Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anyone else think Hillary still has her eye on the presidency?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
begin_within Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 11:00 AM
Original message
Anyone else think Hillary still has her eye on the presidency?
Though she may not say anything about it until 2016...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. Right now I honestly don't care either way....
The sun rises in the east and politicians have ambitions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
2. Of course she doesn't -- she's a team player
Obama is no Jimmy Carter and Hillary is no Ted Kennedy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zombie2 Donating Member (678 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
3. I bet she's thinking....
....why wait? :shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Metric System Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. ENOUGH!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. wahhhHHH
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
5. Yes, let's change the subject
NOT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
6. 2016 is possible. If anyone is implying 2012, they need to up their dosage. nt
Edited on Mon Dec-01-08 11:07 AM by onehandle
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
7. I think she has her eye on being a great SoS
Practical and ambitious person that she is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bridgit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
9. I don't think so...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PeaceNikki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
10. ???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
11. It doesn't matter. Susan Rice will be the utterly perfect candidate in 2016.
It's a new generation in America, many have said that Hillary was too much a creature of the 90's to be relevant in 2008.
To the extent that that is true, she'll not be more well suited to the role in 2016.

As to your question, does she have her eye on it?

In some way, she must always have that thought on her mind, 2016 or sooner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
12. No, not at all.
I think she gave it her best and she has accepted the loss.

JMHO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blue_onyx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #12
24. I agree
She said a few months ago that it's unlikely she'll run again. I believe her. I takes a lot to run for president and to come that close and lose...it's hard to go back once you've accepted the loss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #24
28. Your read and my read on the issue are pretty much identical. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
13. NO JUST YOU
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vanderBeth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
14. She doesn't have a chance anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
15. Also, your ignorance of Civics is showing through -- just give it a REST
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
16. I'll let you know in 2016. Right now, let's think 2008 and 2009, and remain in reality.
I'm still laughing over all the paranoid, myopic nimrods who kept saying "They will cancel the elections in 200x, ooga booga dooma and glooma!", where x = 2, 4, 6, or 8.

And those who presumptively thought we would win in 2002 and 2004, with so much hubris putting up pics of champagne and other forms booze in their sig lines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
17. Isn't SOS somewhere in the line of ascension to POTUS?
Not to say IN ANY WAY that I think that anything nefarious may be afoot nor can I emphasize enough how horrific it would be if we got to the point that we would have to replace Obama AND Biden but maybe, if SOS is somewhere in the line of ascension, that is one of the reasons that Obama wanted her as SOS? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MyNameGoesHere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #17
72. I don't know ask Al Haig. He didn't know either. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lyric Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #17
85. It's the Line of Succession, and yes.
Edited on Mon Dec-01-08 03:32 PM by oktoberain
Secretary of State is fourth in line. It goes like this:

Vice President
Speaker of the House
President pro tempore of the Senate
Sec. of State
Sec. of the Treasury
Sec. of Defense
Attorney General
Sec. of the Interior
Sec. of Agriculture
Sec. of Commerce
Sec. of Labor
Sec. of Health and Human Services
Sec. of Housing and Urban Development
Sec. of Transportation
Sec. of Energy
Sec. of Education
Sec. of Veteran's Affairs
Sec. of Homeland Security

And I disagree with you; Obama chose her because she's the best person for the job. Nothing else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SwampG8r Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #17
88. 4th or 5th i think
behind VP and speaker of the house
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeeHopeWin Donating Member (649 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
18. Please
Shut the fuck up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
19. Bet on Hillary 2016. SoS is a huge resume filler and will erase memories of Snipergate.
Of course she does. To think otherwise is Hillaryous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
20. Is the pope catholic?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
21. If she does a great job as SOS, she should go for it
Time heals and changes people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
22. She has said she doesn't think she's going to run again
From last month : http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/10/14/second-white-house-run-un_n_134513.html



Not saying this particularly means anything, but she has said something on the subject.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alter Ego Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
23. No, cause she'll be 70-something by 2016.
And that's too fucking old to be President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
musicblind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #23
64. No, She'll be 67/68. Same age as Al Gore. They both could run in 2016.
There could also be newer up and coming candidates. But Hillary will not be too old to try again in 2016.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SheilaT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
25. And like in the next eight years
not a single younger Democrat will show up who will be a good next president.

Let's see a show of hands: who here in 2004 thought Barack Obama, then an Illinois State Senator, would be our next President?

All anyone talked about on this forum for the next two and a half years, and for much of the next year after that, was the same old same old list: Al Gore, John Kerry, Hillary Clinton, Dennis Kucinich, and a few others. Now, with all due respect to those honorable men and woman, every single one of them was a look at the past.

Whoever the Democrat is who wins the nomination in 2016 will be, I can guarantee it, someone none of us is thinking of now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoesTo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
26. In 2016, it will be 24 years since she became first lady.
24 years ago, who was first lady? Hmm. That was 1984. It was Nancy Reagan. Well, that's unfair, since Hillary was reaffirmed as first lady in 1996, 20 years before 2016. Who became first lady 20 years ago? Let's see, 1988, that was Barbara Bush.

Seems like this was her perfect year. By 2016, the Clinton years will be ancient history.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AJH032 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. Hillary was younger though
than Bush or Reagan, when she became first lady.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #26
29. Except that a major portion of Obama's administration are from the Clinton years.
And Hillary will be in the news most every day for up to the next four years or so.

And Bill will still be out there.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
faithfulcitizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
30. absolutely
and why not? I don't know if I'd vote for her in the primary, but I don't see why she shouldn't run...in 2016.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrah_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
31. Welcome to the land of ignore-
Pathetic really.

Now begone!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mvd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
32. I don't think so - she'll be 8 years older
Edited on Mon Dec-01-08 11:57 AM by mvd
I supported her over Obama because I thought she had the experience needed to beat the Rove team - and that she's about the same on the political spectrum now as Obama, if not in the past. But I was proven wrong that someone like her is needed, and I think someone fresh will emerge in 2016.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. I agree that her presidential aspirations are over
Besides her age, there are too many other factors that will play into it between now and 2016. Other fresh faces are going to emerge and 2016 won't be another 2008. Hillary and Barack both knew that there would never be as good a chance to make history like there was in 2008, considering the odds that anyone emerging from the Democratic Primary as the winner was going to hand the Republicans a loss because of Bush's previous 8 dreadful years. That's why both of them were in the primary race to the bitter end. It was the opportunity of a lifetime and I think she realizes that. You're right, though, her age is the number one factor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
34. Well duh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
35. No. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
36. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Metric System Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. Still role-playing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. He's got the role down pat.
Why so upset?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Metric System Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #38
42. Ugh, you again? I'm hardly surprised to see the two of you continuing to engage in divisive behavior
And, no, he does not "have the role down pat." I think most Hillary supporters here know that this is Obama's administration and she's working for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #42
44. You're the one who's all upset.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mkultra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #42
46. We need to stand together against the Hillhate
Lock arms and we will red rover them into non existence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Metric System Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #46
51. GIVE IT A REST
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mkultra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #51
55. I AGREE!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #55
63. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
mkultra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #63
66. just the bridge to tomorrow buddy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mkultra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. role D20 save vs slime
I rolled a 16. Is that enough?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starbucks Anarchist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #36
43. Head of State = POTUS.
You're thinking "Head of the State Department."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #43
47. The poster knows that -- they have an agenda
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starbucks Anarchist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #47
48. Ah.
Damn, I always miss these things. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #48
50. That's because you're off melon balling
The psoter has been a rabidly anti-Hillary Supporter poster since Day One (notice how I phrased that). They ahve attacked me for months and called me filthy names -- as well as many other people. Over the weekend, they changed their avatar and have started posting loony-tunes stuff acting like they are a PUMA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starbucks Anarchist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #50
53. Melon balling killed my brain cells.
Though now that I think about it, I remember that poster being anti-Hillary, but I guess the avatar threw me off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #53
56. It also makes you go blind
Even my sweet Starbucks Anarchist only looks at the avatar!

:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #53
57. It also makes you go blind
Even my sweet Starbucks Anarchist only looks at the avatar!

:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starbucks Anarchist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #57
58. I keep LensCrafters in bidness.
Word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #58
59. You are such a Pev
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mkultra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #50
54. No suprise, this is like the new freeperville when it comes to Hillary
They have to attack and attack . Where is this so called "UNITY"? huh?

Im with you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #50
67. Clearly they've gotten over the primaries.
Perhaps you should too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #43
49. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #36
60. The satire was funny for a bit. Time to let it go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mkultra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #60
61. critics!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #61
68. It's always the usual suspects.
Ignore their hatred.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
40. Eh, don't care. Hopefully someone newish will appear on the scene by then, anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
41. I'll worry about it in 2014. Until then, give it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azmouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
45. Meh... who cares any more?
I just want her to do a good job as SoS and I think she will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
52. Every politician with a pulse has an eye on the Presidency. It's the business of politics --
nothing wrong with it, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
62. Maybe.
I think she must know that she's taking a position that isn't going to win her the domestic glory she would need for a presidential run. SecState is not the post to build her "working Americans" base, as she could have in the Senate.

I believe that she has given up, realizing that her age will be seen as a problem in 2016, and that Obama is not likely to be a one-termer. Clinton is ambitious, but I think that her acceptance signals a willingness to sublimate her star power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
65. I would think so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hell Hath No Fury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
69. Does the Pope wear Prada?
Obama will have to spend the next 4/8 years watching his back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
70. I sure hope she does!!!!
Obviously not now, but in the future. I still want Hillary to be called "Madam President" some day and become our first female president.

:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mkultra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #70
75. that would be truly historic
We missed a chance at a historic election this time but we where so close.

18 Million baby!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #75
77. We missed it by a hair,
and I'm itching to see it fulfilled. Time will only tell.

;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happychatter Donating Member (619 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
71. I dunno. What do YOU think about when you masturbate?
no, don't answer

I just don't care
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mkultra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #71
74. Hillary!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happychatter Donating Member (619 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #74
76. mk u been steadily cracking me up for days
thank you

I have tears in my eyes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #74
78. TMI people, TMI!!!!!
Sick puppies........

:eyes:


:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #74
81. Duff? Swank? Sir Edmund?
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PresidentObama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
73. If she does, she has my support 100%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DireStrike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
79. Oh without a doubt.
The SoS position gives her more to run on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
80. I am hoping she's thinking about running for Governor of NY
Having been SoS , a presidential candidate, a senator, and First Lady gives her some credentials for Governor..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
82. I agree. If Joe Biden decides to run,
I think she will run against him and probably win the nomination this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #82
83. Biden won't run in 2016, he'll be 73 by then.
Even older than McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chorophyll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
84. Why shouldn't she?
Especially in 2016? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #84
86. Maybe because her top priority right now should be SoS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chorophyll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #86
89. Fine. Of course, you might want to take that up with the OP.
I didn't start this thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peace frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
87. Sure, why shouldn't she run in 2016
but it's impossible to know what her chances might be. The US could be a very different place and she may not fit the profile of the leader that will be needed at that time.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
90. So what if she does?
IMO, if she does it will be a huge motivator to do a superb job as SoS, and be a loyal soldier for Obama. Win-win!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Splinter Cell Donating Member (498 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
91. Is she breathing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RFKHumphreyObama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
92. I think she's undecided
I think she'll make up her mind closer to the date. That doesn't mean she won't be a team player
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC