|
|
|
This topic is archived. |
| Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
|
| babylonsister
|
Wed Jan-21-09 06:46 PM Original message |
| OBama retakes oath of office at the WH to make it really legit. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| |
| LakeSamish706
|
Wed Jan-21-09 06:47 PM Response to Original message |
| 1. Hahaha... Thats incredible, wonder who administered it? n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| babylonsister
|
Wed Jan-21-09 06:48 PM Response to Reply #1 |
| 3. Good question-I'm sure we'll find out. Maybe Judge Roberts, again? nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ronnykmarshall
|
Wed Jan-21-09 07:13 PM Response to Reply #3 |
| 24. Roberts did. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| babylonsister
|
Wed Jan-21-09 08:26 PM Response to Reply #24 |
| 26. Thanks-I heard he wore his here-come-the-judge robes, too. So |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Cha
|
Wed Jan-21-09 07:06 PM Response to Reply #1 |
| 21. That's my question and exactly what |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| RichGirl
|
Wed Jan-21-09 08:53 PM Response to Reply #21 |
| 33. I know just a little of what you are talking about.... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| merh
|
Wed Jan-21-09 08:32 PM Response to Reply #1 |
| 29. Roberts did |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Uzybone
|
Wed Jan-21-09 06:47 PM Response to Original message |
| 2. LOL. Thank you John Roberts, you dumbfuck |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| babylonsister
|
Wed Jan-21-09 06:48 PM Response to Reply #2 |
| 5. And now no one else can either. Brilliant! nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| tridim
|
Wed Jan-21-09 06:48 PM Response to Original message |
| 4. Freepers: If you take the oath twice they cancel each other out. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| babylonsister
|
Wed Jan-21-09 06:49 PM Response to Reply #4 |
| 7. Ha! That wouldn't surprise me. I hope he taped it! nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| LakeSamish706
|
Wed Jan-21-09 06:49 PM Response to Reply #4 |
| 8. Damn, don't put that in their heads, they will probably run with it. n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Ken Burch
|
Wed Jan-21-09 08:30 PM Response to Reply #4 |
| 28. Then again, they couldn't make that argument without admitting that the first oath counted. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| tridim
|
Wed Jan-21-09 08:33 PM Response to Reply #28 |
| 30. Good point |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| RichGirl
|
Wed Jan-21-09 08:55 PM Response to Reply #4 |
| 35. We need a troll in there and tell them that Obama is sworn in for TWO TERMS! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Graybeard
|
Wed Jan-21-09 06:48 PM Response to Original message |
| 6. Can we "do over" the confirmation of Roberts? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| LakeSamish706
|
Wed Jan-21-09 06:50 PM Response to Reply #6 |
| 12. Wouldn't that be great, and do Alito while were at it. n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Ken Burch
|
Wed Jan-21-09 08:52 PM Response to Reply #6 |
| 32. Somebody check the tape of Roberts' swearing in. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Sebastian Doyle
|
Wed Jan-21-09 08:55 PM Response to Reply #6 |
| 34. If Roberts fucked up his own oath when HE took it..... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| greguganus
|
Wed Jan-21-09 06:49 PM Response to Original message |
| 9. Smart move, Mr. President. n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| polichick
|
Wed Jan-21-09 07:08 PM Response to Reply #9 |
| 23. Definitely! I wouldn't put anything past the people who stole 2000 & 2004. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| EFerrari
|
Wed Jan-21-09 06:50 PM Response to Original message |
| 10. The freep supreme couldn't even administer an oath. What a disgrace to his country. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| calimary
|
Wed Jan-21-09 06:59 PM Response to Reply #10 |
| 17. No kidding. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Patsy Stone
|
Wed Jan-21-09 06:50 PM Response to Original message |
| 11. What a maroon. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| MoonRiver
|
Wed Jan-21-09 06:51 PM Response to Original message |
| 13. Unbelievable! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| babylonsister
|
Wed Jan-21-09 06:52 PM Response to Reply #13 |
| 14. No, I think he just messed up. I can't imagine he'd try to intentionally flub |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| MoonRiver
|
Wed Jan-21-09 06:57 PM Response to Reply #14 |
| 16. I'd like to think that. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| WeDidIt
|
Wed Jan-21-09 06:52 PM Response to Original message |
| 15. IT WAS A FRAUDULENT RE-TAKING OF THE OATH! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Graybeard
|
Wed Jan-21-09 07:01 PM Response to Original message |
| 18. Does Obama have to watch that parade again? And the Balls? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| IndianaGreen
|
Wed Jan-21-09 07:01 PM Response to Original message |
| 19. But, but, Rush and his ditto heads were going to pounce on this for weeks on end! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| babylonsister
|
Wed Jan-21-09 07:02 PM Response to Reply #19 |
| 20. That's the beauty of this. Now they can't bitch. nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| IndianaGreen
|
Wed Jan-21-09 07:06 PM Response to Reply #20 |
| 22. Roberts is part of the birth certificate conspiracy! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| BrotherBuzz
|
Wed Jan-21-09 07:14 PM Response to Original message |
| 25. Preemptive President |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| BlooInBloo
|
Wed Jan-21-09 08:28 PM Response to Original message |
| 27. Sigh. Giving in to idiots only has one effect... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Cha
|
Wed Jan-21-09 08:38 PM Response to Reply #27 |
| 31. I have a different take on this.. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Clio the Leo
|
Wed Jan-21-09 09:35 PM Response to Original message |
| 36. So that means he'll say it THREE TIMES!!!!! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu May 23rd 2013, 11:54 AM Response to Original message |
| Advertisements [?] |
| Top |
| Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC