Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Should a President who believes that life begins at conception...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 10:27 AM
Original message
Should a President who believes that life begins at conception...
...be at all inclusive of those who support a right to an abortion?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. He Or She Should Be, Sir, But Doubtless Would Not Be
That is the difference between liberals and conservatives, for better or worse....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Nice. So much said in so few words. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. Makes you wonder who will play him in "DU the Movie"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
3. Excellent question. Thank you. nt K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boomerbust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
4. Matt. 5 : 44
Matt. 5:44 But I tell you: Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
5. does Obama believe life begins at conception?


if so, he needs some scientific education.

life begins after delivery when the baby takes the FIRST breath of air and lives to breath another and another. at that point the baby is a live new human. before the first breath of air it is not a live human.

air is the trigger between life and death.

(and said world air is getting dirtier and more polluted by the minute)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
galaxy21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Its viability with me, more than anything else
I think people just say 'life begins at birth' to avoid answering difficult questions.

Someone on here who taught science had a good anology 'life begins at conception, your life begins at 24 weeks.'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. I'm 100% pro choice but I don't buy that.
There is no fixed empirical definition that addresses these matters.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. its pretty fixed. if you don't breath air you don't live


that's pretty fixed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Oh stop. An 8 month old fetus is viable whether it's breathing independently
or not.

Breathing is not the only qualifier of life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. really?!


nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brooklyns_Finest Donating Member (747 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Wow
That is pretty disturbing. I am as pro choice as the next guy, but the idea that life begins when you take your first breath is vile to say the least.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. vile? its reality.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
galaxy21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. I think you want to believe that,
Edited on Sat Dec-20-08 01:16 PM by galaxy21
Because it makes it easier to be pro choice. If its not alive before its born, then there's no problem.


Look, I'm pro choice, but I'll admit that there are moral issues there. The way I reconcile it is: once its reaches viability, it is an independent life form it has rights of its own. Prior to that, it's entirely the mother's decision, and 24 weeks is plenty of time for a woman to make up her mind. And I do find it hard to say that a third trimestor fetus isn't a person.

I think people who believe in no restrictions whatsoever, just refuse to think seriously about the issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sex Pistol Donating Member (257 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Life does begin at conception. Isn't a zygote a living cell?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. So is a sperm, or an ovum.
Edited on Sat Dec-20-08 12:14 PM by MH1
So I guess every month that a woman doesn't conceive, she is "destroying life"!

ETA: and I don't have any idea how you handle all those poor living sperm that don't win the contest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Veteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Every sperm is sacred!
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sex Pistol Donating Member (257 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. That is true, but ovum and sperm cells are haploid cells.
A zygote is a diploid cell, which has two sets of homologous chromosomes as opposed to the one set of chromosomes found in haploid cells. Human beings are comprised of diploid cells; thus, it is a scientific fact that human life beings at conception.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Honeycombe8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. True. The issue really is...when does HUMAN life begin. There's a difference. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #10
21. Then why can't anyone who is pregnant claim the embryo as a dependent on their tax forms?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Honeycombe8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
15. Inclusive in what way? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Celeborn Skywalker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
22. The two positions aren't mutally exclusive.
I am a male and don't like the idea of abortion but I would never presume to tell a woman what she can do with her own body. I don't think my personal opinion should be used to legislate against womens' bodies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. I understand your position
It is one of a number that people can hold. I have mixed feelings about abortion and I fully support a woman's right to choose. But some sincerely take the position that abortion is legalized murder, even if they can understand that those who support abortion do not see it as the taking of a human life.

If someone who has that particular belief system should get elected President, as President of all Americans should he or she be expected to give those who are pro-choice some space in his or her administration when they share agreement on other important matters?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Celeborn Skywalker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. It's hard to say.
I would naturally say, yes, he should give space to pro-choicers but if I were a Republican I'm sure I would feel differently. I'm really not sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Yep, it's kind of the crux of the matter, from a different perspective n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC