SuperTrouper
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-19-09 12:40 PM
Original message |
| Young Iranians to the Ayatollah Khamenei: Bring it On! |
|
I have been following the Iranian election news on Twitter and their links and I have been surprised by the defiance of the young Iranians after Ayatollah Khamenei's edict to stop the protests. They are very defiant and this has been confirmed by Richard Engel on MSNBC. It looks like the protesters are unfazed by the Ayatollah and plan to protest tomorrow in huge numbers. I do hope that Mousavi has the fortitude to support them and not to run and hide. I hope that Ayatollah Rafsanjani also supports the Iranians who dream of being free from the repressive theocracy. If you read a little bit of Iran's history you will find that this defiance is not unprecedented: There were protests in 1906, 1909 and 1925 against the last three Qajar Shas: Mozaffar al-Din Shah Qajar, Mohammad Ali Shah Qajar, and Ahmad Shah Qajar, which ended up toppling each of them and also in 1941 and 1979 against the two Pahlavi Shahs: Reza Shah and Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, which also caused their downfall, the latter bringing the Islamic revolution that put in power the exiled Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini.
Fast-forward to 2009, the people of Iran are restless again and want to be free. This is the most dangerous challenge to the rule of the Mullahs, but this time they cannot demonize our American President or the Western world because the blame rests squarely on the shoulders of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Ayatollah Khamenei and the repressive regime that they lead. So I send many prayers to the courageous Iranian people so that they can achieve their dreams and objectives in search of freedom..and I hope that if there is a showdown in the streets of Tehran, our government sends signals of support for the Iranian people. President Obama has been doing the right thing in staying on the margins of this event (even if the careless and warmongering GOP has been attacking him and accusing him of being weak), but if there is an escalation of such magnitude that there is a violent crackdown against the protesters, then we as Americans should do every thing possible to support them diplomatically.
|
MADem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-19-09 12:49 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. They are less defiant so much as fed up. Picture Bush-Gore on steroids. |
|
Edited on Fri Jun-19-09 12:49 PM by MADem
The reason Bush got away with it is because he cheated within the margin of error. If the confidential ministry memo is true, Khameini's boy Ahmadi came in THIRD. They have had enough and are not afraid.
I will say this. I expect bloodshed and death. I know that the protesters expect that as well. A cycle of mourning demonstrations is what brought down Shah thirty years ago, and it looks like this is what will happen this time. Expect a lot of women to be hurt, as well, because sometimes, the women will walk in front so that the "enforcers" (in this era, the baseeji and police, and anyone who has been imported to do the dirty work) will have to hit them to get to the men.
The culture understands and knows how to exploit martyrdom better than most.
If you are on Twitter, change your settings to Teheran--that way the cretins in the government cannot figure out where you are at, and you serve to hide those who are still transmitting.
|
SuperTrouper
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-19-09 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 3. Thank you for the advice. That's why I love DU, a wealth of info and great people. Thanks! nt |
grannie4peace
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-19-09 12:53 PM
Response to Original message |
| 2. thanks for posting ,this place sucks for info |
Aloha Spirit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-19-09 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
bdamomma
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-19-09 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
| 5. Huffington Post was ok, BBC website is also good. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue May 21st 2013, 02:00 AM
Response to Original message |