Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

See How the RW Is Foaming at the Mouth Against Clark re: Abortion

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
DoveTurnedHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-04 02:56 PM
Original message
See How the RW Is Foaming at the Mouth Against Clark re: Abortion
Edited on Thu Jan-08-04 02:57 PM by DoveTurnedHawk
Wesley Clark Backs Abortion Until Birth, Won't Pick Pro-Life Judges

In an interview with the Manchester Union Leader newspaper on Tuesday, Wesley Clark finally divulged his extreme pro-abortion views. Clark said he would never appoint pro-life judges and that he supported keeping abortion legal until the day of birth.

Clark told the New Hampshire newspaper that he would never appoint a pro-life judge to any federal court because the appointee wouldn't be able to follow the precedent of Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court decision that legalized abortion on demand.

Clark flashed his extreme pro-abortion credentials by saying that, "until the moment of birth, the government has no right to influence a mother's decision on whether to have an abortion," the paper reported.

"Life begins with the mother's decision," Clark said.

<...>

http://www.lifenews.com/nat268.html

I absolutely love how the RW "Life News" is so frenzied against Clark. It shows how scared the RW is of him.

It's all music to my ears, General. :-)

DTH
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
adamrsilva Donating Member (636 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-04 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. That might actually be *too* pro-choice for the general public
Most American are pro-choice, but many of them favor the cut-off point at the third trimester, or the "point of viability."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoveTurnedHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-04 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. LOL
So much for "fighting for Democratic values," eh Adam?

General Clark is a man of principle, not expedient views that change based on the wind.

DTH
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adamrsilva Donating Member (636 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-04 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I wasn't questioning anyone's values
But most of the public supported the partial-birth abortion ban. However uninformed, that kind of abortion is becoming undefensible in a lot of people's eyes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-04 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. You support Dean right?
I am willing to put my money that he believes this too. After all, this is not a bad thing indeed. Most of the public according to polls supported the war, that dont make it right. After all, I read a profile of your guy and testimonals, saying that he doesnt let the polls guide his decisions. I wish my candiate had a more pro choice background, its a shame but I forgive him. Now here are my views on abortion, keep it legal and safe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfartinthewoods Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-04 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. 26% support always legal
http://www.pollingreport.com/abortion.htm

this is a primary position...don't worry, he'll start talkin to God like dean has and that will change in time for the GE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-04 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. Go Wes!
love that he's not afraid of pissing off a bunch of rightwingers. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovedems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-04 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
5. Life begins with the mothers decision
I LOVE IT!!!! He has just re-empowered many women with those 5 little words. That is great. Thanks Wes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeff in Cincinnati Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-04 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
6. It isn't just abortion
This is from CNN.com (forgot the link)

"If Karl Rove is watching today, Karl, I want you to hear me loud and clear: I am going to provide tax cuts to ease the burdens for 31 million American families -- and lift hundreds of thousands of children out of poverty -- by raising the taxes on 0.1 percent of families -- those who make more than $1,000,000 a year. You don't have to read my lips, I'm saying it," Clark said.

To paraphrase what was once said about U.S. Grant, "General Clark don't scare worth a damn!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-04 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Clark will need the help of Congress to do that
Edited on Thu Jan-08-04 03:20 PM by bowens43
and with this tone and a Republican congress it isn't bloody likely. Clark is apparently doing everything he can to piss off those he will need the most if he expects to do any of the things he has promised.He speaks like a pissed off general, like a drunken cowboy. He really should try to get some understanding of how our political system works. Clark can NOT do any of these things without congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfartinthewoods Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-04 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #12
23. he understands that all he has to do it talk tuff
and the lefties will drool. it doesn't matter if he means it or if he has a snowflake's chance in hell of delivering on this stuff.

they just want to hear him say it and the hell with what that means in the general election.

four more years
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Screaming Lord Byron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-04 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
7. You can't accuse Wes of sitting on the fence on this one.
Well done, General.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buffler Donating Member (325 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-04 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
9. Clark lost me
Clark flashed his extreme pro-abortion credentials by saying that, "until the moment of birth, the government has no right to influence a mother's decision on whether to have an abortion," the paper reported.

There is no way I could ever support a candidate with this position.

Woman is in labor, the head is crowning and Clark supports her having the ability to tell the doctor "I changed my mind, abort it please". That is an indefensible position and one that I could never support.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adamrsilva Donating Member (636 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-04 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. I think that's what many will feel
as I was saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-04 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Edit
Edited on Thu Jan-08-04 03:21 PM by dralston
Original post edited. Investigation under way. Sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buffler Donating Member (325 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-04 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. If the quote
is made up from whole cloth I will retract my statement. What about you if the quote is accurate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoveTurnedHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-04 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. First, If the Head Is Crowning, That's Effectively Birth
Edited on Thu Jan-08-04 03:24 PM by DoveTurnedHawk
Second, no doctor would abort at that point, particularly based on the words of a patient who is probably in great pain and heavily medicated to boot. Clark's point is that the GOVERNMENT should not decide.

Third, it's probably just a metaphor, but hey, if you can't support Clark because of this, I'm sorry to hear it but I understand. You can't please everyone all of the time.

DTH
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buffler Donating Member (325 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-04 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. Not really
First, If the Head Is Crowning, That's Effectively Birth

Birth is often defined in legal terms as "complete seperation".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-04 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #9
24. Clark never said that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-04 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
15. We better got some direct quotes.
I don't trust "life news."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-04 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Here's the original
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-04 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. It's not even the same article.
It sounds like Clark got soundbited. I wonder what the context is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoveTurnedHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-04 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. So It's Not a Direct Quote From Clark at All
It's a paraphrase of a general position by the newspaper.

DTH
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-04 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Further twisted by lifenews
into "until the day of birth". He didn't said that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bicentennial_baby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-04 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
18. Edited
Edited on Thu Jan-08-04 03:36 PM by bicentennial_baby
The actual Clark quote:

"Regarding his own views on abortion, Clark said, “I’m not going to get into a discussion of when life begins. I’m in favor of choice, period. Pure and simple.

“I don’t think you should get the law involved in abortion,” he said. “It’s between a woman, her doctor, her faith and her family and her conscience. You don’t put the law in there.”

big difference from the above article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 04:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC