Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

(((Breaking-))) Aides Say Obama May Delay Rolling Back Tax Cuts On The Wealthy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 11:02 AM
Original message
(((Breaking-))) Aides Say Obama May Delay Rolling Back Tax Cuts On The Wealthy
Per MSNBC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. Oh, they'd be a great source. Probably trying to pressure on him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. It's not like revenue is a problem or anything.
It's not as if acting quickly is critical.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. It's funny because I heard someone on CNN doing exactly that last week.
The surrogate did very well, though, and continued to restate his own frame and position. It may have been Rahm but I'm not sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
2. "Aides say"
Anything to keep people watching / speculating pointlessly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
3. "delay"!?!?? Did he give the roll back a deadline? I never saw a deadline on his issue list? If not
...this is more hater-aide from the right
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
5. He may just let them go off the book and not renew them in 2010
When he delivers his new budget and the time they actually are scheduled to go off the books is a matter of months, so it might be a matter of just letter the damn thing die, and putting more energy into a works program.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. there ya go. He'll likely just not renew them. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. The was the plan anyway. Just let them expire
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. Yep, that is what I remember..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
6. The tax cuts expire at some date don't they? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. Yes. 2010.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Windy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. No one has ever reported that he is not going to let the tax cuts expire in 2010... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #15
21. Yea, I've heard the opposite: That he IS going to let them expire...I think he even said that..
...once.

So he's not "delaying" a damn thing regardless the spew from MSRNC. They expire in 2010 and I believe he intends to let them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
11. Breaking? Obama said throughout the campaign that they should be allowed to expire...
...in 2010.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gblady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #11
20. yep....
he said it over and over...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
13. That makes sense until the major fires are put out. Getting people back to work
Health care, and getting us out of Iraq are the top priority

After things are stable, especially economically, then he can address the deficit

To do so right now in the middle of a recession, would be suicide





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. That's Textbook Keynesian Economics
~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #17
25. It is Keynsian which apparently our DLC influenced President elect is not going to
follow. I hope he's a quick study and learns from his mistakes early on in his Presidency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. Lord Keynes Would Increase Federal Spending And Cut Taxes For Everybody
~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. Actually, John Maynard Keynes called for a reduction in interest rates not taxes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #30
35. The Fed Fund Rate Is Only One Percent
It can't get much lower.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. Has nothing to do with what he said. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #36
40. How Else Is Governemt Going To Reduce Interest Rates Then By Reducing The Fed Fund Rates
And they are loaning banks tons of money; about $350 billion worth in the past couple of months and another $350 billion to come...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #40
44. I said what Keynes said back before I was born a long time ago.
It has nothing to do with the interest ratea today. I was correcting you on what you said about cutting taxes. That isn't what he said. He said to cut interest rates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #44
47. Keynes Wanted To Get Money In People's Hands To Create Demand To Ease Recessions
Through fiscal policy (taxing and spending) and/or monetary policy (increasing the money supply)


He wasn't overly worried about defecit spending because he said "In the long run, we're all dead."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #47
48. So? You know that FDR only implemented the parts of his philosophy that
he thought were workable?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #48
51. Yes...Roosevelt Did A Lot Of Experimenting...
He tried a lot of different approaches...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Windy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
14. He is NOT going to delay tax cuts for the middle class... Goolsby/Axelrod
Lets see how he governs before we condemn him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. Who Said Anything About The Middle Class?
~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theoldman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
18. The only way to pay off the national dept is to raise taxes.
It may not happen during the first year but it will happen. It would not surprise me if taxes were raised on everyone six years from now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gblady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #18
22. me thinks....
ending the billions per month in Iraq will help mightily.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #18
37. Trying To Balance The Budget In 1937 Is What Caused A Delay In Ending The Great Depression
~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Writer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
19. Has January 20th gone by this quickly?
I didn't know he was President already!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kevinds13 Donating Member (176 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
23. He's said multiple times that
we should just return to tax levels under Bill Clinton. Rather than writing difficult legislation and risking getting it passed, the easiest way to accomplish that is to just let them expire in 2010. This is the media trying to blow up a non-issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
24. There's a news article on it in the LBN Forum.
It looks like he's following the Chicago School of Economics failed theory of tax cuts as a stimulus. It's failed all over the world where it's been tried, so why is he going to do it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GarbagemanLB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. Maybe because he and his advisors know much more about the situation than we do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. Economics isn't rocket science. It's not that hard to learn and it's
not that hard to dig up the history of the effectiveness of different schools of economics and how they worked out. It turns out that the school of economics that he appears to be favoring has been a failure every where in the world that it has been tried. You seem to think that because he's our President elect he knows better. No he doesn't. It's up to us to know what he needs to do and call him on it when he isn't doing it right. I'm just hoping the news got it wrong and it isn't so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GarbagemanLB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #29
34. Actually, with the team he has around him, he DOES know better. This economic situation IS
complex, and it will be tough to get the economy back on track.

If ever there was a time for 'elites' to be running this country, this is it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #34
38. They want you to believe it's complex.
If I remember correctly during the campaign all you heard was it's too complicated. No it isn't. Usually the best solution is the simplest one. They want you to believe in the complexity because that's how they confuse you and you stop asking questions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GarbagemanLB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. Got an extra tinfoil hat for me?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #39
43. What you need is a thinking cap not a tinfoil hat. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beachmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #24
33. It is not a matter of stimulus. It is a matter that raising taxes in the middle
of a recession can be disastrous. Just ask Hoover.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #33
45. I don't see where he will be raising taxes where it matters. He has
already stated he would tax only those making more than $250,000 a year in income. I think that lets the majority of the working class off the hook. The minority whom he will be taxing going back to the former rates won't be able to make much of a stink that matters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
28. Imagine, already at the end of his second term - how time flies.
Jeez, the man has two months before he's even sworn in..............
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
31. No point this year. Most of the wealthy lost money
Edited on Sun Nov-23-08 12:22 PM by LittleBlue
and will be taxed even though half their wealth dried up. We don't want to overdo it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #31
46. That's a paper loss. They know that if they hang on to their investments,
the stock market will eventually go back up and they will regain their losses. Also, there are a lot of bargains out there right now to be picked up by those with extra cash. The rich aren't hurting. Those who are hurting are people like me retirees with small nest eggs that have gone down in value. Most of us won't recoup the losses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beachmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
32. Yup. You don't raise taxes (or cut spending for that matter) in a spiraling downturn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
41. Okay, I understand short term deficits. But exactly how large do we
want those short term deficits to be?

These are the people who made out under Clinton and Bush. Surely, they should be willing to make a small "sacrifice" for the good of the country.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
42. I'm sure that's true. It was a sales point to show a source for the tax cut proposed.
He'll still deliver the middle class tax cut, but he'll eliminate the tax increase he talked about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #42
49. He has to do a tax increase somewhere or he'll be rattling around like
Arnold Schwarzenegger in an empty Treasure House, trying to get funds by cutting out services and government jobs to achieve it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Not the Only One Donating Member (617 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #49
52. Schwarzenegger can't print currency. Obama can.
That's the difference. The fed doesn't care about deficits ultimately, especially as long as foreign nations would rather invest in the US via U.S. government securities than in other world economies. As bad as things are here, they aren't any better/safer anywhere else. It's all relative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #52
54. If Obama prints currency to reduce the debt, all your savings will become
of less worth as it causes inflation. This is a burden on the middle classes who are trying to save money for college funds and retirement. He needs to recoup some of that 95% of our wealth from the 5% who own it. I mean there will still be plenty for the greedy suckers if they only own 50% of the wealth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #54
55. It's called deficit spending, and it's just what the economist ordered.
Of course Obama is going to use deficit spending to spur the economy.

He's not going to increase taxes 3% in 2009 on the top 5% of taxpayers. He'll wait until the Bush tax cuts come up for renewal, and he'll allow them to lapse, but that won't be in 2009.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #55
56. He really picked the wrong economists. I think someone ought to send that
guy some history, notably the Weimar Republic in Germany and any banana Republic in the fifties in South America. We are better off borrowing more money and being in debt than doing that. At least in 2009 we can start paying back. When the Weimar Republic (a very Democratic government incidentally) printed money to pay off the indebtedness of WWI it reduced the average German's life savings to the price of a meal. It increased unemployment in a country already devasted by war. It helped the rise of the Nazis because the German people were so pissed at being put in the poor house. We have already had eight years of Nazis. We don't need anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dailykoff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
50. Gee, what a shock. I'm sure all those "rivals" he's recruiting
for his economic team were real divided on this one, not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cottonseed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
53. Delaying until 2010, which is letting the Bush tax cuts expire
which is what he'd said all along. You should put a slash through the (((Breaking-))). Makes you look stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC