Something struck me.

[cooolandrew]

Yes people don't like Pelosi that's fine but there must be an objective to why they went after Pelosi. Now folks would like to see DK replace her if it came to that most likely wouldn't happen but it appears to me that if they are after her of the moderate Democrats she must be the one most likely to at least hold them to some account. They're after her for a reason and usually what the GOP want it's for underhand reasons, so putting aside the whole impeachment thing. I think she needs our support as it's likely she's the best path to a least some accountbility, maybe not to the level we'd like but at least something. Pelosi has pushed through quite a few constructive bills in recent times replacing her would most likely, to my guess and Democrats always taking the easy option would in the end leave us with 2 Reids running congress we can't go there.

[leftstreet]

1. What? n/t

[cooolandrew]

2. I believe it's the ramblings of a mad man, aka me. :o n/t

[leftstreet]

3. LOL

Okay, but who on earth wants DK to replace Pelosi?

[Flabbergasted]

4. She took impeachment off the table early on in 2006 remember.

Whether the decision was right or wrong she is hardly a bastion of accountability.

They went after her imo because she is an easy, profitable and public target as well as a relatively weak leader.

[monmouth]

5. Repugs are the owners of criminal and corrupt. When you hear these

two words, we automatically think Republicant. Anyone anywhere with a D behind their name is fair game for them, they want a Dem to be corrupt and criminal to get the light off of them. Be it Nancy or any other high profile Dem will be good enough for them. It's not the person necessarily, it's the criminal attachment they can hook them up with.

[amborin]

6. people hate dems from california