Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Over The Past 30 Years, How Would You Rank The Presidents From Most Progressive to Least?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Median Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 08:43 PM
Original message
Over The Past 30 Years, How Would You Rank The Presidents From Most Progressive to Least?
Edited on Mon Mar-30-09 08:44 PM by Median Democrat
Here is my ranking:

1. President Barack Obama (2009 - present)
2. Jimmy Carter (1977-1980)
3. Bill Clinton (1993-2000)
4. George H.W. Bush (1989-1992)
5. Ronald Reagan (1981-1988)
6. George W. Bush (2001-2008)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. That's about right, I think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. On a scale ranging from-5 for totally reactionary to 5 for highly progressive:
1. President Barack Obama (2009 - present) jury's out, but hoping for maybe a 2
2. Jimmy Carter (1977-1980) +1
3. Bill Clinton (1993-2000) -1
4. George H.W. Bush (1989-1992) -4
5. Ronald Reagan (1981-1988) -5
6. George W. Bush (2001-2008) -100 (like, completely off the scale. Like trying to rank a wolverine in the county fair 4-H cattle show.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Smarmie Doofus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. I'd flip Carter and Clinton.
Edited on Mon Mar-30-09 09:09 PM by Smarmie Doofus
And it's too early to tell about President Transformational.

The rest is correct. Not much difference really between Reagan and Bush II in terms of ideology. Bush was definitely the more objectionable of the two... as he lacked both charm and intelligence. Reagan did not lack charm and was kind of clever, though I wouldn't say intelligent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Median Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. I Rank Dubya As Less Progressive Than Reagan, Because ...
Reagan had to deal with a Democratic congress, and did raise taxes a bit in response to concerns about the deficit, even though he tried to call some of these hikes "fees." Bush, on the other hand, Dubya and his neocon cohorts were pretty much unopposed, which helped lead to the current foreign policy and economic crisis. As for Carter and Clinton, I agree it is a tough call. I do think that Bill Clinton was generally a free marketer, and his reliance on Dick Morris always troubled me. Finally, while I understand that Obama is a work in progress, what's your take based on what you've seen? Obama's first 100 days alone goes far beyond what Bill Clinton and Jimmy Carter did in terms of pushing liberal imperatives in terms of the stimulus, health care reform, and financial regulation, rather than deregulation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. My observation:
1. Center-right (jury still out)
2. Center-right
3. Center-right
4. Center-right
5. Right
6. Flat out wingnut
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
5. Don't know about Obama yet.
I agree with your ranking otherwise...although it's close. Reaganomics makes my skin crawl.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fovea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
6. Where's Richard Nixon?
Edited on Mon Mar-30-09 09:17 PM by Fovea
Wage and Price controls.
Diplomatic overtures to China and S.U.
Founding the Environmental Protection Agency.


Take it Back to 1969, and he would be pretty progressive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Median Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Did Not Include Nixon Because...
Edited on Mon Mar-30-09 09:31 PM by Median Democrat
I wasn't even born when he was President, though you are correct that he does fall within the thirty year window I referenced. Based on what I've heard, I'd put him between Bush I and Clinton, though his politics and "Southern Strategy" appear to have been a precursor of Rove.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Umbral Donating Member (969 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. More progressive initiatives were signed by Nixon than any by all the presidents since. nt
Edited on Mon Mar-30-09 10:49 PM by Umbral
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Secret war in Cambodia, illegal wiretapping and intimidating civil rights and anti-war groups...
Edited on Mon Mar-30-09 10:21 PM by Hippo_Tron
Escalation of Vietnam even though he knew it was un-winnable, not to mention aiding the installation of a murderous dictator in Chile. Nixon was not progressive by any stretch of the imagination unless you completely ignore foreign policy. IMO foreign policy is almost a better indicator of how progressive a President is because it doesn't really have to go through Congress and even when there are treaties, you can measure it by whether the President signed a certain treaty even if the Senate did not ratify.

Clinton didn't send thousands more troops to die in an un-winnable war and he didn't install any dictators in Latin America and he didn't secretly bomb any countries that would subsequently de-stabilize them and lead to a genocide. He did sign Kyoto Protocol, The ICC, and the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, all of which were never ratified due to Jesse Helms and the most right wing congress since the Hoover Administration. Meanwhile Nixon had one of the most progressive congresses of the 20th century. I really don't see where people get this idea that Nixon was more progressive than Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Nixon was one of the most progressive Presidents we've ever had on domestic issues
Edited on Mon Mar-30-09 10:38 PM by brentspeak
His foreign polices and dirty tricks prevents him from being considered a "progressive", but his domestic policies puts Clinton and Carter -- and, if things keep going the way they are, Obama -- to shame. It wasn't the Democratic Congress that indexed Social Security for inflation, created the EPA and OSHA, began a policy of affirmative action, and wanted to introduce a national health care system and minimum national wage. Clinton, for all his socially liberal statements, was a total Wall St. and corporate America enabler.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. It was the Democratic Congress that did all of those things
Edited on Mon Mar-30-09 10:53 PM by Hippo_Tron
Nixon just signed them. Carter is far more progressive than him due to reversing our decades long support of the Shah and Somoza. You undervalue foreign policy in your assessments far too much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Yeah, Nixon signed the bills into law...
...after he proposed the legislation in the first place:

http://tvnews.vanderbilt.edu/program.pl?ID=205547

(And the EPA was created by http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reorganization_Plan_No._3">Nixon's executive order.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Fair enough, still don't see how it makes him more progressive than Carter
Edited on Mon Mar-30-09 11:16 PM by Hippo_Tron
Bobby Kennedy, Gene McCarthy, or Hubert Humphrey all would've done those things and probably more. Public opinion wanted more regulation at that point and that's what Nixon did. Carter tried to get progressive legislation passed and congress wouldn't pass it because Carter wanted to cut their precious pork barrel projects. He also tried to get the nation off of our oil addiction and created the Department of Energy, which I would argue is just as important as the EPA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
7. I'll do it for the entire post-war period.
Edited on Mon Mar-30-09 09:20 PM by Odin2005
Liberal
1. LBJ (in spite of Vietnam)
2. Truman
3. Obama
4. Carter
5. JFK (Vastly overrated)
Moderate
6. Eisenhower
7. Clinton
Conservative
8. Nixon
9. GHW Bush
10. Ford
Bat-Shit Wing-Nut
11. Reagan
12 GW Bush
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spag68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
10. Obama
is a centrist, not a progressive. We haven't had a progressive since Johnson, and he was only a progressive for a short time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Median Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. How would you rank them?
Or, is your view that there is no such thing as more or less progressive?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Nixon was a progressive on domestic issues
Probably one of the most progressive Presidents on domestic issues we've ever had, strangely enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. And terrible on foreign policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
14. This board has turned me off progressivism and made me embrace the term Liberal much more.
Everything is so god damned exclusive to the "progressives" on DU. Everybody seems to have a different definition for it and it seems that many here have such a rigid definition that if somebody doesnnt fit, they are a centrist, or a corporatist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. Why the knock against the term liberal I wonder? Did Repukes scare us off of it?
I am proud to be a LIBERAL.

The rankings:

1. Obama is obvious
2. Clinton
3. Carter
4. Bush 1
5. Reagan
6. Dumbya thanks to Cheney

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Median Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 02:02 AM
Response to Reply #14
22. You know, I Agree. I Should Have Used "Liberal"
My ranking would remain the same with the term "liberal."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raineyb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #14
27. Thanks for the gratuitous swipe.
That makes for great conversation.

Regards
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 02:04 AM
Response to Original message
23. slight variation
Carter
Obama
Clinton
BushI
raygun
BushII


of course, "most progressive" is a complete non sequitur when applied to this list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 02:07 AM
Response to Original message
24. Where is LBJ and the Great Society that halved poverty - on your lists?
Where is JFK?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Median Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #24
26. Because They Weren't President In Last 30 Years
And I was not even born when they were President, so I am reluctant to rank them with no personal knowledge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 03:10 AM
Response to Original message
25. Hate to nitpick, but George W. Bush has no place on that list.
He was never President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
28. No love for Gerald Ford
The first vice/president to never be elected by the people to either position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC