Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Could This Be The Reason Diane Feinstein is Pissed With Obama????

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Hutzpa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 10:43 PM
Original message
Could This Be The Reason Diane Feinstein is Pissed With Obama????
Looks like Ms Feinstein is upset because Obama went over her head to choose
Panetta, is she concerned about the $600 million and $3.1billion contract
respectively hubby is enjoying under Bush'co for the next 8years?

Mr Feinstein got a sweetheart deal with the Army worth almost $3.1billion for the
next 8years.


I'm loving this Panetta pick every single day.


GOBAMA!!!

heres is an article about these sweetheart deals....


http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2003/04/22/MN310531.DTL


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. Jeez, it was enough that she failed in her oversight job - this is disgusting!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gblady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. you are right....
this is disgusting!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hutzpa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Absofuckinlutely
she needs to vacate the intelligence committee she is serving on, and we
wonder why there are so many wars going on all at the same time???

This is despicable in the highest order.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-09 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
23. she didn't fail. She very carefully
steered these things to her hubby's company and other well connected bastards. The rest is just collateral damage and her picks would help her "keep a lid" on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NRaleighLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. The opportunities for disgust are so numerous every day. I think that
our country is broken beyond repair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1776Forever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
4. This is one appointment I can back wholeheartedly!
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cottonseed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
5. Three thousand million dollars.
I shake my head at the amount of money associated with politicians families these days. CA should have dumped Feinstein years ago -- especially after her gang fear monger and 3 strikes garbage. Good on Obama with this Panetta pick. I was around the guy a bit while in Monterey and he at least comes off as a genuine guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-09 12:43 AM
Response to Reply #5
14. The Democratic party machine will back DiFi all the way. You can't replace her unless you
vote republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
6. I wonder if Obama is trying to introduce Feinstein to obscurity
If so, I'm all for it. Just because she was a friend of Harvey Milk doesn't excuse her support for torture and illegal wiretapping. Her record on Second Amendment issues needs no further embellishment here, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hutzpa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. If her claim to fame is her
relationship to Milk then Cali voters need to check their head,
time for a change.

They must have decent replacement out there in California I
presume.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pink-o Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-09 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #6
19. Yeah. and she had no problem exploiting Milk's death and parlaying her own career
Di Fi was the head of the SF supes when Milk and Moscone were killed 30 years ago. She immediately became the mayor without an election. (albeit, she was elected as mayor after that). Believe me, the gay community in SF feels her betrayal more than anyone: she was heavy-handed and ignorant all thru the AIDS crisis 20 years ago, she used her office as mayor to go on a zillion tax-funded junkets to get SF a bunch of "sister cities" and we've always known her husband, Richard Blum, was a big defense contractor. Why she kept getting elected, and furthering her career? Her opponents were even worse than she was!

Ironically, one of her first opponents for the Senate seat was Michael Huffington: a Repub and ex-husband of our dah-ling Arianna. Yes, Arianna was a good Republican wife; we had nothing but derision for her back then. But after he lost the election to DiFi, Michael Huffington came out of the closet, divorced Arianna and she turned into a flaming Pinko librul.

So at least something good has come out of this! As for Di herself, I hope she realises she's being punished for supporting torture and the chipping away of FISA. I'm so f'in sick of these DINOs! At least we have Boxer and Speier (who's a Baby Boxer, I have great faith in her!), maybe we can finally replace Dianne with a real democrat!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClayZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
8. Yeah! K and R
I hope she gets what's coming to her for not BLOWING THE WHISTLE on bu$h!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
10. And this..
"Broom The CIA"

<snip>

"Clearly, Feinstein and company don't have legitimate objections to Panetta, which makes the appointment of a liberal former US Representative - Time magazine notes that, in Congress, Panetta "repeatedly voted against President Ronald Reagan's military initiatives" - all the more attractive. They are merely scrambling to cover their own asses and cover up their own involvement in actions that, if ever exposed, would become the war crimes of two centuries.

The Panetta appointment also explains a lot about Obama's establishmentarian choices for Secretaries of Defense and State. He picked his battles, and it may be that Panetta is being sent in with a broom to sweep out the dirtiest, smelliest, most illegal enterprise in the United States government (one that has had a corrupting influence on Defense and State, too).

And if Feinstein et al really do try to head it off at the pass and deny Panetta's nomination, all the new president has to do is gather up some of the documents about illegal activities at the CIA - Drugs, anyone? Attempted coups? Illegal domestic surveillance? - in recent years that will be newly available to him on January 20, leak those documents to the press, cause a storm of controversy (and some Pulitzer Prizes to boot), have the new Senate Foreign Relations Committee chair, Senator Kerry, call for public hearings (reminiscent of his Iran-Contra and BCCI investigations), and, voila, place Feinstein and friends - and those who are behind them in this - in checkmate."



<much more>
http://narcosphere.narconews.com/thefield/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hutzpa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Gotto love our new Prez
:wow:

no smoke without fire....and it's coming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Doctor. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-09 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
12. This is why I love Democrats.
They cross-check each-other. It's the fundamental point of political veracity.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-09 12:11 AM
Response to Original message
13. Always follow the money.
It's how we're losing our freedom and wealth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tishaLA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-09 01:46 AM
Response to Original message
15. The has to pay the mortgage on her $16 million home
and her war profiteer husband is the best way to make sure that happens.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ForeignSpectator Donating Member (970 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-09 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #15
22. THAT ugly brick costs $16 million?!
War profiteer AND bad taste? Phew....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firedupdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-09 01:48 AM
Response to Original message
16. I find out more and more on this woman everyday. She's a real
piece of work!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
invictus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-09 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
17. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-09 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
18. It shows she's not too smart also k*r GREAT Post
Lets say you're a greedy politician who uses politics to enhance the personal gains of your family and the rest of the ruling class. How smart is it to mouth off to the guy who has a great deal of influence on that income stream, embarrass the guy in public? Not very! It got you thinking and you came up with this gem. Now others will think about it and look in to it. No telling what they'll find.

Feinstein's Freudian slips are showing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-09 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
20. No conflict of interest there.
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-09 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
21. URS is a partner company with Bechtel in the nuclear disposal business
See, www.washingtonclosure.com/News/WCH_Newsletter4/Vol_04_Issue_09.pdf

URS merged in 2007 with the Washington Group to form an $11 billion nuclear construction and engineering giant. See, http://www.forbes.com/markets/2007/05/29/urs-washington-closer-markets-equity-cx_jl_0529markets28.html

If it glows in the dark, DiFi gets a piece of the action.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-09 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
24. WOW. WOW. WOW. K&R.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-09 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
25. K&R She should be worried, if and when
they actually start prosecuting and sending people to prison. She could be among them?:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-09 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
26. She's rumored to be thinking about running for governor here in Calif.
Ugh. I'm willing to take the hit because I want her ass out of the Senate where she wields scary wingnutty power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC