Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

AU Urges Senate Judiciary Committee to Ascertain Sotomayor's Views on Church-State Sep

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
and-justice-for-all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-09-09 04:11 PM
Original message
AU Urges Senate Judiciary Committee to Ascertain Sotomayor's Views on Church-State Sep
July 9, 2009

Supreme Court Nominee’s Religious Liberty Decisions Are Few, Watchdog Group’s Report Says

Americans United for Separation of Church and State today reiterated its call for the Senate Judiciary Committee to question Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor on issues relating to religious liberty and church-state separation.

The committee is scheduled to begin hearings on Sotomayor on Monday. In advance of that, Americans United has released a report listing Sotomayor’s rulings on church-state issues.

“Sotomayor’s church-state rulings are few in number,” said the Rev. Barry W. Lynn, executive director of Americans United. “We need more information, and we’re relying on the Judiciary Committee to get it.”

AU’s examination of Sotomayor’s record found rulings in areas such as prisoners’ religious liberty rights, the display of religious symbols on public property and teacher-led prayer in public schools.

More: http://www.au.org/media/press-releases/archives/2009/07/au-urges-senate-judiciary.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-09-09 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. With the rise of the religious right,
I think it is important to view a judicial nominee's record on church/state separation.

I disagree with the sign at the bottom of your post, but defend your right to say it, and to be free of religion if that is what you desire. I state this only to show that even one who disagrees with you on that point can agree with you on the main point, that justices must remember and respect the First Amendment and keep religion out of government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC