Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What's the hold-up in Minnesota - tell us who won!!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-22-09 09:24 AM
Original message
What's the hold-up in Minnesota - tell us who won!!!
Seriously, you already charged Coleman $95k and the tidbits we got from the court case showed you weren't really buying Coleman's complaint.

My only guess is perhaps Coleman/Pawlenty are negotiating with team Franken to find a way to end this mess with the republicans and especially Coleman & Pawlenty, saving face.

Coleman right now is political dirt who probably couldn't run for dog catcher of some po-dunk Minnesotan remote village and Pawlenty wants to seem presidential to the right-wing nut jobs. So I would guess they want to find a way to end this with them looking like 'winners' even if Franken wins (which he should).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Wapsie B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-22-09 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. I still say that Franken's term needs to be 6 years from the day he is seated.
This Coleman challenge is a farce. Nice dirty tricks ploy by the gop to deny Obama one more Democrat in the Senate but this needs to end. And the gop needs to be penalized for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-22-09 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I agree but Franken needs to take the high road
He's going to head in there with a very low approval rating. I would suspect that in some ways Franken is going to work with Coleman to help him save face because it will show that Franken is not a vindictive person (even if Coleman was).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-22-09 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #2
16. He'll be in a great position to highlight the corruption that kept him out...
...and which robbed Minnesota of half their US Senate representation for months. That's the framing that needs to be hit again and again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old Codger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-22-09 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
3. Mostly
The idea that coleman could not win an election should be mostly correct, in most places that would be true, but you are talking about a place that has re-elected Bachman, she is absolutely batshit crazy and the manage to elect her, I don't think they would have too much trouble accepting ole normy again, next to her he seems normal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-22-09 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. But Bachman lives in a district that favors her getting re-elected
you can't compare that to a state-wide race where the nut-jobs get to vote in the same election as the people who know how to think!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-22-09 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
4. they're still trying to figure out how to give it to Coleman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-22-09 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
5. I am sticking with my prediction that Franken will never be seated
If Harry Reid wasn't such a sniveling appeaser, this would have been taken care of months ago. As is stands, the GOP now realizes that no one will ever make them obey the law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mz Pip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-22-09 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. I certainly believe that the GOP will
drag this out for as long as possible and that will include taking this to the SCOTUS. Coleman will file an appeal at the very last minute to make sure that the case won't even be heard until next year.

THat's how they operate.

Now why the people of MN aren't expressing outrage over this is another story. Don't they care that they only have one senator?

Mz Pip
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-22-09 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. they should have rioted some time in December
Now it is way too late. And no, most of them don't care, as long as their TV turns on every night. Most probably couldn't tell you how many Senators they're supposed to have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lindisfarne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-22-09 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. Minnesotans do care -but they also believe in the rule of law. The courts have been
Edited on Mon Jun-22-09 10:59 AM by lindisfarne
very good at examining the issues thoroughly and fairly. Unfortunately, MN law is written so that this can happen.

Pawlenty has announced he won't run for another term which means he may refuse to sign the election certificate if the case is appealed to the SC. We'll see - he also has presidential ambitions so he may decide that would be too costly.

Pawlenty is a very atypical MN republican. Historically, while MN republicans have had different ideas on fiscal issues than the DFL, they have been highly intelligent folks who understood the folly of cutting social programs like schools and even health care programs.

I heard a MN Public Radio program about a year ago which had on both Carlson and Quie (both Repubs; Quie was governor in 1980s; Carlson - 1990s). I didn't at first realize who was talking and started paying closer attention when it struck me that very intelligent, well-informed, and well-thought-out comments were being made (more intelligent than some Democratic politicians these days). Although there are many areas to disagree with them philosophically, one could not say that these Republicans had not seriously thought about the issues and the impact of their decisions on the people of the state.

Education takes up a huge percentage of any state's budget, and until about 15 years ago, MN really upheld education. Ventura & Pawlenty have done a lot of damage (although it did begin a bit with Carlson).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-22-09 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
8. The longer they "wait" to seat franken the better it is for the Thugs


They have planned it this way. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpartanDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-22-09 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
10. There is no hold up this isn't an episode of Law and Order
Where things are wrapped up in neat little package after an hour even in case where it is evident that the court is favoring one side.


Former Minnesota Supreme Court Justice Jim Gilbert told MPR's Morning Edition he's not surprised by the delay, but expects the judges will issue their ruling by July 4.

"I thought it would take them between 30 and 60 days to do the final opinion," Gilbert said.

On June 1, the date of the hearing, the justices all met immediately afterward in conference, and that's the date that they voted their preference.

"But then the real writing process starts after that," he said. "To draft the opinion and to circulate that and to make sure all the research is done correctly. So it does take a little time."

http://minnesota.publicradio.org/display/web/2009/06/15/gilbert_franken_coleman/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-22-09 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
11. This is truly nuts.
Soon there will be children born who were conceived after the election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-22-09 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
13. One of Franken's attorneys was just on Stephanie Miller. He says they
are cautiously optimistic, which doesn't say much, but they think it will be resolved this week. I know crumbs, but this is where the situation stands. There are storm clouds from the RW in the Senate who have threatened to go to the US Supreme Court to prevent him from being seated, but the lawyer feels it won't go anywhere because the election was legal in every way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pool Hall Ace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-22-09 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
14. I was looking for an anti-Norm Coleman bumper sticker on Cafe Press.
Not easy to find at all. Plenty of anti-Franken, however, including one that says, "'Thou shall not steal' applies to jackass moron's like yourself too!" And yes, I kept the Freeper punctuation in there.

I've never been to the state, but I don't understand what's going on in Minnesota at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-22-09 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
15. This is horribly slow, but it won't compare to how slowly the process of
appealing to the US SC will move. They can appeal over whether or not Pawlenty can be forced to sign certification, or Coleman can appeal over the final decision in MN. Even if the US SC rejects it, it will be many months just to get to that point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hutzpa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-22-09 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
17. There are two things at play here;
Edited on Mon Jun-22-09 11:31 AM by Hutzpa
1) The Democrats in Minnesota have run out of idea and could not figure a way to out smart
the Republicans.

2) They (Democrats in Senate and Minnesotan) are not convinced Al will play ball once he gets
in the Senate, they (Senate Dems-most of them anyways) are some what working with the Republicans
in using this as a way to slow Obama down, knowing fully once Al takes his seat, Obama gets his
overwhelming majority, which is not good.

That said I don't see any reasonable reason as to why Senate Dems could not throw up force in putting
pressure on the Minnesotan Courts to end this charade.

It reminds me of 2000 when Bush stole the election and the Democrats relied heavily on Warren Christoper to challenge the courts and he caved in.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC