Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Many Dealings of Bill Clinton Under Review (updated)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 10:51 PM
Original message
Many Dealings of Bill Clinton Under Review (updated)
Edited on Mon Nov-17-08 11:13 PM by ProSense

Many Dealings of Bill Clinton Under Review

By DON VAN NATTA JR. and JO BECKER
Published: November 17, 2008

Over the weekend, former President Bill Clinton enthusiastically endorsed the prospect that his wife, Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton, might join the Obama administration as secretary of state. “If he decided to ask her and they did it together,” the former president said, “I think she’ll be really great as a secretary of state.”

Mr. Clinton delivered those remarks at an international economic symposium in Kuwait City sponsored by the National Bank of Kuwait, which said the former president would “share with a select audience his perspective on the issues likely to shape the future prospects of the region.”

It is precisely that kind of paid speech, which Mr. Clinton delivered 54 times last year for a total of $10.1 million in fees, that has complicated the vetting process that Mrs. Clinton is undergoing by the Obama transition team. “Whatever happens or doesn’t happen is between Obama and her,” Mr. Clinton said.

That may be, but Mr. Clinton’s postpresidential life as a globe-trotting philanthropist, business consultant and speech-giver poses the highest hurdle for Mrs. Clinton to overcome if President-elect Barack Obama chooses to nominate her as secretary of state, according to aides of the Clintons and Mr. Obama.

The Obama transition team is focused on the wide array of Mr. Clinton’s postpresidential activities, some details of which have not been made public. This list includes the identity of most of the donors to his foundation, the source of some of his speaking fees — he has earned as much as $425,000 for a one-hour speech — and his work for the billionaire investor Ronald W. Burkle.

The vetting of Mr. Clinton’s myriad philanthropic and business dealings is “complicated, and it may be the complications that are causing hesitation on both sides,” said Abner J. Mikva, one of Mr. Obama’s closest supporters and a White House counsel during the Clinton administration. “There would have to be full disclosure as to who all were contributors to his library and foundation. I think they’d have to be made public.”

While aides to the president-elect declined Monday to discuss what sort of requirements would make it possible for Mrs. Clinton to serve as secretary of state, they said Mr. Obama would not formally offer her the job unless he was satisfied that there would be no conflicts posed by Mr. Clinton’s activities abroad.

more


Updated to add:

Mikva's high bar

The transition communications director, Dan Pfeiffer, says Obama adviser Abner Mikva didn't speak for the campaign in a Times story that went online this evening, in which Mikva appeared to set an almost impossibly high bar for approving Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State.

“There would have to be full disclosure as to who all were contributors to his library and foundation. I think they’d have to be made public," said Mikva.

That contradicts suggests from other's familiar with the process that the chief focus of negotiations is Clinton's activities with his foundation going forward -- not vetting of his past.

“It’s not just what he does or says — it’s the fact that the foundation is involved with foreign countries, some of which might well be in conflict with U.S. policy,” Mikva told the Times. “It’s more than a legal problem — there are ethical problems and appearance problems.”

A Democrat who saw the quotes suggested Mikva's words were Obama's way of walking back the suggestion that Senator Clinton could serve as secretary of state.

But Pfeiffer, asked if Mikva spoke for the campaign, responded, "no."



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Whoa20 Donating Member (144 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. if this thread were in the '90s, it would probably read
something like "Ken Starr finds no wrong doing in Madison Guarantee, but Suggests for another inquiry"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erin Elizabeth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 12:20 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. Just man up and ASK HER OUT ALREADY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. Updated OP n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. Don't worry. They'll say he is squeaky clean.
It was probably part of the deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Is it possible for you to refrain from personal attacks and calling out other posters?
Edited on Mon Nov-17-08 11:49 PM by ProSense
If you have no comment relevant to the article, why can't you just stay the fuck out of the thread?




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. Hillary Clinton at State Department?

Hillary Clinton at State Department?

By Kim Ghattas in Washington
BBC News, Washington

Hillary Clinton turned from rival to supporter of Mr Obama
There is increasing speculation about Hillary Clinton's possible appointment as secretary of state.

Reports are coming out that a serious vetting process is underway to determine the possible pitfalls of such an appointment.

Mr Obama's team is unlikely to be looking for an excuse to shoot down the idea, but rather genuinely making sure all the bases are covered before any firm jobs offer or announcements are made.

While the story continues to be carried forward based on unnamed Democratic officials quoted in the US media, it is probable that Mr Obama would have found a way to quash it if there was not some truth to it.

"No one has called to say 'Don't go too far on this'," said James Carville, a long-time Clinton friend, quoted in the Washington Post.

<...>

She also said that as president she would "obliterate" Iran, if they ever considered launching an attack against Israel.

Iran lodged a formal protest at the UN. Mr Obama had said he would meet with Iranian leaders after intense preparatory work- it is unclear whether Ms Clinton would be best placed to do that work after her comments.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 11:58 PM
Response to Original message
7. Expect Richardson to be named in the next couple days in my opinion
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 12:18 AM
Response to Original message
8. Bill Clinton is a political genius.
Things are really looking up for the Clintons and it can't possibly be all luck or just due to the actions of Team Obama.

1. The way they are rolling this out is amazing. Obama approached Hillary who is MOST QUALIFIED b/c he wasn't satisfied with Kerry or Richardson (nothing like a little payback). It wasn't part of any quid pro quo. Bill Clinton has assured us that they worked hard to get Obama elected without expecting any reward (unlike Kerry or Richardson, those self-serving politicians).

2. At a time when the economy and financial system is getting ready to implode, they will be involved in the foreign policy arena. Will Bill Clinton remind the American Public of what a great job he did with the economy (and wink, wink, of course Hillary would do even better). Well in the words of Sarah Palin, you betcha. And of course, we already know how EXCEPTIONALLY QUALIFIED Hillary is, that's why Obama sought her out for SOS (because as some people have already reminded us, he needs her to answer the 3 a.m. call). And when the going gets tough, who will all those Clintonites in the Obama administration be loyal to?

Team Obama is building up Hillary Clinton and with the pending depression I think this will go down as a MAJOR political blunder. They are putting her in the catbird seat for a future Whitehouse run (and with Bill and Hillary not getting any younger, 2012 has got to look a heck of a lot better than 2016, especially with the payback they could render). If they can be so mean and spiteful to Kerry and Richardson, can you imagine how they must feel about the guy who beat them?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 12:57 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Team OBAMA is building up Hillary? Sorry, that is delusional. There's zero evidence of that
Edited on Tue Nov-18-08 12:57 AM by cryingshame
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC