Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Next Time a Republican Tells You That The Private Sector Does a Better Job at Charity

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-09 05:43 PM
Original message
The Next Time a Republican Tells You That The Private Sector Does a Better Job at Charity
Ask them how the private sector can stash away cash that is meant for soldiers in need.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29331853

FORT BLISS, Texas - As soldiers stream home from Iraq and Afghanistan, the biggest charity inside the U.S. military has been stockpiling tens of millions of dollars meant to help put returning fighters back on their feet, an Associated Press investigation shows.

Between 2003 and 2007 — as many military families dealt with long war deployments and increased numbers of home foreclosures — Army Emergency Relief grew into a $345 million behemoth. During those years, the charity packed away $117 million into its own reserves while spending just $64 million on direct aid, according to an AP analysis of its tax records.

Tax-exempt and legally separate from the military, AER projects a facade of independence but really operates under close Army control. The massive nonprofit — funded predominantly by troops — allows superiors to squeeze soldiers for contributions; forces struggling soldiers to repay loans — sometimes delaying transfers and promotions; and too often violates its own rules by rewarding donors, such as giving free passes from physical training, the AP found.

Founded in 1942, AER eases cash emergencies of active-duty soldiers and retirees and provides college scholarships for their families. Its emergency aid covers mortgage payments and food, car repairs, medical bills, travel to family funerals, and the like.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-09 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. Malfeasance on the part of "the biggest charity inside the U.S. military"
Edited on Sun Feb-22-09 07:03 PM by Occam Bandage
is not very good evidence for the claim that the private sector handles money better than the government. I mean, yeah, it's technically private, but that article gives the impression of an private organization that's entirely wrapped up in the government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaker bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-09 07:17 AM
Response to Original message
2. Charity is a private sector function
Charity is in essence voluntary. Taxation and spending is not charitable because it is not voluntary, however it is simply far more effective.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-09 07:44 AM
Response to Original message
3. Republicans long for the return of Dickensian times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-09 07:49 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. And actively work to bring them about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
santamargarita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-09 08:16 AM
Response to Original message
5. Republicans are not allowed to tell me anything!
:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-09 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
6. I'm sure someone appointed or recommended by * is behind this
Edited on Mon Feb-23-09 09:00 AM by AllentownJake
It fits their standard operating procedures, bully the lower people on the food chain for money for "their aid" and than deny the aid when they need it. I'm also sure there is probably some high ranking * friend who embezzled or collected management fees on the money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northernlights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-09 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
7. and btw how is poppy's infamous points of light foundation doing?
last I recall, it featured bloated executive salaries to FOPs, and one of the worst track records of percentage actually going to need...

haven't seen anything about it in many, many years now...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC