Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Panetta appointment is a strong statement

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 03:02 PM
Original message
The Panetta appointment is a strong statement
I think it clearly says that the Obama administration wants nothing to do with the torture mentality that was so pervasive throughout the bushco ranks and the CIA.
Panetta is strongly opposed to torture and illicit CIA activites.

Here's a Panetta quote:

"If torture can stop the next terrorist attack, the next suicide bomber, then what's wrong with a little waterboarding or electric shock?

The simple answer is the rule of law."

Pretty unequivocal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. People who give concise and simple answers...
Are more trustworthy in general, imho.

This is one thing I've always admired about Obama... cut to the chase, and leave the verbiage at the door.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Style over substance!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TTUBatfan2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. I disagree
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. Bush gave the most concise and simple answers possible.
His statements rarely go beyond a few sentences. Was he trustworthy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. I think you mistake simple...
For simpleton.

Yes, there needs to be a modicum of logic, reason, and sensibility as well. Concise is not a word I'd use to describe the evasive gibberish we've come to recognize as Bush Speak. Concise actually answers the question. Bush Speak leaves you with more questions than you had to begin with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. I don't believe there's a direct correlation between "concise" and "trustworthy"
There are far, far too many issues in this world that defy simple explanations, most of which are matters of foreign policy. One can be as concise as humanly possible and still speak for a half an hour explaining what a reasonable, trustworthy policy would be as it pertains to Iran, for example. In fact, in such instances, brevity is often the enemy of truthfulness, as watering down complex issues leaves out too many important details.

Personally, I don't trust someone that doesn't at least acknowledge the nuances of a situation. That tells me they either think I'm a moron or are clearly under-evaluating the situation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #10
44. grunts and farts may be simple and concise
but are not necessarily the ideal form of communication
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 04:31 PM
Original message
Yes, Obama is concise.
* I will not support a bailout that does not include protections for taxpayers.

* I will not support a FISA bill that includes immunity for Telecoms.

Very strong words.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
23. I am assuming his actions will be equally strong...
Fingers crossed! I keep telling myself there is every indication is it so, but I think the BushCo induced cynicism will hang on for a while.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Still Sensible Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'm concerned...
While I agree with the OP position on the "torture mentality," I would prefer someone at CIA with field experience. I think an outsider could remain an outsider even if he holds the title.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. running the CIA is a managerial position
it's a huge organization and most people with field experience and managerial experience have been part of the status quo. that we don't want.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #9
42. you don't need James Bond to run the CIA, only M
Edited on Tue Jan-06-09 10:23 AM by bambino
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DevonRex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. And insiders like to hide the bodies. I like this pick. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Still Sensible Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. I'm pretty confident that an outsider will never see the bodies
and that you really need to identify someone with some experience in their past. Even someone with oversight experience would be better than a novice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DevonRex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. He'll find some bodies. More importantly he won't allow there to BE
any more torture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. I can finally say, I love this choice of Obama's.
Leon Panetta is one of the good guys in my book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Like Waxman. Operates under the radar. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. Do you like this choice?
Ichingcarpenter (1000+ posts) Mon Jan-05-09 01:31 PM
Original message

Obama's impressive new OLC chief- by Glenn Greenwald

If Glenn likes her then I do too.

The Office of Legal Counsel, inside the Justice Department, is probably the most consequential federal government office that remains relatively obscure. The legal opinions which it issues become, more or less automatically, the official legal position of the Executive Branch. It was from that office that John Yoo, Jay Bybee and others did so much damage, issuing now-infamous memoranda that established the regime of lawlessness that has dominated our political institutions over the last eight years. Other than Attorney General-designate Eric Holder and Obama himself, there is probably no official who will have a more significant role in determining the extent to which the Obama administration really does reverse the lawlessness and legal radicalism of the Bush years.

Today, as The Boston Globe just reported, Barack Obama announced several new appointments to key DOJ posts, including Dawn Johnsen to head the OLC. Johnsen is a Professor of Law at Indiana University, a former OLC official in the Clinton administration (as well as a former ACLU counsel), and a graduate of Yale Law School. She's become a true expert on executive power and, specifically, the role and obligation of the OLC in restricting presidential decisions to their lawful scope.

There are several striking pieces of evidence that suggest this appointment may be Obama's best yet, perhaps by far. Consider, first, this rather emphatic Slate article authored by Johnsen in the wake of the disclosure, last April, of the 81-page John Yoo Memo which declared that the President's power to torture detainees is virtually limitless. Her article is notable at least as much for its tone as for its substance (emphasis added):

>>>>>>snip

http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2009/01/05/olc/i...

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x4770180
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Wow! I missed that. Thanks for the links.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. You're welcome! It's pretty
exciting:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. I like the choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
6. I think he's a good choice. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
8. He has alwasy seemed a sincere person.

That appointment and the Kaine appointment indicate to me that Obama intends to maintain strict control over his administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gmudem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
20. It's good to have an outsider pick.
The CIA is a pretty untrustworthy organization, so it's good to pick someone who has not belonged to it before. Maybe he will be able to change some of the mentality there, but he will probably have to put up with a lot of bs from CIA people who have been there for a while and want to torture and don't want the American public to know what their taxpayer dollars are going to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #20
26. More of the "strong statement"
analysis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rebubula Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
21. CIA Power
The power at the CIA resides in the career people that usually work a couple of steps below the Director. It is a very insular group that does not accept outsiders.

Panetta will do fine, but he will never see the harsher side of the 'Black Budget'.


Political appointees do not have much real power in intelligence agencies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EraOfResponsibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
22. My mother knew Leon Panetta
My mother knew Leon Panetta. He was head of civil rights at Health Education & Welfare (Now Dept. of Education). He was her boss around '69 or '70. He became director of the office for Civil Rights where my mom worked. She said he was outgoing, friendly. He felt very strongly about civil rights (he switched parties from Repub to Democrat because of this). According to her, he was a standup kind of guy, robust, strong, go getter. He wasn't ambitious, but he felt strongly about the cause of civil rights. This is all according to my Mom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seaker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #22
29. My Mom too!
She had/has the same things to say about him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #22
33. That's good to know..
Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
24. Right On, Barack...
A definitive stand against torture makes me quite happy with Panetta...

Rec'd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crimsonblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
25. The opposition to the pick by Feinstein is telling
Feinstein is a worthless enabler, so this pick is AWESOME in my book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
27. Good thing he didn't listen to Feinstein or Reyes?
Both Democratic Chairman in the House and Senate wanted to pretty much keep McConnell and Hayden.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
28. I like it.
Edited on Mon Jan-05-09 08:37 PM by Xap
CIA does indeed need a mindset overhaul in the wake of massive failures on 9/11, WMD, complicity on Iraq, fixing intelligence around policy, torture, analysis based on long-outdated raw data or no data, overall incompetence. Panetta is as good a choice as any to try to salvage it.


Oh yes, somebody remind Feinstein that she is part of the above failures.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTLawGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
30. waaaah
"he's a former clinton guy"!!!!111!!111!!!11

waaaah

"he has no experience"1!1!111!1!11

waaah

"obama has sold out progressives AGAIN"!11!11

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
31. I like this choice.
I think we need someone there with civil rights experience who can keep the pendulum from swinging any more toward totalitarianism. And he's been outspoken against torture. (Though it seems odd that I should have to write that . . . )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MasonJar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
32. Panetta is a great choice. Yea, for the good guys! Torture is over.
DiFi had better not mess this up! I've had it with her after Mukassey. She had better STFU! We all need to call and remind her of her mindless actions on that front and of her need to not mess this up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fearless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
34. Oh noes! Did he pick someone we like now?
Dear me, what am I to do???!?!

:eyes:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. People everywhere must now stick their heads in their toilet bowls to get
the downer felling of yet another disappointment.
Seriously, Panetta will be much better then anyone Diane Feinstein wants so that makes me happy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fearless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 11:42 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. Hehe.
:hurts:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. Well its either that or watch Apocalypse Week on the history channel
and worry incessantly about the fate of the end of the world. I watched it last night and I was boy it was one real downer after another.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fearless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. Yeah! Did you hear about the earthquakes in Yellowstone lately?!?
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. Superearthquakes! We are in the red zone! The end is coming!
or is it supervolcanoes? Well, it won't be pretty, the end. To give the History Channel credit they are pretty much so over the Climate change argument, its happening and its real. But all the other Hopi Indians "Blue Star" crap and the aligning of the galaxy and the sun stuff makes me think I am on pot and back in college circa 1995.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fearless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #39
40. Well if the world ends...
Then the universe aimed real low with the human species and achieved even less.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 07:29 AM
Response to Original message
41. Very good news! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MBS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
43. he used to be my congressman. He's a good guy.
I think this is a good appointment, and, as Andrew Sullivan said on the Daily Dish, the nature of the opposition (eg, bad guys are against it) confirms the wisdom of the choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErinBerin84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
45. lol
Of course, AOL has on the screen "Critics slam Obama CIA pick...even some Democrats complain". Yeah, convenient time for the Democrats to start complaining about this, eh? I think it's a good pick, Feinstein wanted someone very much on the inside and I think we need someone from the outside.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC