Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Baucus proposed Medicare-style public option last November

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-17-09 01:15 PM
Original message
Baucus proposed Medicare-style public option last November

Baucus proposed Medicare-style public option last November

by Jed Lewison

What happened to Max Baucus?

Today, he's the biggest thing standing between us and a public option, but on November 12, 2008 he released a 35,000-word, 98-page health care proposal that included a public option.

Quoting from the Baucus proposal (pp. 26 and 27):

The Baucus plan envisions that the Health Insurance Exchange would offer a new opportunity for individuals and small businesses to easily compare private coverage options and a public plan and to purchase the policy that would work best for them.

The Exchange would also include a new public plan option, similar to Medicare. This option would abide by the same rules as private insurance plans participating in the Exchange (e.g., offer the same levels of benefits and set the premiums the same way). Rates paid to health care providers by this option would be determined by balancing the goals of increasing competition and ensuring access for patients to high-quality health care. A number of options could be considered to determine who runs the plan, who is eligible for it, and how to ensure that the public-private insurance competition lowers costs and improves quality. The Independent Health Coverage Council, described below, would inform these decisions.

Federal funds would be needed to start up the Exchange, but it would be self-sustaining within a few years.

The Baucus plan also contained a provision which would have allowed Americans to purchase Medicare if they were between the ages of 55 and 64 and didn't have access to the Exchange.

So less than twelve months ago Max Baucus was promoting the idea of a public plan option within a national Health Insurance Exchange.

Today, his committee is the only thing slowing it down.

What gives? Who got to Max Baucus?

There's a story here, and it's probably very interesting.

This was Baucus trying to catch the media's attention before any other Dem. He basically revealed the Dem's plan so he could be viewed as leading the push for reform.

He was hoping to upstage the HELP committee, but he failed. He was hoping that his bill would be the dominant bill so that he could do exactly what he's trying to do now sellout the Democrats on the public option.

One thing is certain, all Baucus' arguments against the public option are BS. Baucus = Fail.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-17-09 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. We gave his masters what they wanted so quick and easily
Edited on Mon Aug-17-09 01:25 PM by kenny blankenship
that they decided they wanted MORE.

That's what happened. That's what always happens when you send a conciliator in to do a gladiator's job.

They got what they wanted when we unilaterally dropped Single Payer in exchange for nothing. They could pop the champagne and lay out their celebratory lines of coke right then. Since that moment onward, they've just been seeing how high they can run up the score...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kirby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-17-09 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. See this link...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-17-09 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. Ah Ha!
Kinda makes you want to kick almost all their asses out of Congress cuz ya know it's not just Max.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-17-09 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. Give him credit
Edited on Mon Aug-17-09 01:24 PM by DJ13
That proposal served its purpose as blackmail to secure increased bribes for his campaign fund from the health care idustry.

Aint our system great?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-17-09 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
4. he's a tool
I don't think any of us debate that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-17-09 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
5. NICE FIND Prosense! Gives me more confidence that Obama is Rope-A-Doping reThugs into being against.
...something the general public wants and decrease their numbers more and more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Soylent Brice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-17-09 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
6. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-17-09 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
7. Baucus had great liberal values last year but they were made of glass.
One push from an insurance company lobbyist and they shattered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-17-09 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
8. According to Dean much of what's happening is "politics" ie an attempt
to get the bill through the Senate. Ultimately the bill will pass with a public option through reconciliation.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036789/vp/32445707#32445707
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-17-09 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. We'll see. Baucus needs to be called out on this. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeOverFear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-17-09 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
9. Well lookie here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hieronymus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-17-09 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
11. Vote out the" blue dogs" in your district. They bring down the Democratic
Party ... just republican lite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrat2thecore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-17-09 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
12. Bought and paid for. -nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC