Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Do you trust Obama with regard to Supreme Court Justice picks?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 09:32 PM
Original message
Poll question: Do you trust Obama with regard to Supreme Court Justice picks?
Edited on Thu Dec-18-08 09:34 PM by Liberal_in_LA
...or are we going to have to lobby hard to keep Obama from putting someone like George W. Bush on the court? ...in light of the Rick Warren pick?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Neshanic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. Not now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Sucks for you
I'm sorry to hear that he's lost your trust, but that's your problem pal, not his.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Well I'd say absolute trust in any politician
even if his name is Obama is your problem, pal. The smugness of Obama uber supporters is snotty, and degrading. As much as "your side" is tired of the whiners-I'm tired of the Obama is a genius no matter what he does crowd.

CREEPY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 09:44 PM
Original message
same as it ever was...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. I don't have absolute trust in any politician, but I do trust him on the Supreme Court
Read post #6 on this thread

:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neshanic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 09:54 PM
Original message
No I am old and gay. It will suck to be you if he choses badly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
25. If I choses badly then you are correct
But I trust him to make the right decision so I'm not worried.

But you are worried so it must suck to be a worry wart like you.

Too bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neshanic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. Stay off my lawn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lyric Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
26. Wrong. If enough of us lose trust in him, then it DEFINITELY becomes
his problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #26
31. Well I don't think a whole lot of people are going to judge him on who gave his invocation
Edited on Thu Dec-18-08 10:01 PM by Cali_Democrat
I just don't see it as a pressing issue for a lot of people, especially in this economy.

I don't think the issue of Rick Warren is going to come back to bite him. No way.

He will be judged by what happens AFTER he's sworn in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. IF 50% of the GLBT community loses faith in him
Edited on Thu Dec-18-08 10:05 PM by IWantAnyDem
he cannot be re-elected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #34
39. Did you not read what I wrote?
I think most people, including those in the GLBT community, will judge him by HIS OWN policies toward the gay community AFTER he's sworn in.

They won't judge him on who gives his invocation.

Obama is not Rick Warren and he will not govern like Rick Warren.

The poutrage on DU today is friggin hilarious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #39
44. So you say
I don't happen to believe it will happen like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #34
62. Horseshit..... McCain got 27% of the GLBT vote.... another 23% is only a couple million votes
...and he won by 9 million.


Basically... 6% of the population is absolutely batshit crazy upset over this... and 94% is yawning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #31
36. Rick Warren is a harbinger of Obama's treatment of LGBT community
Obama doesn't think that gays and lesbian have the fundamental right to marry one another. That's bigotry, plain and simple!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #36
41. *cough* BULLSHIT *cough*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 02:03 AM
Response to Reply #41
69. Donnie was the harbinger. Kirbyjon the confirmation. Warren the continuation. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. Not now!
I wouldn't be surprised if Obama were to appoint judges from the rightwing Federalist Society.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #13
61. There's some reaching across the aisle. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. I wish skinner would blow DU up....too many of us have gone off the deep end
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kceres Donating Member (839 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. I'm really starting to wonder. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
5. I trust him to give us another Ginsburg or Breyer, but I'd rather another Blackmun or Marshall
However, I'm not actually holding my breath on that one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
6. Wow there are currently 13 ignorant DUers
that have no clue what Obama's stance on the Supreme Court is.


Tuesday, July 17, 2007
Obama on Supreme Court appointments: "We need somebody who's got the heart, the empathy, to recognize what it's like to be a young teenage mom."

"The empathy to understand what it's like to be poor, or African-American, or gay, or disabled, or old. And that's the criteria by which I'm going to be selecting my judges."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. Nice words
What he actually does is what matters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #6
27. Now it's up to 31
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thewiseguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #6
35. I am glad that folks like you are being exposed for what they are during these times
I hate blind supporters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 02:10 AM
Response to Reply #6
74. Why would I believe more claims from my "fierce advocate"?
Talk is cheap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
7. Not any more. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seen the light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
8. Why can't I stop clicking refresh to see the latest results of this poll?
Very interesting, thanks for posting this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #8
21. It's a tie!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaJones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
9. I trust him to select moderates. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uzybone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
11. What Warren pick?
What exactly will Warren be doing in the Obama Admin? How do we go from Warren saying to prayer to questioning Obamas Supreme Court picks? This is insane.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
12. I trusted him to make a much better pick than he did for SOI
and then there was the dreadful choice of Warren so, I guess there's a chance I might be disappointed in his SCJ picks, too. I honestly can't figure out some of his choices, like picking that frigging Salazar for SOI instead of the Raul Grijalva, the man so many people thought was the front runner for the job. Oh well, shows how much I know about who someone will pick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
14. If you liked Clinton's choices, you'll probably like Obama's
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #14
81. that sounds about right
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthCarolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
16. I find it impossible (and naive) to "Trust" any politician nowdays
except for maybe Kucinich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
18. Not any more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chascarrillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. I'll second that.
For so long, I've thought that I could rest easy with Obama as President and trust that he'd put honest-to-god liberals in his cabinet and on the courts. Now, I'm realizing that progressives are going to have to fight tooth and nail to get whatever scraps we can get.

I'm rapidly becoming disenchanted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonnyblitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. I don't trust him for anything. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
20. Not if he's in his "reach across the great divide" mood.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
22. A little less than before he filled his cabinet with Clinton retreads
And the Warren issue.

Im just afraid he wont have enough balls to take on the far right in his nominations to the USSC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happychatter Donating Member (619 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
24. this is some crazy assed bullshit up in THIS house
it's beyond description

I mean it

words fail me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chascarrillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #24
30. You're telling me. I can't believe that so many people on here are in favor of endorsing bigotry.
It's really disheartening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happychatter Donating Member (619 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #30
65. nice to see you take an interest in the President
would you like me to give you my address so you can come over here and personally beat the living fuck out of me, even though I haven't done anything of a sort?

I think you would

and that's a problem

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
29. Warren wasn't "picked" for anything; he is saying a prayer.
Do you dislike Obama's cabinet picks? Because they are whom you should use as a comparison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chascarrillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. What, he just showed up and said "Hey! I'm sayin' a prayer!" and everyone went along with it?
Huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. It's a stupid analogy. Warren isn't a policy maker.
Why not make a relevant comparison, such as Obama's actual cabinet picks?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 02:05 AM
Response to Reply #29
71. Not picked? Was it just his turn?
Fucking stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
37. looks like 27 DUers need to 'go Green'
good riddance
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thewiseguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. So do you still think Obama is an evangelical?
:rofl:

Is not that what you were teaching us last night?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. I never made such a post
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonnyblitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #38
43. he thinks that jackass Warren is mainstream!
:crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #43
45. best selling religious author in the country isn't mainstream?
Purpose Driven Life?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seen the light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #45
49. I guess Tim LaHaye is mainstream too? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #45
55. Mein Kampft was also a best seller
It didn't make Hitler mainstream.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #37
42. That's what the nazis said about gays: "good riddance!"
You are in good company there, bud!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #42
46. who is there left for you to vote for?
Nader? Who was the Communist Party candidate last time?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #46
67. Communist Party wouldn't have a Rick Warren problem
And for the record, the Communist Party USA endorsed Obama in 2008, Kerry in 2004, and Gore in 2000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #37
47. If the entire GLBT community went Green
The Democratic PArty would never win another election.

If you include heterosexuals who believe the GLBT rights issue is the civil rights issue of the 21st century (like me), the Democratic Party would die.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #47
48. luckily
the entire GLBT community isn't as fickle as you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #48
51. Did I say I'd go Green?
Nope.

All I said is I no longer trust Obama's judgement in picking Supreme Court justices.

He has proven he has a judgement problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #51
52. yeah, because picking a an inauguration speaker is tantamount
to filling a SCOTUS vacancy.

lmao
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #52
54. Historically, the person chosen for the invocation is somebody
who's views are supported by the incoming president.

That is demonstrative of a lack of judgement on Obama's part.

That he would pick such a vociferous advocate of Prop H8 after that abominaiton passed is also telling of Obama's poor judgement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #54
59. Pass the pipe.
Obama's gonna win reelection whether you like it or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #59
63. You haven't watched politics for very long, have you?
You have no clue what will happen in four years.

He could win in a landslide that rivals Reagan's 1984 win or he could lose in a humiliation that rival's Carter's 1980 loss.

It'll all depend upon the conditions that exist in 2012, and nobody has any clue what those conditions will be.

A good portion of what those conditions will be depends HEAVILY on the next two years. If things get worse and he loses ground in the Congress in 2010, he stands a good chance of losing.

Onb the other hand, if the economic situation improves and he gains ground in the Congress, he'll be tough to beat.

Either way, he needs ever portion of the coalition he put together for 2008. Alienating a large portion of that coalition right out of the gates is never a good idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
50. hahahah! They all come out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chascarrillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #50
56. Yeah, I'm getting the feeling that you want to shove everyone back in the closet.
I guess you feel we belong there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #56
58. Who is "us"? And why do you think that?
Edited on Thu Dec-18-08 10:30 PM by BlooInBloo
EDIT: Oooooh - waitaminute! I think my phrase "all come out" has been radically misunderstood - I get it now! lol!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #56
60. Shut up and go back to your closet
don't you know the only time Democrats want to see you is for the time it takes for you to show up for the polls?

And to be honest, I wish that was just sarcasm. Sadly, the Democratic PArty obviously only wants to have anything to do with the GLBT community on election day. The rest of the time, they wish the GLBT community would simply disappear.

IT reminds me of how the Democrats treated the black community during the seventies and much of the eighties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 02:04 AM
Response to Reply #50
70. You've been very quiet about the Warren thing
why?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Two Americas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
53. hadn't thought about that
Edited on Thu Dec-18-08 10:28 PM by Two Americas
SCOTUS was the killer, close the deal argument before the election - the big irrefutable undeniable reason why we had to be enthusiastic about the election and see it as vitally important.

Now, we have won and won with a big mandate, as the general public finally thoroughly rejected Reaganomics and the religious right. Yet one would think that the election was a referendum on the political Left, not the political right. One would think it had been the Left that was repudiated and banished to the wilderness.

I was completely confident about this until recently, but now, after hearing the justifications for reaching out to the extreme right, after seeing the Left trashed and dismissed again and again, and when I think about the anemic response to the Roberts and Alito nominations by the Democrats...

I have to vote "no." I do not have confidence about Supreme Court appointments anymore.

How come when they win, they win, and when we win, we don't?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #53
57. Your response should be an original post n/.t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #53
64. Surprise, surprise...
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShadowLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
66. What we should worry about is conservative versions of David Souter, not Obama
Edited on Thu Dec-18-08 10:58 PM by ShadowLiberal
I trust Obama 100% with Supreme Court picks.

What I worry about however is Obama picking someone who everything THINKS is a liberal, but who then turns traitor similar to how everyone thought David Souter was a conservative, only to have him turn into a liberal on the court.

It was great for us that it happened and we got a liberal on the court, but what if we make that same mistake and put a conservative on the court? We'd be giving the conservative voting bloc their 5th vote if that happened, which is why we ought to be VERY careful with who we put on the court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 02:00 AM
Response to Original message
68. Well, unfortunate things happen when Obama gets all reachy outy,
so we probably should exercise some caution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 02:08 AM
Response to Original message
72. No. At this point I believe he'll nominate someone center right at best.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tiggeroshii Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 02:09 AM
Response to Original message
73. I'm sorry, did he pick Rick Warren for a position that makes decisions?
What am I missing? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Two Americas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 02:25 AM
Response to Reply #73
75. hmm...
Just how finely can these hairs be split?

Why don't we just withhold all commentary until historians have had an opportunity to thoroughly analyze and assess the administration - in, oh say, 50 years or so?

I mean really! Who are we to speak out? Who do we think we are? Free citizens in a representative democracy or something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tiggeroshii Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 02:58 AM
Response to Reply #75
76. Exactly.
Who are we to want to focus our attention to people who actually make decisions? To want to speak out about things that actually do matter?

Because look how ridiculous it is for the president to actually allow a person who he disagrees with to speak on a stage with him!

And how dare us for wanting to speak out about things like the new FEC chairman and the like, about people who are actually effecting the direction of this new administration?

I do think it's ridiculous we try to talk to anybody who disagrees with us. Don't you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnieGordon Donating Member (415 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 03:08 AM
Response to Original message
77. Other: He might decide to go "post-partisan" and nominate a moderate Repug
It'd really be going over the line, so I don't think it's likely. But he's very committed to his post-partisan, centrist crap. One moderate Repug nomination is a definite possibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duer 157099 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 03:12 AM
Response to Original message
78. A month ago I would have laughed at this question
Now I shudder at it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 08:05 AM
Response to Original message
79. Actually, I don't right now....That's not to say I won't change my
mind, but Obama sounds like he's in the mindset right now of selecting at least one right wing fundamentalist .. just because he wants to give a proverbial hand job to the fundies.

Let's hope he gets his shit together.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
80. The mention of Cass Sunstein has always bothered me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC