Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If Pres Elect Obama does not repeal Shrub's tax cuts for the rich as advertised - what's the payoff?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
RiverStone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 08:35 PM
Original message
If Pres Elect Obama does not repeal Shrub's tax cuts for the rich as advertised - what's the payoff?
Looks like President Elect Obama may not repeal Shrub's tax cuts for the very rich after all; rather he would just let them expire in 2011 (per Keith on Countdown tonight).

Parody within our tax structure was a staple of his campaign, I am surprised and disappointed to hear he may make this compromise. Why? Why would he do this? What support from the rethugs is he leveraging in return?

On balance, I remained thrilled Barack Obama will be our next president. He will do far, far more right than wrong; but this delay of tax parody is not what I expected, particularly given the fact Obama campaigned so vigorously to make it happen ASAP.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Seen the light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. Question about this
Now my memory is legendarily awful, but wasn't Obama's healthcare plan going to paid for by repealing the tax cuts ASAP? What's going to happen with that now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. You have to remember that Obama is facing an entirely different
situation now than when he made those promises literally years ago...

Now to let them expire will allow for tax planning as well as to get people behind whatever stimulus package he is going to have to put in place...

And if you think about the situation from a political situation, it is foolish for Obama to let the tax cuts expire right before he is up for re-election. This alone tells me that Obama is more concerned about cobbling together the coalition needed to pass his stimulus package and get the country on the right track than some political gamesmanship three years down the road.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Exactly!
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RiverStone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Too early to really know if this chess move is a wise one...
Edited on Mon Nov-24-08 08:54 PM by RiverStone
Ultimately, after such a brilliant campaign I can defer some disappointment to the assumption he knows what the hell he is doing. I certainly can give him that benefit of doubt.

Many of us assumed he would be a little to the the right of what many on DU would ideally want --- well worth it to turn the White House BLUE!! Yet I hope he does not go too far as to alienate such a passionate and dedicated constituency --- here on the liberal blogs (as the corporate MSM likes to say). Some principles are also not worth compromising --- at any cost!

When the dust settles, I remain faithful that President Elect Obama will honor his pledge on the tax structure. Even a couple of years delayed, I'll hold him to that. And also expect he will easily win in 2012 for his second term. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
4. Expires in 2010.
but yeah....at the end of that year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DiverDave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
5. It's the old " we need the republicans"
to get our stimulus passed...bs, just give the rich fucks more money, then shove it up my ass...

The game is the same, there aint no 'change' coming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RiverStone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. agree and disagree
Giving the rich fucks more $$$ (or continuing a unfair system) - absolutely! Buzzkill for sure.

But the players are changing DiverDave and ultimately, Obama will change the game as well! I'm confident in that. It just may not be as fast or as "left" as we ideally want. No way the game will ever, EVER be the same as that which was played upon the American people by the criminal regime of Shrub and Shooter.

I may diss a decision here and there, but Obama is the man to bring change! Won't ever diss the BIG picture --- on the contrary, I'm very grateful.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DiverDave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
6. oops
Edited on Mon Nov-24-08 08:48 PM by DiverDave
double, srry
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gravity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
7. It will give Obama a ton of political leverage
and it isn't a good idea to raise taxes in a major recession. After the economy stabilizes, then he can start raising taxes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Taking away tax cuts is not raising taxes...
It's closing loopholes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
10. I want the complete and perfect explanation NOOOOWWW daddy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RiverStone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. An explanation is reasonable...
Tho not seeking it to be perfect.

Just because I'm thrilled Obama won, does not mean I won't question authority - even an authority I worked like heck to elect! :think:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. And I want it NOOOOWWW daddy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Applepie Donating Member (143 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
13. My memory may not be the best
but as I understood it, he had planned to let them expire. He is brilliant and I trust him. I listening to his audio book DREAMS FROM MY FATHER. It is great to hear his voice reading it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KakistocracyHater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
15. war bonds
I watched a film on TCM earlier today & at the end was a "buy war bonds" ad, what about a modern 1 to help pay for Bush's self-mad messes, we'll call then BUSH BONDS. Anyone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
verges Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
16. Sorry to quibble, but....
Parody--A humorous or satirical imitation.

Parity--Equality, equivalence.

courtesy of Webster's.

We tend to laugh at freepers when they make wrong word choices. We need to be better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
17. 2010 vs. 2011. Meh. Small potatoes. I'm willing to accept it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
18. well
three things:
Obama said he would change tax brackets, he never said he would repeal any law

and congress is the only authority that can change the law, Obama can sign it or veto it.


third: what the hell is wrong with you people claiming this or that when Obama has not been quoted as saying anything other than what he said: "will raise taxes on those making over $250,000 a year."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC