denem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-20-09 10:35 AM
Original message |
| Obama's first six months: Compare and contrast with 1993. |
|
Edited on Mon Jul-20-09 10:48 AM by denem
My take, the old and the 'new' hands learnt the lessons of 'The Hunting of The President'. The ''Party of No' and their MSM allies came as no Surprise.
|
bluestateguy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-20-09 10:41 AM
Response to Original message |
| 1. Clinton's first 6 months were a nightmare |
|
and corporate media/conservatives constantly reminding us that Clinton didn't clear 50% of the vote.
Obama took that talking point away from them.
|
WI_DEM
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-20-09 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 2. it's interesting that the media did that to Clinton, who still clearly won the election of '92, with |
|
Bush he didn't even win the popular vote and some in the media were claiming he had a mandate! and how wonderful it was that he was governing like a man who won by a landslide.
|
denem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-20-09 12:05 PM
Response to Original message |
goclark
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-20-09 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
| 5. I'll take ~ he has done a marvelous job |
|
trying his best to mop up the mess from Bush.
|
scheming daemons
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-20-09 12:07 PM
Response to Original message |
| 4. You're absolutely right. Obama's first 6 months have been 10 times as productive as Clinton's |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed May 22nd 2013, 12:22 AM
Response to Original message |