Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Guantánamo Meets Geneva Rules, Study Finds."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 03:49 PM
Original message
"Guantánamo Meets Geneva Rules, Study Finds."


Guantánamo Meets Geneva Rules, Study Finds



Article Tools Sponsored By
By WILLIAM GLABERSON
Published: February 20, 2009

A Pentagon report requested by President Obama on the conditions at the Guantánamo Bay detention center concludes that the prison complies with the humanitarian requirements of the Geneva conventions, but it makes many recommendations for increasing human contact among the prisoners, according to two government officials who have read portions of it.


A report requested by President Obama determined that the detention facility at Guantánamo Bay meets the humanitarian standards of the Geneva Conventions.

The review, requested by President Obama on the second day of his administration, is due to be delivered to the White House this weekend.

The request, made as part of a plan to close the center within a year, was widely seen as an effort by the new administration to defuse the power of allegations during the Bush administration that there were widespread abuses at Guantánamo, and that many detainees were suffering severe psychological effects after years of isolation.

(...)

Gitanjali Gutierrez, a lawyer for Guantánamo detainees at the Center for Constitutional Rights, said that she and other lawyers found that conditions have remained bleak there even after the start of the new administration.


read more of her comments: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/21/us/21gitmo.html?hp


In other news..



White House Site Un-Slams Bush on Katrina

by Paul Kiel, ProPublica - February 20, 2009 2:30 pm EST

Direct criticism of the Bush Administration's handling of Hurricane Katrina was deleted from whitehouse.gov

ChangeTracker, our vigilant and all-seeing widget, is barely a day old, and already it’s netted a revealing tweak to the White House Web site.

If you’d dialed up the "Additional Issues" portion of the Web site’s "Agenda" section earlier this week, the entry on Hurricane Katrina would have left you with zero doubt about who was to blame for the governmental failure to respond to the storm: the Bush administration. "President Obama will keep the broken promises made by President Bush to rebuild New Orleans and the Gulf Coast," the section read, continuing:

"President Obama swiftly responded to Hurricane Katrina. Citing the Bush Administration's ‘unconscionable ineptitude’ in responding to Hurricane Katrina
, then-Senator Obama introduced legislation requiring disaster planners to take into account the specific needs of low-income hurricane victims." (Emphasis mine.)



see the old language and new language and more: http://www.propublica.org/article/white-house-site-un-slams-bush-on-katrina

Why the sanitizing so as to not offend George and Dick too much these days? What's wrong with calling things what they are?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. If Obama hasn't seen that report yet, does this article ask us to slam him
for it anyway? What's happening here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. It points sharply to a behind the scenes struggle
between a Pentagon, some of which still want to keep the whitewash, and those rights advocates who will be coming out with their own report next week.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. Who conducted the investigation? A military team?
Wouldn't a group that oversees the Geneva Convention be better qualified?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 06:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC