Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Had Bobby not been killed what might have become of the USA

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
greenbriar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-26-09 08:40 PM
Original message
Had Bobby not been killed what might have become of the USA
Truly there would be greatness



Ted took the torch and became the great strong LION he became


how life would have been different
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
muntrv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-26-09 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. Better yet, had John not been killed.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-26-09 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. No Nixon, no Watergate, like the show just pointed out - a whole other world. nt
Edited on Wed Aug-26-09 08:43 PM by polichick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laelth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-26-09 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. This would have been a much, much better country.
Of that I am certain.

:dem:

-Laelth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-26-09 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
4. No death penalty, health care and education a right, corporate money wouldn't equal free speech
Edited on Wed Aug-26-09 09:07 PM by depakid
People underestimate the profound effect that Nixon's 4 quick appointments had on the Supreme Court and the nature of America. Rather than becoming more advanced like Europe, Canada and Australia- the country began to regress toward what one sees in third world nations- a process that continues to this day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-26-09 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Yep, we never really got back on track - and, with Dems mostly Republican lite, when will we?? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-26-09 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
5. The same
Bred from war, embroiled in war, worshippers or war (and private enterprise). Every now and then someone comes to puts a pretty wrapper on the package, but the same old pile of shit that started the ball in motion sits inside, ready to put anyone back who gets out of line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-26-09 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
7. I hate to say this, but I doubt it would have been much different
Bobby was not going to get the nomination in '68 and he would have essentially gone back to the senate. He may have run in '72 but I doubt anyone could have beaten Nixon that year (which makes the whole plumbers fiasco so ludicrous).
Had John lived then it would have been a different story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Awsi Dooger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-26-09 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Agreed, JFK's death was most pivotal
He could have handed off to Bobby in '68, assuming a better situation in Vietnam and ongoing popularity for JFK. Hardly certainties.

The way it unfolded, no Democrat was going to beat Nixon in '72. That incumbent/party in power one term influence is massive.

Had Ted avoided summer '69, the interesting aspect would have been whether he was astute enough to sit out '72. Post Watergate he would have had great opportunity in '76, otherwise I don't see a favorable cycle for him. By '80, after Carter's term, the conservative trend had taken over, at least at the very top.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. "Bobby was not going to get the nominiation in '68"....
...he had just won the Oregon and California primaries. He was leading the delegate count.

What planet were you living on in 1968?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalpragmatist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. No Humphrey still lead the delegate count by a wide margin
There would have been a Humphrey/RFK battle at the convention. Bobby may have won, but it was no sure thing. Daley and some of the other urban machine delegations may have supported Bobby.

Here's a compilation of news coverage at the time: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oMr97_M7okw
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rebubula Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Actually...
..He lost Oregon and Humphrey was still a very formidable opponent with alot of deep pocket business allies.

RFK was killed by big business interests in order to prevent his ascending. The Deputy Director of the FBI (Clyde Tolson) is quoted as saying, 'I hope that someone shoots and kills that son of a bitch'.

There has been and always will be a very powerful cabal that works behind the scenes in all countries. John and Bobbie learned that lesson with their lives.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Back in '68 the vast majority of the delegates were selected in the
smoky backroom. Humphrey pretty much had the nomination tied up with the old line pols. Remember an administration in power has lots of favors to call in when it comes to nomination time.
Our process is vastly different now than it was in '68. So while Kennedy had roled up some nice wins, the old guard resisted him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalpragmatist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. Agree somewhat
Presidents are not all-powerful. I have no doubt that things would have been different and better, but the question is how different.

We might have had universal, single-payer health care. And we may have had different welfare policies from the time. In terms of foreign policy, we'd have withdrawn from Vietnam much sooner. Without Vietnam spending, perhaps monetary policies in the '70s would have been more sane and we'd have been spared some of the problems with stagflation. On environmental policies, we probably wouldn't have gotten anything markedly different from what Nixon pushed. A more liberal Supreme Court in the '70s would have perhaps kept Brown v. Board of Education from being made toothless, with perhaps more equal education funding and more heavily desegregated schools today.

But that being said, we would likely still have gone through the '73 oil shock and the '70s would probably still have been economically stagnant. There would likely still have been significant racial tensions, and conflicts over busing. My guess is that the property tax revolts of the late '70s would still have occurred. And RFK himself may have tacked somewhat rightward on issues like spending and welfare. Remember too that RFK would not have had the kind of influence in Congress that LBJ did in '64-'66, and he would have likely had smaller majorities and an emboldened conservative minority in Congress.

Moreover, it's unlikely that Democrats would have held the White House through all those years. RFK may have won in '68 and may have won a second term, but in 1976, the trends would probably have favored a Republican victory, and a Reagan presidency may still have occurred. There is a pendulum effect in politics, and a reaction against the liberalism of the '60s and early '70s would likely still have resulted.

So we likely still would have entered a period of Republican dominance, and America would probably not be a social-democratic paradise. But at best, we'd have universal health care (no sure thing, though), and we'd perhaps be a somewhat less unequal society, with thousands of extra people alive today who otherwise died in Vietnam. But we'd still have problems, we'd still probably have gone through a large anti-tax phase, and the Republicans would probably still have dominated the 1980s. At best, the reaction against the '60s and '70s would have been more like the '50s reaction against the New Deal - consolidating what had been done rather than dismantling what came before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
invictus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
12. We should have made the Kennedys America's royal family. With 3 King Kennedys in a row, America
Edited on Thu Aug-27-09 01:48 PM by invictus
would be perfect.
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidneyCarton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
15. We can believe hope for a better world...
but this is the one we got.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
16. It's absolutely not certain that he would have beaten Nixon
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC