Botany
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Jul-14-09 08:46 PM
Original message |
| Did Fox just cut off half the screen on Obama's pitch on purpose? |
 |
They must have 30 cameras there and they can't show Obama's pitch crossing the plate?
I might be nuts but that was no accident.
|

Yup. Murdoch orders. That was straight bullshit |
Thrill |
Jul-14-09 08:47 PM |
#1 |
 
Me either. Usual angle is behind and to the right of the pitcher. |
SeattleGirl |
Jul-14-09 08:49 PM |
#3 |

It's hard to imagine how anyone would think that would be a USEFUL angle... |
BlooInBloo |
Jul-14-09 08:48 PM |
#2 |
 
The most important part is seeing where it crosses the plate |
Botany |
Jul-14-09 08:50 PM |
#6 |

Talk about ridiculous conspiracy theories |
MadBadger |
Jul-14-09 08:49 PM |
#4 |
 
T.V. has been covering baseball from 1947 ..... |
Botany |
Jul-14-09 08:51 PM |
#8 |
 
Its ridiculous yes, but the FOX director is either a novice or a dumbass |
Uzybone |
Jul-14-09 08:51 PM |
#9 |
  
KO might have some enlightenment |
Cha |
Jul-14-09 09:00 PM |
#18 |
 
Oh yeah? |
Cha |
Jul-14-09 08:57 PM |
#17 |
  
Oh yeah. DUers automatically think that anytime any branch of Fox "wrongs" them its a conspiracy |
MadBadger |
Jul-14-09 09:03 PM |
#20 |
 
They reported it on CBS |
Cha |
Jul-14-09 09:04 PM |
#21 |
  
Do you have a quote from CBS Radio? |
MadBadger |
Jul-14-09 09:08 PM |
#25 |
 
No, it's not Fox news, but I think it's still owned by Murdoch. |
SeattleGirl |
Jul-14-09 09:06 PM |
#23 |
 
He does, but that doesnt mean he exerts his influence on those branches |
MadBadger |
Jul-14-09 09:07 PM |
#24 |
 
You're likely right, but did you watch it? |
BlooInBloo |
Jul-14-09 09:18 PM |
#29 |

Yeah, and if anything, Fox Sports looked like a bunch of amateurs. |
MadBadger |
Jul-14-09 09:21 PM |
#30 |

Ok. |
BlooInBloo |
Jul-14-09 09:23 PM |
#31 |

Apparently it was a good pitch. |
AllieB |
Jul-14-09 08:49 PM |
#5 |
 
some Boos dues to White Sox jacket in a NL park |
krawhitham |
Jul-14-09 08:54 PM |
#12 |
  
That's how I saw it too |
senseandsensibility |
Jul-14-09 08:57 PM |
#15 |
  
Exactly..my |
Cha |
Jul-14-09 09:17 PM |
#27 |
  
That is what I thought too. There is no way to know how many were Republicans and how many were |
Pirate Smile |
Jul-14-09 09:18 PM |
#28 |
 
little short of the plate, would have been a ball |
Thothmes |
Jul-15-09 06:25 AM |
#32 |

Agreed. They seemed fixated on showing him from ground up. |
ellisonz |
Jul-14-09 08:50 PM |
#7 |

It was a great pitch, right across the plate. |
Avalux |
Jul-14-09 08:52 PM |
#10 |

It's already on CBS Radio that Fox deliberately did not show his pitch |
ruggerson |
Jul-14-09 08:53 PM |
#11 |
 
That seemed planned to me. |
Thrill |
Jul-14-09 08:56 PM |
#13 |

Here's YouTube with better angle |
Stephanie |
Jul-14-09 08:56 PM |
#14 |
 
Thanks. Its not a better angle, just a wider TV |
Uzybone |
Jul-14-09 09:00 PM |
#19 |

Wider TV really doesn't explain it. I don't have a wide screen, |
SeattleGirl |
Jul-14-09 09:08 PM |
#26 |

I was waiting for the (R) |
wantoutnow |
Jul-14-09 08:57 PM |
#16 |

Of course they did. Are you surprised? nt |
Jakes Progress |
Jul-14-09 09:06 PM |
#22 |

If so, they did him a favor. |
Balbus |
Jul-15-09 09:21 AM |
#33 |

One, they showed it later |
PVnRT |
Jul-15-09 09:28 AM |
#34 |
Thrill
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Jul-14-09 08:47 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. Yup. Murdoch orders. That was straight bullshit |
SeattleGirl
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Jul-14-09 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 3. Me either. Usual angle is behind and to the right of the pitcher. |
 |
That way, you can see the pitch AND the catch.
That was bullshit.
Guess it could have been worse, though. They could have showed only the catch, and not the pitch.
|
BlooInBloo
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Jul-14-09 08:48 PM
Response to Original message |
| 2. It's hard to imagine how anyone would think that would be a USEFUL angle... |
 |
for what everybody was interested in on that particular pitch.
|
Botany
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Jul-14-09 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
| 6. The most important part is seeing where it crosses the plate |
MadBadger
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Jul-14-09 08:49 PM
Response to Original message |
| 4. Talk about ridiculous conspiracy theories |
 |
Sometimes a bad camera angle is just a bad camera angle
|
Botany
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Jul-14-09 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
| 8. T.V. has been covering baseball from 1947 ..... |
 |
Edited on Tue Jul-14-09 08:53 PM by Botany
.... I think they know where to get the shot from. Like from behind the pitcher to the catcher not from the side of the pitcher with a hand held camera.
|
Uzybone
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Jul-14-09 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
| 9. Its ridiculous yes, but the FOX director is either a novice or a dumbass |
 |
a sports director knows the essence of the broadcast is to see the action. Which means they should have followed the pitch.
|
Cha
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Jul-14-09 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
| 18. KO might have some enlightenment |
Cha
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Jul-14-09 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
 |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Tue Jul-14-09 08:53 PM Response to Original message 11. It's already on CBS Radio that Fox deliberately did not show his pitch.
Either that or they're dangerously incompetant.
|
MadBadger
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Jul-14-09 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
| 20. Oh yeah. DUers automatically think that anytime any branch of Fox "wrongs" them its a conspiracy |
 |
Not all Fox's are the same. Fox News is not the same as Fox TV, Fox Sports, etc. But some DUers just dont get that.
|
Cha
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Jul-14-09 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
| 21. They reported it on CBS |
MadBadger
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Jul-14-09 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #21 |
| 25. Do you have a quote from CBS Radio? |
SeattleGirl
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Jul-14-09 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
| 23. No, it's not Fox news, but I think it's still owned by Murdoch. |
MadBadger
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Jul-14-09 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #23 |
| 24. He does, but that doesnt mean he exerts his influence on those branches |
 |
Otherwise Fox TV would have failed years ago.
|
BlooInBloo
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Jul-14-09 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
| 29. You're likely right, but did you watch it? |
MadBadger
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Jul-14-09 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #29 |
| 30. Yeah, and if anything, Fox Sports looked like a bunch of amateurs. |
BlooInBloo
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Jul-14-09 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #30 |
AllieB
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Jul-14-09 08:49 PM
Response to Original message |
| 5. Apparently it was a good pitch. |
 |
Did you hear some of the boos? People were overwhelmingly cheering though. It wasn't like when Cheney went to Yankee Stadium.
|
krawhitham
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Jul-14-09 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
| 12. some Boos dues to White Sox jacket in a NL park |
senseandsensibility
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Jul-14-09 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
| 15. That's how I saw it too |
Cha
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Jul-14-09 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
 |
thought..not that there wouldn't be any die hard repukes there.
|
Pirate Smile
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Jul-14-09 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
| 28. That is what I thought too. There is no way to know how many were Republicans and how many were |
Thothmes
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Jul-15-09 06:25 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
| 32. little short of the plate, would have been a ball |
ellisonz
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Jul-14-09 08:50 PM
Response to Original message |
| 7. Agreed. They seemed fixated on showing him from ground up. |
Avalux
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Jul-14-09 08:52 PM
Response to Original message |
| 10. It was a great pitch, right across the plate. |
 |
Of course Fox didn't want a good shot of it. It'll be out there on highlights, youtube tho.
|
ruggerson
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Jul-14-09 08:53 PM
Response to Original message |
| 11. It's already on CBS Radio that Fox deliberately did not show his pitch |
Thrill
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Jul-14-09 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
| 13. That seemed planned to me. |
Stephanie
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Jul-14-09 08:56 PM
Response to Original message |
| 14. Here's YouTube with better angle |
Uzybone
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Jul-14-09 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
| 19. Thanks. Its not a better angle, just a wider TV |
 |
Edited on Tue Jul-14-09 09:19 PM by Uzybone
but yeah...it was a no doubter of a pitch. Smack into Pujols glove.
|
SeattleGirl
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Jul-14-09 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #19 |
| 26. Wider TV really doesn't explain it. I don't have a wide screen, |
 |
and normally, I see both the pitch and the catch in baseball games.
|
wantoutnow
(148 posts)
|
Tue Jul-14-09 08:57 PM
Response to Original message |
| 16. I was waiting for the (R) |
 |
after his name being put up by fox. Maybe if he would have thrown a bad pitch they would have.
|
Jakes Progress
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Jul-14-09 09:06 PM
Response to Original message |
| 22. Of course they did. Are you surprised? nt |
Balbus
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Jul-15-09 09:21 AM
Response to Original message |
| 33. If so, they did him a favor. |
PVnRT
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Jul-15-09 09:28 AM
Response to Original message |
| 34. One, they showed it later |
 |
while he was in the booth, from the more traditional over-the-shoulder view you see during the broadcast. The pitch bounced a couple of inches before the plate, as, frankly, most first pitches do (it looks short on the TV, but step onto a major league diamond sometime - it's a hell of a lot longer from the mound to the plate).
It could simply be they were declining to show the end of the pitch so as to avoid showing it bounce.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Feb 09th 2010, 08:51 PM
Response to Original message |