born in Hawaii.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kwassa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
25. Palaeo-Communistic? Are those the Cavemen Communists?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
27. the fuckwad is a stupid piece of shit as well at insane
disbar the filth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nemo137 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
29. Christ, she wants to be a martyr so bad.
Wasn't she warned off of this sort of thing by the court?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. I think she beleives she's "calling Land's bluff"
She'll be surprised as shit when she finds out Land wasn't bluffing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
31. "It is reasonably certain that the men who framed the Constitution did not anticipate the election
of..." a BLACK man! Why don't they just come out and say what they really mean? And it's true-Black people were considered less than human by "the men who framed the Constitution." :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. That is reasonably certain
It's reasonably certain that none of the original founders of this nation ever envisioned a day when a black man would be president.

The glimpse of that possibility took another four score and seven years...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. Yup. And as we know,
"conservatives" are against change. They probably wish we were still back in the days of slavery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. Shhhhhhhhh!!!!!
The birthers will pull the 3/5 rule out of their ass and claim that since Obama is African American, he's not really 48. Instead, he's 3/5 of 48 which is 29 thus he doesn't meet the age requirement.

:silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #37
43. ...
Very creative! I don't think those people can do the math like that, though. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yavin4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #34
52. ""conservatives" are against change. They probably wish we were still back in the days of slavery."
Nah. Then Glen Beck would go on and on about how slaves get free housing, free food, and free medical care while the hard working White man has to pay for all of that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #31
55. True, and they did not anticipate that women could vote
Edited on Thu Sep-17-09 04:13 PM by treestar
And they certainly never anticipated a woman becoming a lawyer and then filing lunatic cases in courts.

Or many other things, so that argument is ridiculous! :rofl:

maybe next she'll try with - Obama is just 3/5 the President! :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #31
57. that's what jumped out at me too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KatyaR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
35. Can't we arrest this nutcase for treason and deport her?
Just kick her out of the country, for crap's sake.

Is she a citizen or is she here on a green card? Surely Immigration can do something about a bat-shit crazy alien . . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #35
65. There's something about Oily Taters that brings out the horrible bigot in me.
The same part of me that reacts so viscerally to Indian tech support people has me rather pissed that a crazy immigrant Russian Jew with a funny accent is declaring that the President of the United States is illegitimate.

Yes, it's bigoted and horrible of me, I know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #65
68. You're nicer than I am; I think she should be selling $10 blow jobs in Canarsie or Brighton Beach
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #68
70. I picture her as a white, female Tyrone Biggums.
If you don't know who he is, Google it or search Youtube.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beaverhausen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
38. she is one of those "fifth-column' nutjobs that Frank Schaefer was talking about
last night on Rachel. The facts do not matter to these crazies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
49. Batshit crazy gluton for punishment! Charge that lunatic with contempt!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
50. Do I hear the sound of judicial sanctions approaching?
This bitch was warned by a judge to refrain from frivolous lawsuits, and here she goes again!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #50
51. Yeah, here's the funny bit
Land gave her just enough rope. He set her up to file this shit and end up in deep shit.

She'll never be allowed to practice pro hac vice in another federal venue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yodermon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
54. "Commander-in-Chief of the Article III Judiciary." ?
huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monk06 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-18-09 01:04 AM
Response to Reply #54
74. Yeah but it has a nice legal ring to it if you are an illiterate Morovian Fascist


working for Israeli Intelligence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MidwestTransplant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
56. Already commented once but have to again. WHAT A WACKADOODLE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
60. This part is great
It is reasonably certain that the men who framed the Constitution did not anticipate the election of a man as a President who appears to have prevaricated about his place of birth and then ordered his loyal followers to ridicule all those who questioned the contradictions inherent in his own biography.


We don't need no fucking orders to ridicule :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Bacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
62. This asshole is openly committing treason!
This ass needs to be indicted and tried for treason NOW!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-18-09 12:38 AM
Response to Reply #62
73. not really. she's just committing stupid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-19-09 07:19 AM
Response to Reply #62
84. She *wishes*.
For her faceplant after spectacular faceplant, President Obama is eventually going to owe her thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laelth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
63. Unacceptable. She deserves to be sanctioned for that.
Throw her in jail for contempt of Court.

:dem:

-Laelth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
64. So Obama is Ernst Stavro Blofeld?
Geez, Oily Taintz is fucking crazy. She should be locked up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
66. She should be disbarred AKA have her internet access cut off
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liquid diamond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
67. Some people don't know when to stay the fuck down. Damn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladywnch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
72. I have to say it, I do find it rather ironic that most of these people
are middle/older aged people. Older enough to remember when the Soviet Union was the "ENEMY"....you couldnt' trust them.....they were all evil.....the only good Ruski was a dead Ruski....etc. And yet they are now listening to a crackpot from the former Soviet Union as their savior....the only person they can trust on this mission.

My how the times have changed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GivePeaceAchance Donating Member (950 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-18-09 01:05 AM
Response to Original message
75. It's just a darn nerve from Taitz who couldn't run for President herself by birth..
Edited on Fri Sep-18-09 01:08 AM by GivePeaceAchance
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monk06 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-18-09 01:11 AM
Response to Original message
76. Next she'll be asking the entire 11th curcuit to recuse itself so she can go directly to the

Supreme Court.

I'm pretty sure that is against the FRCP and
simple common sense.

:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoSheep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-18-09 01:16 AM
Response to Original message
77. I can only hope that feral ass-hat implodes.
Edited on Fri Sep-18-09 01:17 AM by NoSheep
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hosnon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-18-09 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
79. Wow - the best part is when she accuses Judge Land of treason:
Edited on Fri Sep-18-09 10:42 AM by Hosnon
"Plaintiff submits that to advocate a breach of constitutional oaths to uphold the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic, is in fact a very practical form of 'adhering' to those enemies, foreign and domestic, and thus is tantamount to treason, as Defined in Article III, Section 3, even when pronounced in Court. The People of the United States deserve better service and loyalty from the most powerful, and only life-tenured, officers of their government."

On a lighter note, how pretentious to spell "judice" with an "i"...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-18-09 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
82. Rhodes appears to have had some second thoughts about her involvement with Taitz.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
namahage Donating Member (678 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-19-09 12:43 AM
Response to Original message
83. Where's the "Columus Division"? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Oct 25th 2014, 06:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC