Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Don't let Drudge fool you - IBM Selectric II has superscript

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
SoCalDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-04 11:29 PM
Original message
Don't let Drudge fool you - IBM Selectric II has superscript
Edited on Thu Sep-09-04 11:30 PM by SoCalDemocrat
I learned to type on one of these (both II and III actually). The IBM Selectric II has superscript capability. It was widely available by 1972. Don't let Drudge fool you. He's just trying to confuse the issue until the story loses steam.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_Selectric_typewriter


The Selectric typewriter was first released in 1961 and is generally considered to be a design classic. After the Selectric II was introduced a few years later, the original design was designated the Selectric I. The Correcting Selectric II differed from the Selectric I in many respects:

The Selectric II was squarer at the corners, whereas the Selectric I was rounder.

The Selectric II had a Dual Pitch option to allow it to be switched (with a lever at the top left of the "carriage") between 10 and 12 characters per inch, whereas the Selectric I had one fixed "pitch".

The Selectric II had a lever (at the top left of the "carriage") that allowed characters to be shifted up to a half space to the left (for inserting a word one character longer or shorter in place of a deleted mistake), whereas the Selectric I did not.

The Selectric II had optional auto-correction (with the extra key at the bottom right of the keyboard), whereas the Selectric I did not. (The white correction tape was at the left of the typeball and its orange take-up spool at the right of the typeball.)

The Selectric II had a lever (above the right platen knob) that would allow the platen to be turned freely but return to the same vertical line (for inserting such symbols as subscripts and superscripts), whereas the Selectric I did not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
EnfantTerrible Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-04 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. Who's going to tell them that?
and quickly. the pundits are going to get alot of mileage out of this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frodo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-04 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. But it didn't do variable spaced fonts.
Edited on Thu Sep-09-04 11:37 PM by Frodo
And thus could not have produced the memos.

The Elite had some of that.

The Composer may have had all of it - I'm still reading the users manual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-04 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. Composer?
Do tell...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frodo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #10
21. Yep - the IBM Selectric Composer
Quite a piece of equipment. Could even justify and center. Of course you had to type everything twice.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gloria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 02:25 AM
Response to Reply #21
24. Re: The Composer----was this used mostly in printing businesses??
Edited on Fri Sep-10-04 02:28 AM by Gloria
Back in 1972, I worked at a small custom publishing house. I was put on this machine to "set the type"...it justified automatically.

However, one thing I vividly remember: You could NOT make a correction!
If you made a mistake, you had to start all over again!

I didn't last long on that job....But my question is: could these memos all have been typed without a single mistake??? Judging from my experience it doesn't seem likely.

Are we looking at a machine that could be corrected with Kor-rec-tape or White Out???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dennis4868 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-04 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. this is insane.....
the wackos on the right have us reading frinken typewriter manuals from the 1970s....what have we become?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-04 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
3. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
SoCalDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-04 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. And?
Edited on Thu Sep-09-04 11:50 PM by SoCalDemocrat
If the document below is not monospaced

http://www.cbsnews.com/htdocs/pdf/BushGuardaugust18.pdf

The IBM Executive was a variable spaced typewriter, and was available at that time. Also in the same archive I linked.

http://www.etypewriters.com/history.htm

and

http://www-1.ibm.com/ibm/history/history/year_1941.html

Maybe it was an Exectutive and not a Selectric II?

IBM’s Magnetic Card Executive Type-writer (1972) had proportional spacing in a single type face, sacrificing the interchangeable type elements of theSelectric. Magnetic Card Selectric Typewriter II (1973)added memory, allowing text to be stored and moved inmemory and only stored on media when editing wascompleted. It also had the double pitch available on laterSelectrics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kathy in Cambridge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 12:02 AM
Response to Reply #3
20. Uhhhh
see ya latah, pal. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-04 11:38 PM
Response to Original message
4. Read the same page this morning
I was fascinated by the Selectric ball bearing solution that guarantees only one key is pressed at a time. There's a platter underneath the keys filled with a layer of ball bearings. Each key has a thin metal strip that pierces the bearings when pressed. The metal strip is thick enough that it squeezes the bearings together and wont allow another strip to pass until it's released. Cool huh!

Yes, the forgery claim is BS. They're trying to convince us that the early 70's had the same technology as the 40's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DBoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-04 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
6. Hell, it had a typeball for the APL programming language
back in 1975. In my intro computer programming class. I let the weenies do BASIC. I did APL

If you've even seen the APL character set, you'll understand that this means a Selectric could do ANYTHING
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GaryL Donating Member (413 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-04 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
7. Damn it!
I was alive and using the Selectric II BEFORE '72 and I used the superscript capability. And the auto-correction tape too. Who the hell are these people saying it didn't exist?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cogito ergo doleo Donating Member (382 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-04 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. The Weekly Standard
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cogito ergo doleo Donating Member (382 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-04 11:48 PM
Response to Original message
8. It had proportional spacing, too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-04 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. Thought so
Edited on Thu Sep-09-04 11:51 PM by SoCalDemocrat
Thanks. I thought it had proportional type but I wasn't certain after the criticism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cogito ergo doleo Donating Member (382 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-04 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Thank you for clearing up the superscript
That was the one thing I couldn't find.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Must_B_Free Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-04 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. What is this crap about vertical proportional spacing?
mentioned on talkingpointsmemo.com

Why would you want to do that?

ANyway I don't see that in the pdf and if it is, it is probably from the photocopier or fax.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GaryL Donating Member (413 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #8
22. Your're awesome!
My mother actually brought it home from work and I was facinated by the self-correcting tape.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-04 11:48 PM
Response to Original message
9. Thanks...welcome to DU
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud2BAmurkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-04 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
12. Good find
:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-04 11:58 PM
Response to Original message
17. Tell the Washington Post!
It's in LBN. Straight from Freeperville.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 12:02 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. I agree.
Bundle up your information, tie it with a bow, and blast away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-04 11:59 PM
Response to Original message
18. My Dad worked for IBM for 35 years and I've seen many Selectrics
Edited on Fri Sep-10-04 12:00 AM by zulchzulu
There were different typeface attachments you could attach to the typeball (sorry, no manual...) where you could have all different types of typeface combinations...mathematical, scientific, accountant or whatever. The guvmint prolly had their own typeballs for their own needs.

This wasn't 1932 typewriters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gloria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 12:31 AM
Response to Reply #18
23. I had a Selectric I (used) and had two or three font balls....
worked with the Selectric II and the memory Selectric, too.

I loved my Selectric!! They were great machines....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 02:29 AM
Response to Original message
25. Look at this advertisement.
Edited on Fri Sep-10-04 02:29 AM by girl gone mad
I'm not sure of the date, but it appears to be late 60s:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
troublemaker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 02:33 AM
Response to Reply #25
26. Cool ad. But dammit, no fours in the text
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC