Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Question re Same Sex Partner Benefits

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
nolabear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 03:52 PM
Original message
Question re Same Sex Partner Benefits
At the risk of sounding like a maroon, there's something I don't understand about the same sex partner benefits for federal employees. If same sex marriage isn't recognized (and it should be), and civil unions aren't universally recognized, then what does "partner" actually mean? Is there an equivalent for non-married heterosexual partners? Are there qualifiers?

I really do want to know so if you guys want to argue would you wait a few posts and help me out here first?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Democratic discussion forum
   Replies to this thread
  - I tried to get my live-in b/f of six years on my health plan...  JuniperLea   Jun-17-09 03:55 PM   #1 
  - wouldn't that qualify as common law?  Neecy   Jun-17-09 04:05 PM   #6 
     - CA doesn't have that anymore...  JuniperLea   Jun-17-09 04:08 PM   #8 
        - that is weird  Neecy   Jun-17-09 04:09 PM   #9 
           - I have no idea... it was done quietly...  JuniperLea   Jun-17-09 04:18 PM   #10 
  - Not sure myself  Aloha Spirit   Jun-17-09 03:57 PM   #2 
  - In the State Department there now is.  Beacool   Jun-17-09 03:58 PM   # 
  - In the UK, "partner" is used for heterosexual couples...  Deja Q   Jun-17-09 03:58 PM   #3 
  - Some employers do cover opposite sex domestic  REACTIVATED IN CT   Jun-17-09 03:59 PM   #4 
  - Sharing bank accounts and household expenses; holding property together; ...  GodlessBiker   Jun-17-09 04:03 PM   #5 
  - Let's hope that the benefits are called "domestic partner benefits."  damntexdem   Jun-17-09 04:08 PM   #7 
  - So it is sticky. Thanks. And I agree. Marriage all around!  nolabear   Jun-17-09 06:11 PM   #11 
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. I tried to get my live-in b/f of six years on my health plan...
Edited on Wed Jun-17-09 03:56 PM by JuniperLea
And found out that he would have been eligible if we were lesbian lovers, but since he's a man, we have the "option" of getting married.

No, no we don't. It's not an option. I don't want that option in my life. Been there...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neecy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. wouldn't that qualify as common law?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. CA doesn't have that anymore...
Weird, huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neecy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. that is weird
The rules for common law were strict enough that you wouldn't think there would have been abuse of the system. When did they get rid of it, and why?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I have no idea... it was done quietly...
My sister found out after living with the father of two of her children for over 7 years, and assuming it was in place.

Common Law Marriage is not recognized in the state of California.
Learn what it is and where it's recognized.

What's Below:
If my partner and I live together long enough, won't we have a common law marriage?
Which states recognize common law marriage?
If my partner and I live together long enough, won't we have a common law marriage?
Contrary to popular belief, even if two people live together for a certain number of years, if they don't intend to be married and present themselves to others as a married couple, there is no common law marriage. More particularly, a common law marriage can occur only when:

a heterosexual couple lives together in a state that recognizes common law marriages
for a significant period of time (not defined in any state)
holding themselves out as a married couple -- typically this means using the same last name, referring to the other as "my husband" or "my wife" and filing a joint tax return, and
intending to be married.
Unless all four are true, there is no common law marriage. When a common law marriage exists, the couple must go through a formal divorce to end the relationship.

http://www.cadivorceonline.com/calpages/Alimony/commonl...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aloha Spirit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. Not sure myself
But for example in Massachusetts many employers granted healthcare benefits to gay partners, I think the requirements were pretty loose. You can't be married to anybody else, you can't be related, financial interdependence....
Then when gay marriage was legalized a lot of those companies discontinued partner benefits unless the couple got married.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 03:58 PM
Original message
In the State Department there now is.
They circumvented DOMA by including all live-in couples, regardless of the gender of the partners. They first do have to prove that they have been living together for a year (bills, joint accounts, etc.).

I'm not sure about the other Departments.

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. In the UK, "partner" is used for heterosexual couples...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
REACTIVATED IN CT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
4. Some employers do cover opposite sex domestic
partners. Most have an affidavit/certification process you have to go through.

Here's an article on the topic

http://www.salary.com/benefits/layouthtmls/bnfl_display...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GodlessBiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
5. Sharing bank accounts and household expenses; holding property together; ...
holding yourself out as partners; living together, length of the relationship. There is usually an affidavit to fill out. Stuff like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
7. Let's hope that the benefits are called "domestic partner benefits."
That at least gives some sense of there being a common household.

Of course, further inequality would then reside in the fact that married partners would get benefits even if living in separate households.

And, of course, the best approach is to recognize same-sex marriage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nolabear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
11. So it is sticky. Thanks. And I agree. Marriage all around!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 24th 2013, 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC