Drunken Irishman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-02-09 04:29 PM
Original message |
| You know who we should draft to run for president in 2012? |
|
Edited on Sat May-02-09 04:52 PM by Drunken Irishman
Michele Bachman.
Screw Sarah Palin and Bobby Jindal. Buh-bye Mitt Romney and Newt Gingrich.
Bachman is the real candidate the Republicans should run in 2012.
Could you imagine the debate between her and Obama?
Oh please, Lord, make this happen!
50-state landslide?
Largest margin of victory in modern presidential history?
I know many of you who lived through the landslides of '72 and '84 are just itching for something similar with Obama. Nixon and Reagan took us out to the woodshed and embarrassed us and I know none of you are over that. We were pantsed nationally and I so would love to not only pants the Republicans in 2012, but force them down the Walk of Shame.
C'mon, who's with me?!?
|
| Jackpine Radical
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-02-09 04:34 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. '76? Carter's election? |
|
Or do you mean Nixon v. McGovern, '72?
|
| Drunken Irishman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-02-09 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 3. You're right, I meant 72. |
| ruggerson
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-02-09 04:38 PM
Response to Original message |
| 2. '76 was hardly a landslide |
| Drunken Irishman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-02-09 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
| 4. Obviously I meant 72, since Nixon didn't run against Carter. |
| wellstone dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-02-09 05:35 PM
Response to Original message |
| 5. Great idea! Particularly since |
|
it would also get her out of office in Minnesota.
|
| nevergiveup
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-02-09 05:50 PM
Response to Original message |
| 6. It would be a landslide |
|
but Bachman would still carry much of the South and also Wyoming, Idaho and Utah.
|
| Brazenly Liberal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-02-09 06:12 PM
Response to Original message |
| 7. The only problem I see is that I might have to vote for her |
|
How could anyone resist the four year freak show she'd bring to Washington?
Disclaimer: I will not - under any circumstances whatsoever - vote for a Republican in 2012, 2016 or any other election year I live long enough to see.
|
| Thothmes
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-02-09 07:05 PM
Response to Original message |
| 8. SOS H. Clinton will run in 2012. |
| Drunken Irishman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-02-09 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
| 9. So you don't expect Obama to run for re-election? |
| Thothmes
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-02-09 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
| 10. He will definately run for reelection |
|
SOS Clinton will run against him in the primaries.
|
| Arkana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-02-09 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
| 11. There is more chance of Hillary being struck by lightning than this happening. |
| Drunken Irishman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-02-09 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
| 12. That's about as likely as Sarah Palin saying something intelligent. |
| phleshdef
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-02-09 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
| 13. LOL. Stop being a shit stirrer. |
| BlooInBloo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-02-09 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
| 14. (shrug) Then she'll lose again. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)     |
Wed Jun 19th 2013, 07:26 AM
Response to Original message |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
Replies to this thread
-
-