Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Evidence Faux Knows They Are Lying About the "Forgery"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
mourningdove92 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-04 08:07 PM
Original message
Evidence Faux Knows They Are Lying About the "Forgery"
I just went to their website. NOTHING about any possibility of the CBS documents being forged. They are a lot more careful about what they put in writing as opposed to the "opinions" they spew on their show.

BTW, I checked their polls. Smirks job approval is 49% approve, 44%disapprove.

still below 50%

bet they are DISCUSSING that, are they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-04 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. The fact that Rich Lowry (r) whore and Brett Bozell (r) whore
are out doing damage control is a very good sign that these documents are indeed the real thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-04 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. Bush released a document in 2000 that used the same proportional
and superscripted font as these memos were typed in:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Julian English Donating Member (232 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-04 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Also seen here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jfalchion Donating Member (212 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-04 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. reply
Are #2 and #3 proportional font? The serif on the i looks quite wide.

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Julian English Donating Member (232 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-04 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Damb--14 may not be comtemporary to the others
I am looking at the Doc 14 and that may be later, as it stated it was the biography of *
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zaj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-04 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. I'm missing the superscript... where is it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-04 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Line 2
That's where the font is different, too.

Form AF7 is a record over a period of time. Different clerks fill out different parts over a period of years.

Line 2 is the line of interest where 111th is superscripted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-04 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. What is needed are documents from other military personnel
from the same unit and time period to determine if the same machine was used.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zaj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-04 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. BTW, this doc is 1973... When was the Memo?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Aug 20th 2014, 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC