firedupdem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-20-09 11:55 PM
Original message |
|
Edited on Wed Jan-21-09 12:16 AM by firedupdem
|
| democrattotheend
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-20-09 11:58 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. That'll probably be gone soon |
|
It was probably copied from the campaign site, and will probably be revised soon. I don't think partisan language like that is considered appropriate for a government-funded website, and it might even violate some rules. I am all for shots at Bush but I think presidents generally avoid taking direct shots at their predecessors and I also don't think the White House website is an appropriate place for partisan shots like that.
|
| Lasher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-21-09 12:41 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 4. "presidents generally avoid taking direct shots at their predecessors" |
|
I doubt Jimmy Carter would agree.
|
| FrenchieCat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-21-09 12:00 AM
Response to Original message |
| 2. Politico is getting desperate. |
|
If there's nothing to argue about, they are gonna be in trouble.
They don't "get" yet that they should just cover policies without making shit up.
|
| firedupdem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-21-09 12:16 AM
Response to Original message |
|
I should have known that was from change.gov Sipping wine and sleepy....oops
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)     |
Fri May 24th 2013, 03:40 PM
Response to Original message |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
Replies to this thread
-
That'll probably be gone soon
-
"presidents generally avoid taking direct shots at their predecessors"