Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

AP: Obama Retakes Oath of Office

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Cash_thatswhatiwant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-09 07:46 PM
Original message
AP: Obama Retakes Oath of Office
on msnbc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-09 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. hmm, how lame
Has that happened before?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hope And Change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-09 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yes it has.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hieronymus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-09 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Who has before?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hope And Change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-09 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. President Arthur 1881-1885
Assumption of office

President Arthur took the oath of office twice. The first time was just past midnight at his Lexington Avenue residence on September 20 by New York Supreme Court justice John R. Brady; the second time was upon his return to Washington two days later.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chester_A._Arthur
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hope And Change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-09 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Here`s more info...
The article notes that both Calvin Coolidge and Chester Arthur took the oath twice. But both men were vice president at the time and Arthur, who was sworn in immediately, decided on a formal swearing in when he got back to Washington.

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2009/01/some_experts_think_obama_shoul.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-09 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Prolly not;
never 'necessary.'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-09 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
4. Who administered it this
time?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sohndrsmith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-09 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
7. Well, I found an article on this in the Houston Chronicle online, and it
says it's an AP story, but I can't find it on either the AP or Reuters site...

well, hopefully he did so we can move on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hope And Change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-09 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. It`s confirmed...
Statement from White House on Re-Administering Oath of Office


The following is a statement from White House Counsel Greg Craig.

"We believe that the oath of office was administered effectively and that the President was sworn in appropriately yesterday. But the oath appears in the Constitution itself. And out of an abundance of caution, because there was one word out of sequence, Chief Justice Roberts administered the oath a second time."


http://thepage.time.com/statement-from-white-house-on-re-administering-oath-of-office/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC